Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2015:88 | Cite as

A multisymplectic approach to defects in integrable classical field theory

Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Abstract

We introduce the concept of multisymplectic formalism, familiar in covariant field theory, for the study of integrable defects in 1 + 1 classical field theory. The main idea is the coexistence of two Poisson brackets, one for each spacetime coordinate. The Poisson bracket corresponding to the time coordinate is the usual one describing the time evolution of the system. Taking the nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation as an example, we introduce the new bracket associated to the space coordinate. We show that, in the absence of any defect, the two brackets yield completely equivalent Hamiltonian descriptions of the model. However, in the presence of a defect described by a frozen Bäcklund transformation, the advantage of using the new bracket becomes evident. It allows us to reinterpret the defect conditions as canonical transformations. As a consequence, we are also able to implement the method of the classical r matrix and to prove Liouville integrability of the system with such a defect. The use of the new Poisson bracket completely bypasses all the known problems associated with the presence of a defect in the discussion of Liouville integrability. A by-product of the approach is the reinterpretation of the defect Lagrangian used in the Lagrangian description of integrable defects as the generating function of the canonical transformation representing the defect conditions.

Keywords

Integrable Field Theories Integrable Hierarchies 

References

  1. [1]
    B. McCoy and J. Perk, Two-spin correlation functions of an Ising model with continuous exponents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 840.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    N.R. Jungwirth et al., A single-molecule approach to ZnO defect studies: single photons and single defects, arXiv:1402.1773.
  3. [3]
    F. Nabarro, Theory of crystaline dislocation, Clarendon Press, Oxford U.K. (1967).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. Chandrasekhar and G. Ranganath, The structure and energetics of defects in liquid crystals, Adv. Phys. 35 (1986) 507.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    T. Lubensky et al., Topological defects and interactions in Nematic emulsions, cond-mat/9707133.
  6. [6]
    D. Vollhardt and C. Wolfe, The phases of Helium 3, Taylor & Francis (1990).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    G. Delfino, G. Mussardo and P. Simonetti, Statistical models with a line of defect, Phys. Lett. B 328 (1994) 123 [hep-th/9403049] [INSPIRE].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    G. Delfino, G. Mussardo and P. Simonetti, Scattering theory and correlation functions in statistical models with a line of defect, Nucl. Phys. B 432 (1994) 518 [hep-th/9409076] [INSPIRE].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    R. Konik and A. LeClair, Purely transmitting defect field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 538 (1999) 587 [hep-th/9703085] [INSPIRE].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    O.A. Castro-Alvaredo, A. Fring and F. Gohmann, On the absence of simultaneous reflection and transmission in integrable impurity systems, hep-th/0201142 [INSPIRE].
  11. [11]
    M. Mintchev, E. Ragoucy and P. Sorba,, Reflection-transmission algebras, J. Phys. A 36 (2003) 10407.ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    V. Caudrelier, M. Mintchev and E. Ragoucy, The quantum non-linear Schrödinger model with point-like defect, J. Phys. A 37 (2004) L367 [hep-th/0404144] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    V. Caudrelier, M. Mintchev and E. Ragoucy, Solving the quantum non-linear Schrodinger equation with delta-type impurity, J. Math. Phys. 46 (2005) 042703 [math-ph/0404047].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Z. Bajnok and A. George, From defects to boundaries, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 21 (2006) 1063 [hep-th/0404199] [INSPIRE].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Z. Bajnok and O. el Deeb, Form factors in the presence of integrable defects, Nucl. Phys. B 832 (2010) 500 [arXiv:0909.3200] [INSPIRE].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    R. Weston, An algebraic setting for defects in the XXZ and sine-Gordon models, arXiv:1006.1555 [INSPIRE].
  17. [17]
    V. Caudrelier, M. Mintchev, E. Ragoucy and P. Sorba, Reflection-transmission quantum Yang-Baxter equations, J. Phys. A 38 (2005) 3431 [hep-th/0412159] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    P. Bowcock, E. Corrigan and C. Zambon, Classically integrable field theories with defects, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19S2 (2004) 82 [hep-th/0305022] [INSPIRE].CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    P. Bowcock, E. Corrigan and C. Zambon, Affine Toda field theories with defects, JHEP 01 (2004) 056 [hep-th/0401020] [INSPIRE].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    E. Corrigan and C. Zambon, Aspects of sine-Gordon solitons, defects and gates, J. Phys. A 37 (2004) L471 [hep-th/0407199] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    E. Corrigan and C. Zambon, Jump-defects in the nonlinear Schrödinger model and other non-relativistic field theories, Nonlinearity 19 (2006) 1447 [nlin/0512038].CrossRefADSMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    E. Corrigan and C. Zambon, On purely transmitting defects in affine Toda field theory, JHEP 07 (2007) 001 [arXiv:0705.1066] [INSPIRE].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    E. Corrigan and C. Zambon, Comments on defects in the a(r) Toda field theories, J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 304008 [arXiv:0902.1307] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    E. Corrigan and C. Zambon, A new class of integrable defects, J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 475203 [arXiv:0908.3126] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    V. Caudrelier, On a systematic approach to defects in classical integrable field theories, IJGMMP 5 (2008) 1085 [arXiv:0704.2326].MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    M.J. Ablowitz, D.J. Kaup, A.C. Newell and H. Segur, The inverse scattering transform fourier analysis for nonlinear problems, Stud. Appl. Math. 53 (1974) 249 [INSPIRE].MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    I. Habibullin and A. Kundu, Quantum and classical integrable sine-Gordon model with defect, Nucl. Phys. B 795 (2008) 549 [arXiv:0709.4611] [INSPIRE].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    J. Avan and A. Doikou, Liouville integrable defects: the non-linear Schrödinger paradigm, JHEP 01 (2012) 040 [arXiv:1110.4728] [INSPIRE].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    J. Avan and A. Doikou, The sine-Gordon model with integrable defects revisited, JHEP 11 (2012) 008 [arXiv:1205.1661] [INSPIRE].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    A. Doikou, A note on GLN type-I integrable defects, J. Stat. Mech. (2014) P02002.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    A. Doikou, Classical impurities associated to high rank algebras, Nucl. Phys. B 884 (2014) 142 [arXiv:1312.4786] [INSPIRE].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    T.J. Bridges, P.E. Hydon and J.K. Lawson, Multisymplectic structures and the variational bicomplex, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 148 (2010) 159.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    T. De Donder, Théorie invariante du calcul des variations, Gauthier-Villars, Paris France (1935).Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    H. Weyl, Geodesic fields in the calculus of variations, Ann. Math. 36 (1935) 607.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    A. Kundu, Unraveling hidden hierarchies and dual structures in an integrable field model, arXiv:1201.0627 [INSPIRE].
  36. [36]
    F. Magri, A simple model of the integrable Hamiltonian equation, J. Math. Phys. 19 (1978) 1156 [INSPIRE].CrossRefADSMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    E.K. Sklyanin, On complete integrability of the Landau-Lifshitz equation, LOMI E-79-3 (1980).
  38. [38]
    E.K. Sklyanin, The quantum version of the inverse scattering method, Zap. Nauchn. Sem. LOMI 95 (1980) 55.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    L.D. Faddeev and L.A. Takhtajan, Hamiltonian methods in the theory of solitons, Springer, Germany (2007).MATHGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Y. Kodama and M. Wadati, Theory of canonical transformations for nonlinear evolution equations. 1, Prog. Theor. Phys. 56 (1976) 1740 [INSPIRE].CrossRefADSMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Y. Kodama, Theory of canonical transformations for nonlinear evolution equations. II, Prog. Theor. Phys. 57 (1977) 1900.CrossRefADSMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    C. Zambon, The classical nonlinear Schrödinger model with a new integrable boundary, JHEP 08 (2014) 036 [arXiv:1405.0967] [INSPIRE].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    M. Gaudin and V. Pasquier, The periodic Toda chain and a matrix generalization of the bessel functions recursion relations, J. Phys. A 25 (1992) 5243.ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    E. Sklyanin, Bäcklund transformations and Baxters Q-operator, nlin/0009009.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsCity University LondonLondonU.K.
  2. 2.Theory DivisionSaha Institute of Nuclear PhysicsKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations