Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2012:129 | Cite as

A two-tiered correlation of dark matter with missing transverse energy: reconstructing the lightest supersymmetric particle mass at the LHC

  • Tianjun Li
  • James A. Maxin
  • Dimitri V. Nanopoulos
  • Joel W. Walker
Article

Abstract

We suggest that non-trivial correlations between the dark matter particle mass and collider based probes of missing transverse energy \( H_{\text{T}}^{\text{miss}} \) may facilitate a two tiered approach to the initial discovery of supersymmetry and the subsequent reconstruction of the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) mass at the LHC. These correlations are demonstrated via extensive Monte Carlo simulation of seventeen benchmark models, each sampled at five distinct LHC center-of-mass beam energies, spanning the parameter space of No-Scale \( \mathcal{F} \) -SU(5). This construction is defined in turn by the union of the \( \mathcal{F} \) -lipped SU(5) Grand Unified Theory, two pairs of hypothetical TeV scale vector-like supersymmetric multiplets with origins in \( \mathcal{F} \) -theory, and the dynamically established boundary conditions of No-Scale Supergravity. In addition, we consider a control sample comprised of a standard minimal Supergravity benchmark point. Led by a striking similarity between the \( H_{\text{T}}^{\text{miss}} \) distribution and the familiar power spectrum of a black body radiator at various temperatures, we implement a broad empirical fit of our simulation against a Poisson distribution ansätz. We advance the resulting fit as a theoretical blueprint for deducing the mass of the LSP, utilizing only the missing transverse energy in a statistical sampling of ≥ 9 jet events. Cumulative uncertainties central to the method subsist at a satisfactory 12-15% level. The fact that supersymmetric particle spectrum of No-Scale \( \mathcal{F} \) -SU(5) has thrived the withering onslaught of early LHC data that is steadily decimating the Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model and minimal Supergravity parameter spaces is a prime motivation for augmenting more conventional LSP search methodologies with the presently proposed alternative.

Keywords

Supersymmetry Phenomenology 

References

  1. [1]
    WMAP collaboration, D. Spergel et al., First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: determination of cosmological parameters, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 148 (2003) 175 [astro-ph/0302209] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    WMAP collaboration, D. Spergel et al., Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) three year results: implications for cosmology, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 170 (2007) 377 [astro-ph/0603449] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    WMAP collaboration, E. Komatsu et al., Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: cosmological interpretation, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192 (2011) 18 [arXiv:1001.4538] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    J.R. Ellis, J. Hagelin, D.V. Nanopoulos, K.A. Olive and M. Srednicki, Supersymmetric relics from the big bang, Nucl. Phys. B 238 (1984) 453 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    H. Goldberg, Constraint on the photino mass from cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 1419 [Erratum ibid. 103 (2009) 099905] [INSPIRE].
  6. [6]
    H.-C. Cheng and I. Low, TeV symmetry and the little hierarchy problem, JHEP 09 (2003) 051 [hep-ph/0308199] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    H.-C. Cheng and I. Low, Little hierarchy, little Higgses and a little symmetry, JHEP 08 (2004) 061 [hep-ph/0405243] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    G. Servant and T.M. Tait, Is the lightest Kaluza-Klein particle a viable dark matter candidate?, Nucl. Phys. B 650 (2003) 391 [hep-ph/0206071] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    CMS collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al., Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at 7 TeV in events with jets and missing transverse energy, Phys. Lett. B 698 (2011) 196 [arXiv:1101.1628] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for supersymmetry using final states with one lepton, jets and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector in \( \sqrt {s} = 7 \) TeV pp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 131802 [arXiv:1102.2357] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for squarks and gluinos using final states with jets and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector in \( \sqrt {s} = 7 \) TeV proton-proton collisions, Phys. Lett. B 701 (2011) 186 [arXiv:1102.5290] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Strumia, Implications of first LHC results, arXiv:1107.1259 [INSPIRE].
  13. [13]
    O. Buchmueller et al., Supersymmetry and dark matter in light of LHC 2010 and Xenon100 data, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1722 [arXiv:1106.2529] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for new phenomena in final states with large jet multiplicities and missing transverse momentum using \( \sqrt {s} = 7 \) TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 11 (2011) 099 [arXiv:1110.2299] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in all-hadronic events with α T, Technical Report CMS-PAS-SUS-11-003, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2011).
  16. [16]
    T. Li, J.A. Maxin, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, Profumo di SUSY: suggestive correlations in the ATLAS and CMS High Jet Multiplicity Data, arXiv:1111.4204 [INSPIRE].
  17. [17]
    XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark matter results from 100 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 131302 [arXiv:1104.2549] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    G. Polesello and D. Tovey, Constraining SUSY dark matter with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, JHEP 05 (2004) 071 [hep-ph/0403047] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Nojiri, G. Polesello and D. Tovey, Constraining dark matter in the MSSM at the LHC, JHEP 03 (2006) 063 [hep-ph/0512204] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    T. Li, J.A. Maxin, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, The ultra-high jet multiplicity signal of stringy No-Scale F-SU(5) at the \( \sqrt {s} = {7} \) TeV LHC, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 076003 [arXiv:1103.4160] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    T. Li, J.A. Maxin, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, The golden point of No-Scale and No-Parameter \( \mathcal{F} \) -SU(5), Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 056015 [arXiv:1007.5100] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    T. Li, J.A. Maxin, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, The golden strip of correlated top quark, gaugino and vectorlike mass In No-Scale, No-Parameter F-SU(5), Phys. Lett. B 699 (2011) 164 [arXiv:1009.2981] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    T. Li, J.A. Maxin, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, Super No-Scale F-SU(5): a dynamic determination of M 1/2 and tan β, Phys. Lett. B 703 (2011) 469 [arXiv:1010.4550] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    T. Li, J.A. Maxin, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, Blueprints of the No-Scale multiverse at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 056016 [arXiv:1101.2197] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    T. Li, J.A. Maxin, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, Ultra high jet signals from stringy No-Scale supergravity, arXiv:1103.2362 [INSPIRE].
  26. [26]
    T. Li, J.A. Maxin, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, The unification of dynamical determination and bare minimal phenomenological constraints in No-Scale \( \mathcal{F} \) -SU(5), arXiv:1105.3988 [INSPIRE].
  27. [27]
    T. Li, J.A. Maxin, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, The race for supersymmetric dark matter at XENON100 and the LHC: stringy correlations from No-Scale \( \mathcal{F} \) -SU(5), arXiv:1106.1165 [INSPIRE].
  28. [28]
    T. Li, J.A. Maxin, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, Prospects for discovery of supersymmetric No-Scale F-SU(5) at the once and future LHC, Nucl. Phys. B 859 (2012) 96 [arXiv:1107.3825] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    T. Li, J.A. Maxin, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, Has SUSY gone undetected in 9-jet events? A ten-fold enhancement in the LHC signal efficiency, arXiv:1108.5169 [INSPIRE].
  30. [30]
    T. Li, J.A. Maxin, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, The F-landscape: dynamically determining the multiverse, arXiv:1111.0236 [INSPIRE].
  31. [31]
    T. Li, J.A. Maxin, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, A Higgs mass shift to 125 GeV and a multi-jet supersymmetry signal: miracle of the flippons at the \( \sqrt {s} = {7} \) TeV LHC, arXiv:1112.3024 [INSPIRE].
  32. [32]
    S.M. Barr, A new symmetry breaking pattern for SO(10) and proton decay, Phys. Lett. B 112 (1982) 219 [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    J. Derendinger, J.E. Kim and D.V. Nanopoulos, Anti-SU(5), Phys. Lett. B 139 (1984) 170 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    I. Antoniadis, J.R. Ellis, J. Hagelin and D.V. Nanopoulos, Supersymmetric flipped SU(5) revitalized, Phys. Lett. B 194 (1987) 231 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    J. Jiang, T. Li and D.V. Nanopoulos, Testable flipped SU(5) × U(1)X Models, Nucl. Phys. B 772 (2007) 49 [hep-ph/0610054] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    J. Jiang, T. Li, D.V. Nanopoulos and D. Xie, F-SU(5), Phys. Lett. B 677 (2009) 322 [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    J. Jiang, T. Li, D.V. Nanopoulos and D. Xie, Flipped SU(5) × U(1)X models from F-theory, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 195 [arXiv:0905.3394] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    T. Li, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, Elements of F-ast proton decay, Nucl. Phys. B 846 (2011) 43 [arXiv:1003.2570] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    T. Li, J.A. Maxin, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, Dark matter, proton decay and other phenomenological constraints in \( \mathcal{F} \) -SU(5), Nucl. Phys. B 848 (2011) 314 [arXiv:1003.4186] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    E. Cremmer, S. Ferrara, C. Kounnas and D.V. Nanopoulos, Naturally vanishing cosmological constant in N = 1 supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 133 (1983) 61 [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    J.R. Ellis, A. Lahanas, D.V. Nanopoulos and K. Tamvakis, No-Scale supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Lett. B 134 (1984) 429 [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    J.R. Ellis, C. Kounnas and D.V. Nanopoulos, Phenomenological SU(1, 1) supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 241 (1984) 406 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    J.R. Ellis, C. Kounnas and D.V. Nanopoulos, No Scale supersymmetric guts, Nucl. Phys. B 247 (1984) 373.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    A. Lahanas and D.V. Nanopoulos, The road to No Scale supergravity, Phys. Rept. 145 (1987) 1 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    D.V. Nanopoulos, Fenomenology, hep-ph/0211128 [INSPIRE].
  46. [46]
    E. Witten, Dimensional reduction of superstring models, Phys. Lett. B 155 (1985) 151 [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    T.-j. Li, J.L. Lopez and D.V. Nanopoulos, Compactifications of M-theory and their phenomenological consequences, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 2602 [hep-ph/9704247] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    J.R. Ellis, D.V. Nanopoulos and K.A. Olive, Lower limits on soft supersymmetry breaking scalar masses, Phys. Lett. B 525 (2002) 308 [hep-ph/0109288] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    J. Ellis, A. Mustafayev and K.A. Olive, Resurrecting No-Scale supergravity phenomenology, Eur. Phys. J. C 69 (2010) 219 [arXiv:1004.5399] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    J.L. Lopez, D.V. Nanopoulos and K.-j. Yuan, The search for a realistic flipped SU(5) string model, Nucl. Phys. B 399 (1993) 654 [hep-th/9203025] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    LEP Working Group for Higgs boson searches, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL collaboration, R. Barate et al., Search for the standard model Higgs boson at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 565 (2003) 61 [hep-ex/0306033] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    Particle Data Group collaboration, W.M. Yao et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 33 (2006) 1.ADSGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    T. Li, J.A. Maxin, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, Natural predictions for the Higgs boson mass and supersymmetric contributions to rare processes, Phys. Lett. B 708 (2012) 93 [arXiv:1109.2110] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    B. Allanach et al., The Snowmass points and slopes: benchmarks for SUSY searches, Eur. Phys. J. C 25 (2002) 113 [hep-ph/0202233] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    T. Stelzer and W. Long, Automatic generation of tree level helicity amplitudes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 81 (1994) 357 [hep-ph/9401258] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    J. Alwall et al., MadGraph/MadEvent collider event simulation suite (2011), http://madgraph.hep.uiuc.edu/.
  57. [57]
    J. Alwall et al., MadGraph/MadEvent v4: the new web generation, JHEP 09 (2007) 028 [arXiv:0706.2334] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. [58]
    T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. [59]
    J. Conway et al., PGS4: Pretty Good (Detector) Simulation (2009), http://www.physics.ucdavis.edu/~conway/research/.
  60. [60]
    T. Li, J.A. Maxin, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, CutLHCO: a tool for detector selection cuts (2011), http://www.joelwalker.net/code/cut lhco.tar.gz.
  61. [61]
    T. Li, J.A. Maxin, D.V. Nanopoulos and J.W. Walker, Mathematica notebooks for No-Scale \( \mathcal{F} \)-SU(5) LSP analysis (2011), http://www.joelwalker.net/code/lsp analysis.tar.gz.
  62. [62]
    G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with MicrOMEGAs 2.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 747 [arXiv:0803.2360] [INSPIRE].ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. [63]
    A. Djouadi, J.-L. Kneur and G. Moultaka, SuSpect: A Fortran code for the supersymmetric and Higgs particle spectrum in the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 (2007) 426 [hep-ph/0211331] [INSPIRE].ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SISSA, Trieste, Italy 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tianjun Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • James A. Maxin
    • 2
  • Dimitri V. Nanopoulos
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Joel W. Walker
    • 5
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingP.R. China
  2. 2.George P. and Cynthia W. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and AstronomyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  3. 3.Astroparticle Physics Group, Houston Advanced Research Center (HARC)WoodlandsUSA
  4. 4.Division of Natural Sciences, Academy of AthensAthensGreece
  5. 5.Department of PhysicsSam Houston State UniversityHuntsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations