Advertisement

Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2012:69 | Cite as

Flavor of quiver-like realizations of effective supersymmetry

  • Roberto Auzzi
  • Amit Giveon
  • Sven Bjarke Gudnason
Article

Abstract

We present a class of supersymmetric models which address the flavor puzzle and have an inverted hierarchy of sfermions. Their construction involves quiver-like models with link fields in generic representations. The magnitude of Standard-Model parameters is obtained naturally and a relatively heavy Higgs boson is allowed without fine tuning. Collider signatures of such models are possibly within the reach of LHC in the near future.

Keywords

Supersymmetry Phenomenology 

References

  1. [1]
    Y. Kats, P. Meade, M. Reece and D. Shih, The status of GMSB after 1/f b at the LHC, arXiv:1110.6444 [INSPIRE].
  2. [2]
    S. Dimopoulos and G. Giudice, Naturalness constraints in supersymmetric theories with nonuniversal soft terms, Phys. Lett. B 357 (1995) 573 [hep-ph/9507282] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A.G. Cohen, D. Kaplan and A. Nelson, The more minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Lett. B 388 (1996) 588 [hep-ph/9607394] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Barbieri, E. Bertuzzo, M. Farina, P. Lodone and D. Pappadopulo, A non standard supersymmetric spectrum, JHEP 08 (2010) 024 [arXiv:1004.2256] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. Barbieri, E. Bertuzzo, M. Farina, P. Lodone and D. Zhuridov, Minimal flavour violation with hierarchical squark masses, JHEP 12 (2010) 070 [Erratum ibid. 1102 (2011) 044] [arXiv:1011.0730] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. Barbieri, G. Isidori, J. Jones-Perez, P. Lodone and D.M. Straub, U(2) and minimal flavour violation in supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1725 [arXiv:1105.2296] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    C. Brust, A. Katz, S. Lawrence and R. Sundrum, SUSY, the third generation and the LHC, arXiv:1110.6670 [INSPIRE].
  8. [8]
    M. Papucci, J.T. Ruderman and A. Weiler, Natural SUSY endures, arXiv:1110.6926 [INSPIRE].
  9. [9]
    A. Delgado and M. Quirós, The least supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 015001 [arXiv:1111.0528] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    C. Froggatt and H.B. Nielsen, Hierarchy of quark masses, Cabibbo angles and CP-violation, Nucl. Phys. B 147 (1979) 277 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    A.E. Nelson and M.J. Strassler, Suppressing flavor anarchy, JHEP 09 (2000) 030 [hep-ph/0006251] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    A.E. Nelson and M.J. Strassler, Exact results for supersymmetric renormalization and the supersymmetric flavor problem, JHEP 07 (2002) 021 [hep-ph/0104051] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    O. Aharony, L. Berdichevsky, M. Berkooz, Y. Hochberg and D. Robles-Llana, Inverted sparticle hierarchies from natural particle hierarchies, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 085006 [arXiv:1001.0637] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    N. Craig, D. Green and A. Katz, (De)Constructing a natural and flavorful supersymmetric standard model, JHEP 07 (2011) 045 [arXiv:1103.3708] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    N. Arkani-Hamed, M.A. Luty and J. Terning, Composite quarks and leptons from dynamical supersymmetry breaking without messengers, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 015004 [hep-ph/9712389] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    M.A. Luty and J. Terning, Improved single sector supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 075006 [hep-ph/9812290] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    M. Gabella, T. Gherghetta and J. Giedt, A gravity dual and LHC study of single-sector supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 055001 [arXiv:0704.3571] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    S. Franco and S. Kachru, Single-sector supersymmetry breaking in supersymmetric QCD, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 095020 [arXiv:0907.2689] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    N. Craig, R. Essig, S. Franco, S. Kachru and G. Torroba, Dynamical supersymmetry breaking, with flavor, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 075015 [arXiv:0911.2467] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    P. Meade, N. Seiberg and D. Shih, General gauge mediation, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 177 (2009) 143 [arXiv:0801.3278] [INSPIRE].ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    D. Marques, Generalized messenger sector for gauge mediation of supersymmetry breaking and the soft spectrum, JHEP 03 (2009) 038 [arXiv:0901.1326] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    T.T. Dumitrescu, Z. Komargodski, N. Seiberg and D. Shih, General messenger gauge mediation, JHEP 05 (2010) 096 [arXiv:1003.2661] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    D. Green, A. Katz and Z. Komargodski, Direct gaugino mediation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 061801 [arXiv:1008.2215] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    R. Auzzi, A. Giveon, S.B. Gudnason and T. Shacham, On the spectrum of direct gaugino mediation, JHEP 09 (2011) 108 [arXiv:1107.1414] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    D. Kaplan, G.D. Kribs and M. Schmaltz, Supersymmetry breaking through transparent extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 035010 [hep-ph/9911293] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Z. Chacko, M.A. Luty, A.E. Nelson and E. Ponton, Gaugino mediated supersymmetry breaking, JHEP 01 (2000) 003 [hep-ph/9911323] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    C. Csáki, J. Erlich, C. Grojean and G.D. Kribs, 4D constructions of supersymmetric extra dimensions and gaugino mediation, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 015003 [hep-ph/0106044] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    H. Cheng, D. Kaplan, M. Schmaltz and W. Skiba, Deconstructing gaugino mediation, Phys. Lett. B 515 (2001) 395 [hep-ph/0106098] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    M. McGarrie, General gauge mediation and deconstruction, JHEP 11 (2010) 152 [arXiv:1009.0012] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    R. Auzzi and A. Giveon, The Sparticle spectrum in Minimal gaugino-Gauge Mediation, JHEP 10 (2010) 088 [arXiv:1009.1714] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    R. Auzzi and A. Giveon, Superpartner spectrum of minimal gaugino-gauge mediation, JHEP 01 (2011) 003 [arXiv:1011.1664] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    M. Sudano, General gaugino mediation, arXiv:1009.2086 [INSPIRE].
  33. [33]
    M. McGarrie, Hybrid gauge mediation, JHEP 09 (2011) 138 [arXiv:1101.5158] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    R. Auzzi, A. Giveon and S.B. Gudnason, Mediation of supersymmetry breaking in quivers, JHEP 12 (2011) 016 [arXiv:1110.1453] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    S.P. Martin, Generalized messengers of supersymmetry breaking and the sparticle mass spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 3177 [hep-ph/9608224] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    S.P. Martin and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations for soft supersymmetry breaking couplings, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 2282 [Erratum ibid. D 78 (2008) 039903] [hep-ph/9311340] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    B. Allanach, SOFTSUSY: a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143 (2002) 305 [hep-ph/0104145] [INSPIRE].ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    J.S. Hagelin, S. Kelley and T. Tanaka, Supersymmetric flavor changing neutral currents: exact amplitudes and phenomenological analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 415 (1994) 293 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    F. Gabbiani, E. Gabrielli, A. Masiero and L. Silvestrini, A complete analysis of FCNC and CP constraints in general SUSY extensions of the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 477 (1996) 321 [hep-ph/9604387] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    A.E. Nelson and D. Wright, Horizontal, anomalous U(1) symmetry for the more minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 1598 [hep-ph/9702359] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    M. Ciuchini et al., Delta M (K) and epsilon(K) in SUSY at the next-to-leading order, JHEP 10 (1998) 008 [hep-ph/9808328] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    UTfit collaboration, M. Bona et al., Model-independent constraints on ΔF = 2 operators and the scale of new physics, JHEP 03 (2008) 049 [arXiv:0707.0636] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    D. Becirevic et al., B d - B d mixing and the B d → J/ψK s asymmetry in general SUSY models, Nucl. Phys. B 634 (2002) 105 [hep-ph/0112303] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    L.L. Everett, G.L. Kane, S. Rigolin, L.-T. Wang and T.T. Wang, Alternative approach to b→sγ in the uMSSM,JHEP 01(2002) 022 [hep-ph/0112126] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    E. Lunghi and J. Matias, Huge right-handed current effects in B → K (Kπ)ℓ + in supersymmetry, JHEP 04 (2007) 058 [hep-ph/0612166] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    G.F. Giudice, M. Nardecchia and A. Romanino, Hierarchical soft terms and flavor physics, Nucl. Phys. B 813 (2009) 156 [arXiv:0812.3610] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    A.J. Buras and D. Guadagnoli, Correlations among new CP-violating effects in ΔF = 2 observables, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 033005 [arXiv:0805.3887] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    M. Misiak et al., Estimate of B( B → X s γ) at O(α s ), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 022002 [hep-ph/0609232] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    K. Babu, TASI lectures on flavor physics, arXiv:0910.2948 [INSPIRE].
  50. [50]
    ATLAS collaboration, Combination of Higgs boson searches with up to 4.9 fb −1 of pp collisions data taken at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2011-163 (2011).Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    CMS collaboration, Combination of SM Higgs searches, CMS-PAS-HIG-11-032 (2011).Google Scholar
  52. [52]
    P. Batra, A. Delgado, D.E. Kaplan and T.M. Tait, The Higgs mass bound in gauge extensions of the minimal supersymmetric standard model, JHEP 02 (2004) 043 [hep-ph/0309149] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    N. Arkani-Hamed, A.G. Cohen and H. Georgi, Accelerated unification, hep-th/0108089 [INSPIRE].
  54. [54]
    A. Maloney, A. Pierce and J.G. Wacker, D-terms, unification and the Higgs mass, JHEP 06 (2006) 034 [hep-ph/0409127] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    A. Arvanitaki and G. Villadoro, A non standard model Higgs at the LHC as a sign of naturalness, arXiv:1112.4835 [INSPIRE].
  56. [56]
    J.L. Evans, M. Ibe and T.T. Yanagida, Relatively heavy Higgs boson in more generic gauge mediation, Phys. Lett. B 705 (2011) 342 [arXiv:1107.3006] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SISSA, Trieste, Italy 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Auzzi
    • 1
  • Amit Giveon
    • 1
  • Sven Bjarke Gudnason
    • 1
  1. 1.Racah Institute of PhysicsThe Hebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations