There are recent considerations to increase the photomultiplier density in the IceCube detector array beyond that of DeepCore, which will lead to a lower detector energy threshold and a relatively huge fiducial mass for the neutrino detection. This initiative is known as “Precision IceCube Next Generation Upgrade” (PINGU). We discuss the possibility to send a neutrino beam from one of the major accelerator laboratories in the Northern hemisphere to such a detector. Such an experiment would be unique in the sense that it would be the only neutrino beam where the baseline crosses the Earth’s outer core. We study the detector requirements for a beta beam, a neutrino factory beam, and a superbeam, where we consider the cases of both small θ13 and large θ13, as suggested by the recent T2K and Double Chooz results. We illustrate that a flavor-clean beta beam best suits the requirements of such a detector, in particular, that PINGU may replace a magic baseline detector for small values of θ13 — even in the absence of any energy resolution capability. For large θ13, however, a single-baseline beta beam experiment cannot compete if it is constrained by the CERN-SPS. For a neutrino factory, because of the missing charge identification possibility in the detector, a very good energy resolution is required. If this can be achieved, especially a low energy neutrino factory, which does not suffer from the tau contamination, may be an interesting option for large θ13. For the superbeam, where we consider the LBNE beam as a reference, electron neutrino flavor identification and statistics are two of the primary limitations. Finally, we demonstrate that in principle the neutrino factory and superbeam options may measure the density of the Earth’s core at a sub percent level for sin2 2θ13 ≳ 0.01.
SNO collaboration, Q. Ahmad et al., Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett.89 (2002) 011301 [nucl-ex/0204008] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
DOUBLE-CHOOZ collaboration, Y. Abe et al., Indication for the disappearance of reactor electron antineutrinos in the Double CHOOZ experiment, arXiv:1112.6353 [INSPIRE].
G. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, A. Palazzo and A. Rotunno, Evidence of θ13¿0 from global neutrino data analysis, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 053007 [arXiv:1106.6028]. Slightly revised text/ results unchanged. To appear in Phys. Rev. D [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
T. Schwetz, M. Tortola and J. Valle, Where we are on θ13: addendum to ’Global neutrino data and recent reactor fluxes: status of three-flavour oscillation parameters’, New J. Phys.13 (2011)109401 [arXiv:1108.1376] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. Huber, M. Lindner, M. Rolinec, T. Schwetz and W. Winter, Prospects of accelerator and reactor neutrino oscillation experiments for the coming ten years, Phys. Rev.D 70 (2004) 073014 [hep-ph/0403068] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
LSND collaboration, A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Evidence for neutrino oscillations from the observation of anti-neutrino(electron) appearance in a anti-neutrino(muon) beam, Phys. Rev.D 64 (2001) 112007 [hep-ex/0104049] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
OPERA collaboration, T. Adam et al., Measurement of the neutrino velocity with the OPERA detector in the CNGS beam, arXiv:1109.4897 [INSPIRE].
ISS Physics Working Group collaboration, A. Bandyopadhyay et al., Physics at a future Neutrino Factory and super-beam facility, Rept. Prog. Phys.72 (2009) 106201 [arXiv:0710.4947]. 370 pages, 121 postscript figures [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISS Detector Working Group collaboration, T. Abe et al., Detectors and flux instrumentation for future neutrino facilities, 2009 JINST 4 T05001 [arXiv:0712.4129]. Detector report of the International Scoping Study of a future Neutrino Factory and Super-Beam facility, 86 pages, 49 figures [INSPIRE].
ISS Accelerator Working Group collaboration, M. Apollonio et al., Accelerator design concept for future neutrino facilities, 2009 JINST 4 P07001 [arXiv:0802.4023] [INSPIRE].
D. Fargion, D. D’Armiento, P. Desiati and P. Paggi, Beaming neutrino and antineutrinos across the Earth to focus muon-tau flavor mixing and to disentangle CPT violation puzzle, arXiv:1012.3245 [INSPIRE].
IDS-NF collaboration, S. Choubey et al., International Design Study for the Neutrino Factory, Interim Design Report, arXiv:1112.2853 [INSPIRE].
A. Cervera, A. Donini, M. Gavela, J. Gomez Cadenas, P. Hernández, et al., Golden measurements at a neutrino factory, Nucl. Phys.B 579 (2000) 17 [Erratum ibid.B 593 (2001)731-732] [hep-ph/0002108] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. Huber, M. Lindner and W. Winter, Simulation of long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES (General Long Baseline Experiment Simulator), Comput. Phys. Commun.167 (2005) 195 [hep-ph/0407333] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. Huber, J. Kopp, M. Lindner, M. Rolinec and W. Winter, New features in the simulation of neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES 3.0: General Long Baseline Experiment Simulator, Comput. Phys. Commun.177 (2007) 432 [hep-ph/0701187] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
A. Cervera, A. Laing, J. Martin-Albo and F. Soler, Performance of the MIND detector at a Neutrino Factory using realistic muon reconstruction, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A 624 (2010) 601 [arXiv:1004.0358] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
A. Laing, Optimization of Detectors for the Golden Channel at a Neutrino Factory, Ph.D. thesis, Glasgow University (2010).Google Scholar
D. Beavis et al., Proposal of BNL AGS E-889, BNL Tech. Rep. (1995).Google Scholar
P. Huber and J. Kopp, Two experiments for the price of one? - The role of the second oscillation maximum in long baseline neutrino experiments, JHEP03 (2011) 013 [Erratum ibid.1105 (2011) 024] [arXiv:1010.3706] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
J.F. Beacom, N.F. Bell, D. Hooper, S. Pakvasa and T.J. Weiler, Measuring flavor ratios of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos, Phys. Rev.D 68 (2003) 093005 [Erratum ibid.D 72 (2005)019901] [hep-ph/0307025] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar