Advertisement

Complexity geometry and Schwarzian dynamics

  • Henry W. LinEmail author
  • Leonard Susskind
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

A celebrated feature of SYK-like models is that at low energies, their dynamics reduces to that of a single variable. In many setups, this “Schwarzian” variable can be interpreted as the extremal volume of the dual black hole, and the resulting dynamics is simply that of a 1D Newtonian particle in an exponential potential. On the complexity side, geodesics on a simplified version of Nielsen’s complexity geometry also behave like a 1D particle in a potential given by the angular momentum barrier. The agreement between the effective actions of volume and complexity succinctly summarizes various strands of evidence that complexity is closely related to the dynamics of black holes.

Keywords

2D Gravity AdS-CFT Correspondence 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited

References

  1. [1]
    L. Susskind, Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons, Fortsch. Phys.64 (2016) 44 [arXiv:1403.5695] [INSPIRE].
  2. [2]
    L. Susskind, Entanglement is not enough, Fortsch. Phys.64 (2016) 49 [arXiv:1411.0690] [INSPIRE].
  3. [3]
    D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 126007 [arXiv:1406.2678] [INSPIRE].
  4. [4]
    D.A. Roberts, D. Stanford and A. Streicher, Operator growth in the SYK model, JHEP06 (2018) 122 [arXiv:1802.02633] [INSPIRE].
  5. [5]
    L. Susskind, Why do Things Fall?, arXiv:1802.01198 [INSPIRE].
  6. [6]
    A.R. Brown, H. Gharibyan, A. Streicher, L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and Y. Zhao, Falling Toward Charged Black Holes, Phys. Rev.D 98 (2018) 126016 [arXiv:1804.04156] [INSPIRE].
  7. [7]
    X.-L. Qi and A. Streicher, Quantum Epidemiology: Operator Growth, Thermal Effects and SYK, JHEP08 (2019) 012 [arXiv:1810.11958] [INSPIRE].
  8. [8]
    H.W. Lin, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao, Symmetries Near the Horizon, JHEP08 (2019) 049 [arXiv:1904.12820] [INSPIRE].
  9. [9]
    S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.70 (1993) 3339 [cond-mat/9212030] [INSPIRE].
  10. [10]
    A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, talks at Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics (KITP), Santa Barbara U.S.A. (2015), http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/, http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev2/.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev.D 94 (2016) 106002 [arXiv:1604.07818] [INSPIRE].
  12. [12]
    A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, Models of AdS2backreaction and holography, JHEP11 (2015) 014 [arXiv:1402.6334] [INSPIRE].
  13. [13]
    K. Jensen, Chaos in AdS2Holography, Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016) 111601 [arXiv:1605.06098] [INSPIRE].
  14. [14]
    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space, PTEP2016 (2016) 12C104 [arXiv:1606.01857] [INSPIRE].
  15. [15]
    J. Engelsöy, T.G. Mertens and H. Verlinde, An investigation of AdS2backreaction and holography, JHEP07 (2016) 139 [arXiv:1606.03438] [INSPIRE].
  16. [16]
    M.R. Dowling and M.A. Nielsen, The geometry of quantum computation, Quantum Inf. Comput.8 (2008) 861 [quant-ph/0701004].
  17. [17]
    A.R. Brown and L. Susskind, Second law of quantum complexity, Phys. Rev.D 97 (2018) 086015 [arXiv:1701.01107] [INSPIRE].
  18. [18]
    A.R. Brown, L. Susskind and Y. Zhao, Quantum Complexity and Negative Curvature, Phys. Rev.D 95 (2017) 045010 [arXiv:1608.02612] [INSPIRE].
  19. [19]
    J. Maldacena and X.-L. Qi, Eternal traversable wormhole, arXiv:1804.00491 [INSPIRE].
  20. [20]
    L. Susskind, Complexity and Newton’s Laws, arXiv:1904.12819 [INSPIRE].
  21. [21]
    D. Harlow and D. Jafferis, The Factorization Problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity, arXiv:1804.01081 [INSPIRE].
  22. [22]
    I. Kourkoulou and J. Maldacena, Pure states in the SYK model and nearly-AdS2gravity, arXiv:1707.02325 [INSPIRE].
  23. [23]
    E.P. Verlinde, On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton, JHEP04 (2011) 029 [arXiv:1001.0785] [INSPIRE].
  24. [24]
    A.R. Brown, H. Gharibyan, H.W. Lin, L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and Y. Zhao, Complexity of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, Phys. Rev.D 99 (2019) 046016 [arXiv:1810.08741] [INSPIRE].
  25. [25]
    K. Goto, H. Marrochio, R.C. Myers, L. Queimada and B. Yoshida, Holographic Complexity Equals Which Action?, JHEP02 (2019) 160 [arXiv:1901.00014] [INSPIRE].
  26. [26]
    A.R. Brown and L. Susskind, Complexity geometry of a single qubit, Phys. Rev.D 100 (2019) 046020 [arXiv:1903.12621] [INSPIRE].
  27. [27]
    P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral, arXiv:1903.11115 [INSPIRE].
  28. [28]
    H.W. Lin, Cayley graphs and complexity geometry, JHEP02 (2019) 063 [arXiv:1808.06620] [INSPIRE].

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jadwin HallPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  2. 2.Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics and Department of PhysicsStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.GoogleMountain ViewUSA

Personalised recommendations