Advertisement

Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2019:226 | Cite as

On the relationship between gauge dependence and IR divergences in the ℏ-expansion of the effective potential

  • Andreas EkstedtEmail author
  • Johan Löfgren
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Perturbative calculations of the effective potential evaluated at a broken minimum, Vmin, are plagued by difficulties. It is hard to get a finite and gauge invariant result for Vmin. In fact, the methods proposed to deal with gauge dependence and ir divergences are orthogonal in their approaches. Gauge dependence is dealt with through the ℏ-expansion, which establishes and maintains a strict loop-order separation of terms. On the other hand, ir divergences seem to require a resummation that mixes the different loop orders. In this paper we test these methods on Fermi gauge Abelian Higgs at two loops. We find that the resummation procedure is not capable of removing all divergences. Surprisingly, the ℏ-expansion seems to be able to deal with both the divergences and the gauge dependence. In order to isolate the physical part of Vmin, we are guided by the separation of scales that motivated the resummation procedure; the key result is that only hard momentum modes contribute to Vmin.

Keywords

Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking Gauge Symmetry 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    A. Andreassen, W. Frost and M.D. Schwartz, Consistent Use of Effective Potentials, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 016009 [arXiv:1408.0287] [INSPIRE].
  2. [2]
    H.H. Patel and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Baryon Washout, Electroweak Phase Transition and Perturbation Theory, JHEP 07 (2011) 029 [arXiv:1101.4665] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    S.P. Martin, Taming the Goldstone contributions to the effective potential, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 016013 [arXiv:1406.2355] [INSPIRE].
  4. [4]
    J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa and T. Konstandin, Taming Infrared Divergences in the Effective Potential, JHEP 08 (2014) 034 [arXiv:1406.2652] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    S.R. Coleman and E.J. Weinberg, Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 1888 [INSPIRE].
  6. [6]
    J.R. Espinosa, M. Garny and T. Konstandin, Interplay of Infrared Divergences and Gauge-Dependence of the Effective Potential, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 055026 [arXiv:1607.08432] [INSPIRE].
  7. [7]
    J.R. Espinosa and T. Konstandin, Resummation of Goldstone Infrared Divergences: A Proof to All Orders, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 056020 [arXiv:1712.08068] [INSPIRE].
  8. [8]
    N.K. Nielsen, On the Gauge Dependence of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 101 (1975) 173 [INSPIRE].
  9. [9]
    M. Laine, Gauge dependence of the high temperature two loop effective potential for the Higgs field, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 4525 [hep-ph/9411252] [INSPIRE].
  10. [10]
    K. Farakos, K. Kajantie, K. Rummukainen and M.E. Shaposhnikov, 3-D physics and the electroweak phase transition: A Framework for lattice Monte Carlo analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 442 (1995) 317 [hep-lat/9412091] [INSPIRE].
  11. [11]
    B.R. Holstein and J.F. Donoghue, Classical physics and quantum loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 201602 [hep-th/0405239] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    S.P. Martin and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations for soft supersymmetry breaking couplings, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 2282 [Erratum ibid. D 78 (2008) 039903] [hep-ph/9311340] [INSPIRE].
  13. [13]
    M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two Loop Renormalization Group Equations in a General Quantum Field Theory. 3. Scalar Quartic Couplings, Nucl. Phys. B 249 (1985) 70 [INSPIRE].
  14. [14]
    M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two Loop Renormalization Group Equations in a General Quantum Field Theory. 1. Wave Function Renormalization, Nucl. Phys. B 222 (1983) 83 [INSPIRE].
  15. [15]
    D. Metaxas and E.J. Weinberg, Gauge independence of the bubble nucleation rate in theories with radiative symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 836 [hep-ph/9507381] [INSPIRE].
  16. [16]
    S.P. Martin and H.H. Patel, Two-loop effective potential for generalized gauge fixing, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 076008 [arXiv:1808.07615] [INSPIRE].
  17. [17]
    J. Ellis, TikZ-Feynman: Feynman diagrams with TikZ, Comput. Phys. Commun. 210 (2017) 103 [arXiv:1601.05437] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    A.V. Smirnov, FIRE5: a C++ implementation of Feynman Integral REduction, Comput. Phys. Commun. 189 (2015) 182 [arXiv:1408.2372] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations