Advertisement

Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2019:136 | Cite as

Pfaffian particles and strings in SO(2N) gauge theories

  • Michael TeperEmail author
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

We introduce (generalised) Pfaffian operators into our lattice calculations of the mass spectra and confining string tensions of SO(2N) gauge theories, complementing the conventional trace operators used in previous lattice calculations. In SO(6) the corresponding ‘Pfaffian’ particles match the negative charge conjugation particles of SU(4), thus resolving a puzzle arising from the observation that SO(6) and SU(4) have the same Lie algebra. The same holds true (but much more trivially) for SO(2) and U(1). For SO(4) the Pfaffian particles are degenerate with, but orthogonal to, those obtained with the usual single trace operators. That is to say, there is a doubling of the spectrum, as one might expect given that the Lie algebra of SO(4) is the same as that of SU(2) × SU(2). Additional SO(8) and SO(10) calculations of the Pfaffian spectrum confirm the naive expectation that these masses increase with N, so that they cease to play a role in the physics of SO(N) gauge theories as N → ∞. We also calculate the energies of Pfaffian ‘strings’ in these gauge theories. Although all our lattice calculations are for gauge theories in D = 2 + 1, similar conclusions should hold for D = 3 + 1.

Keywords

Nonperturbative Effects Lattice Quantum Field Theory 1/N Expansion 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    R. Lau and M. Teper, SO(N) gauge theories in 2 + 1 dimensions: glueball spectra and confinement, JHEP 10 (2017) 022 [arXiv:1701.06941] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    R. Lau and M. Teper, The deconfining phase transition of SO(N) gauge theories in 2 + 1 dimensions, JHEP 03 (2016) 072 [arXiv:1510.07841] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Teper, SO(4), SO(3) and SU(2) gauge theories in 2 + 1 dimensions: comparing glueball spectra and string tensions, arXiv:1801.05693 [INSPIRE].
  4. [4]
    A. Athenodorou and M. Teper, SU(N) gauge theories in 2 + 1 dimensions: glueball spectra and k-string tensions, JHEP 02 (2017) 015 [arXiv:1609.03873] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    G. ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 72 (1974) 461 [INSPIRE].
  6. [6]
    C. Lovelace, Universality at large N, Nucl. Phys. B 201 (1982) 333 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Teper, Spinorial flux tubes in SO(N) gauge theories in 2 + 1 dimensions, JHEP 11 (2018) 132 [arXiv:1712.01185] [INSPIRE].
  8. [8]
    E. Witten, Baryons and branes in anti-de Sitter space, JHEP 07 (1998) 006 [hep-th/9805112] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Teper, An Improved Method for Lattice Glueball Calculations, Phys. Lett. B 183 (1987) 345 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. Teper, SU(N) gauge theories in (2 + 1)-dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 014512 [hep-lat/9804008] [INSPIRE].
  11. [11]
    H.B. Meyer and M. Teper, High spin glueballs from the lattice, Nucl. Phys. B 658 (2003) 113 [hep-lat/0212026] [INSPIRE].
  12. [12]
    H.B. Meyer, Glueball Regge trajectories, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford U.K. (2005) [hep-lat/0508002] [INSPIRE].
  13. [13]
    A. Athenodorou, B. Bringoltz and M. Teper, Closed flux tubes and their string description in D = 2 + 1 SU(N) gauge theories, JHEP 05 (2011) 042 [arXiv:1103.5854] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. Athenodorou and M. Teper, Closed flux tubes in D = 2 + 1 SU(N) gauge theories: dynamics and effective string description, JHEP 10 (2016) 093 [arXiv:1602.07634] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    O. Aharony and Z. Komargodski, The Effective Theory of Long Strings, JHEP 05 (2013) 118 [arXiv:1302.6257] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    O. Aharony and E. Karzbrun, On the effective action of confining strings, JHEP 06 (2009) 012 [arXiv:0903.1927] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger and V. Gorbenko, Effective String Theory Revisited, JHEP 09 (2012) 044 [arXiv:1203.1054] [INSPIRE].
  18. [18]
    A.M. Polyakov, Quark Confinement and Topology of Gauge Groups, Nucl. Phys. B 120 (1977) 429 [INSPIRE].
  19. [19]
    A.M. Polyakov, Gauge fields and strings, Harwood Academic Publishers (1987).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    R.J. Wensley and J.D. Stack, Monopoles and Confinement in Three-dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 (1989) 1764 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    R.J. Wensley, Monopoles and U(1) lattice gauge theory, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana Illinois U.S.A. (1989) [ILL-TH-89-25] [INSPIRE].
  22. [22]
    T. Copeland, Monopoles and confinement in U(1) lattice gauge theory, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford U.K. (1990).Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    B. Lucini and M. Teper, Confining strings in SU(N) gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 105019 [hep-lat/0107007] [INSPIRE].
  24. [24]
    A. Athenodorou, B. Bringoltz and M. Teper, On the spectrum of closed k = 2 flux tubes in D = 2 + 1 SU(N) gauge theories, JHEP 05 (2009) 019 [arXiv:0812.0334] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger and V. Gorbenko, Evidence from Lattice Data for a New Particle on the Worldsheet of the QCD Flux Tube, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 062006 [arXiv:1301.2325] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    A. Athenodorou and M. Teper, Closed flux tubes in higher representations and their string description in D = 2 + 1 SU(N) gauge theories, JHEP 06 (2013) 053 [arXiv:1303.5946] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, Clarendon LaboratoryUniversity of OxfordOxfordU.K.
  2. 2.All Souls CollegeUniversity of OxfordOxfordU.K.

Personalised recommendations