Advertisement

Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2019:133 | Cite as

Upper and lower bounds on the integrated null energy in gravity

  • Stefan Leichenauer
  • Adam LevineEmail author
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

We prove a lower bound on the integrated null energy along achronal geodesic segments using induced gravity on a brane in AdS/CFT. The bound follows from the assumption that bulk causality respects brane causality, and matches a bound recently conjectured by Freivogel and Krommydas for semiclassical gravity. We also prove a more general upper bound on the same quantity that follows simply from achronality. We check that the lower bound is satisfied in recent constructions of traversable wormholes, and demonstrate that the bound is related to causality in the ambient spacetime of the wormhole.

Keywords

AdS-CFT Correspondence Classical Theories of Gravity 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, J. Koeller, S. Leichenauer and A.C. Wall, Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 024017 [arXiv:1509.02542] [INSPIRE].
  2. [2]
    J. Koeller and S. Leichenauer, Holographic Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 024026 [arXiv:1512.06109] [INSPIRE].
  3. [3]
    T. Hartman, S. Kundu and A. Tajdini, Averaged Null Energy Condition from Causality, JHEP 07 (2017) 066 [arXiv:1610.05308] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    T. Faulkner, R.G. Leigh, O. Parrikar and H. Wang, Modular Hamiltonians for Deformed Half-Spaces and the Averaged Null Energy Condition, JHEP 09 (2016) 038 [arXiv:1605.08072] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    S. Balakrishnan, T. Faulkner, Z.U. Khandker and H. Wang, A General Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition, arXiv:1706.09432 [INSPIRE].
  6. [6]
    S. Leichenauer, A. Levine and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, Energy density from second shape variations of the von Neumann entropy, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 086013 [arXiv:1802.02584] [INSPIRE].
  7. [7]
    R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, S. Leichenauer and A.C. Wall, Quantum focusing conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 064044 [arXiv:1506.02669] [INSPIRE].
  8. [8]
    B. Freivogel and D. Krommydas, The Smeared Null Energy Condition, JHEP 12 (2018) 067 [arXiv:1807.03808] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    N. Graham and K.D. Olum, Achronal averaged null energy condition, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 064001 [arXiv:0705.3193] [INSPIRE].
  10. [10]
    L.H. Ford and T.A. Roman, Averaged energy conditions and quantum inequalities, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 4277 [gr-qc/9410043] [INSPIRE].
  11. [11]
    L.H. Ford and T.A. Roman, Restrictions on negative energy density in flat space-time, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 2082 [gr-qc/9607003] [INSPIRE].
  12. [12]
    L.H. Ford and T.A. Roman, The Quantum interest conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 104018 [gr-qc/9901074] [INSPIRE].
  13. [13]
    C.J. Fewster and T.A. Roman, Null energy conditions in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 044003 [Erratum ibid. D 80 (2009) 069903] [gr-qc/0209036] [INSPIRE].
  14. [14]
    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370 [hep-ph/9905221] [INSPIRE].
  15. [15]
    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, An Alternative to compactification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4690 [hep-th/9906064] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    H.L. Verlinde, Holography and compactification, Nucl. Phys. B 580 (2000) 264 [hep-th/9906182] [INSPIRE].
  17. [17]
    S.S. Gubser, AdS/CFT and gravity, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 084017 [hep-th/9912001] [INSPIRE].
  18. [18]
    R.C. Myers, R. Pourhasan and M. Smolkin, On Spacetime Entanglement, JHEP 06 (2013) 013 [arXiv:1304.2030] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    S. Gao and R.M. Wald, Theorems on gravitational time delay and related issues, Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 4999 [gr-qc/0007021] [INSPIRE].
  20. [20]
    W.R. Kelly and A.C. Wall, Holographic proof of the averaged null energy condition, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 106003 [Erratum ibid. D 91 (2015) 069902] [arXiv:1408.3566] [INSPIRE].
  21. [21]
    A.R. Levine, A Holographic Dual of the Quantum Inequalities, arXiv:1605.05751 [INSPIRE].
  22. [22]
    S. de Haro, S.N. Solodukhin and K. Skenderis, Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS/CFT correspondence, Commun. Math. Phys. 217 (2001) 595 [hep-th/0002230] [INSPIRE].
  23. [23]
    C. Imbimbo, A. Schwimmer, S. Theisen and S. Yankielowicz, Diffeomorphisms and holographic anomalies, Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 1129 [hep-th/9910267] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    A. Schwimmer and S. Theisen, Entanglement Entropy, Trace Anomalies and Holography, Nucl. Phys. B 801 (2008) 1 [arXiv:0802.1017] [INSPIRE].
  25. [25]
    P. Gao, D.L. Jafferis and A. Wall, Traversable Wormholes via a Double Trace Deformation, JHEP 12 (2017) 151 [arXiv:1608.05687] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    J. Maldacena, A. Milekhin and F. Popov, Traversable wormholes in four dimensions, arXiv:1807.04726 [INSPIRE].
  27. [27]
    C. Akers, J. Koeller, S. Leichenauer and A. Levine, Geometric Constraints from Subregion Duality Beyond the Classical Regime, arXiv:1610.08968 [INSPIRE].
  28. [28]
    N. Engelhardt and S. Fischetti, The Gravity Dual of Boundary Causality, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 175004 [arXiv:1604.03944] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    N. Afkhami-Jeddi, T. Hartman, S. Kundu and A. Tajdini, Shockwaves from the Operator Product Expansion, arXiv:1709.03597 [INSPIRE].

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics, Alphabet (Google) XMountain ViewU.S.A.
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyU.S.A.
  3. 3.Kavli Institute for Theoretical PhysicsUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations