Advertisement

Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2019:128 | Cite as

DEFT: a program for operators in EFT

  • Ben Gripaios
  • Dave SutherlandEmail author
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

We describe a Python-based computer program, DEFT, for manipulating operators in effective field theories (EFTs). In its current incarnation, DEFT can be applied to 4-dimensional, Poincaré invariant theories with gauge group SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1), such as the Standard Model (SM), but a variety of extensions (e.g. to lower dimensions or to an arbitrary product of unitary gauge groups) are possible. Amongst other features, the program is able to: (i) check whether an input list of Lagrangian operators (of a given dimension in the EFT expansion) is a basis for the space of operators contributing to S-matrix elements, once redundancies (such as Fierz-Pauli identities, integration by parts, and equations of motion) are taken into account; (ii) generate such a basis (where possible) from an input algorithm; (iii) carry out a change of basis. We describe applications to the SM (where we carry out a number of non-trivial cross-checks) and extensions thereof, and outline how the program may be of use in precision tests of the SM and in the ongoing search for new physics at the LHC and elsewhere. The code and instructions can be downloaded from http://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~dwsuth/DEFT/.

Keywords

Effective Field Theories Beyond Standard Model 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    M.B. Einhorn and J. Wudka, The bases of effective field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 876 (2013) 556 [arXiv:1307.0478] [INSPIRE].
  2. [2]
    B. Gripaios and D. Sutherland, An operator basis for the Standard Model with an added scalar singlet, JHEP 08 (2016) 103 [arXiv:1604.07365] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
  4. [4]
    B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. Falkowski, B. Fuks, K. Mawatari, K. Mimasu, F. Riva and V. Sanz, Rosetta: an operator basis translator for Standard Model effective field theory, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 583 [arXiv:1508.05895] [INSPIRE].
  6. [6]
    A. Falkowski, Higgs basis: proposal for an EFT basis choice for LHC HXSWG, LHCHXSWG-INT-2015-001, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2015).
  7. [7]
    L. Lehman and A. Martin, Hilbert series for constructing Lagrangians: expanding the phenomenologist’s toolbox, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 105014 [arXiv:1503.07537] [INSPIRE].
  8. [8]
    B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia and H. Murayama, Hilbert series and operator bases with derivatives in effective field theories, Commun. Math. Phys. 347 (2016) 363 [arXiv:1507.07240] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    L. Lehman and A. Martin, Low-derivative operators of the Standard Model effective field theory via Hilbert series methods, JHEP 02 (2016) 081 [arXiv:1510.00372] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia and H. Murayama, 2, 84, 30, 993, 560, 15456, 11962, 261485,. . . : higher dimension operators in the SM EFT, JHEP 08 (2017) 016 [arXiv:1512.03433] [INSPIRE].
  11. [11]
    B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia and H. Murayama, Operator bases, S-matrices and their partition functions, JHEP 10 (2017) 199 [arXiv:1706.08520] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    J.C. Criado, MatchingTools: a Python library for symbolic effective field theory calculations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 227 (2018) 42 [arXiv:1710.06445] [INSPIRE].
  13. [13]
    C. Arzt, Reduced effective Lagrangians, Phys. Lett. B 342 (1995) 189 [hep-ph/9304230] [INSPIRE].
  14. [14]
    A. Meurer et al., SymPy: symbolic computing in Python, PeerJ Comput. Sci. 3 (2017) e103.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    H.K. Dreiner, H.E. Haber and S.P. Martin, Two-component spinor techniques and Feynman rules for quantum field theory and supersymmetry, Phys. Rept. 494 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0812.1594] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    C. Cheung and C.-H. Shen, Nonrenormalization theorems without supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 071601 [arXiv:1505.01844] [INSPIRE].

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Cambridge, Cavendish LaboratoryCambridgeU.K.
  2. 2.University of California Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations