Scalar masses in general N=2 gauged supergravity theories
- 143 Downloads
Abstract
We readdress the question of whether any universal upper bound exists on the square mass m 2 of the lightest scalar around a supersymmetry breaking vacuum in generic N=2 gauged supergravity theories for a given gravitino mass m 3/2 and cosmological constant V. We review the known bounds which apply to theories with restricted matter content from a new perspective. We then extend these results to theories with both hyper and vector multiplets and a gauging involving only one generator, for which we show that such a bound exists for both V > 0 and V < 0. We finally argue that there is no bound for the same theories with a gauging involving two or more generators. These results imply that in N=2 supergravity theories metastable de Sitter vacua with V ≪ \( m_{{{3 \left/ {2} \right.}}}^2 \) can only arise if at least two isometries are gauged, while those with V ≫ \( m_{{{3 \left/ {2} \right.}}}^2 \) can also arise when a single isometry is gauged.
Keywords
Supersymmetry Breaking Extended Supersymmetry Supergravity Models dS vacua in string theoryNotes
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
References
- [1]M. Gomez-Reino, J. Louis and C.A. Scrucca, No metastable de Sitter vacua in N = 2 supergravity with only hypermultiplets, JHEP 02 (2009) 003 [arXiv:0812.0884] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [2]E. Cremmer et al., Vector multiplets coupled to N = 2 supergravity: super-Higgs effect, flat potentials and geometric structure, Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985) 385 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [3]P. Fré, M. Trigiante and A. Van Proeyen, Stable de Sitter vacua from N = 2 supergravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 4167 [hep-th/0205119] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [4]J.-C. Jacot and C.A. Scrucca, Metastable supersymmetry breaking in N = 2 non-linear σ-models, Nucl. Phys. B 840 (2010) 67 [arXiv:1005.2523] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [5]M. Gomez-Reino and C.A. Scrucca, Locally stable non-supersymmetric Minkowski vacua in supergravity, JHEP 05 (2006) 015 [hep-th/0602246] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [6]M. Gomez-Reino and C.A. Scrucca, Constraints for the existence of flat and stable non-supersymmetric vacua in supergravity, JHEP 09 (2006) 008 [hep-th/0606273] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [7]M. Gomez-Reino and C.A. Scrucca, Metastable supergravity vacua with F and D supersymmetry breaking, JHEP 08 (2007) 091 [arXiv:0706.2785] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [8]F. Denef and M.R. Douglas, Distributions of nonsupersymmetric flux vacua, JHEP 03 (2005) 061 [hep-th/0411183] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [9]L. Covi et al., De Sitter vacua in no-scale supergravities and Calabi-Yau string models, JHEP 06 (2008) 057 [arXiv:0804.1073] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [10]L. Covi et al., Constraints on modular inflation in supergravity and string theory, JHEP 08 (2008) 055 [arXiv:0805.3290] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [11]L. Brizi and C.A. Scrucca, The lightest scalar in theories with broken supersymmetry, JHEP 11 (2011) 013 [arXiv:1107.1596] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [12]F. Catino, C.A. Scrucca and P. Smyth, Metastable de Sitter vacua in N = 2 to N = 1 truncated supergravity, JHEP 10 (2012) 124 [arXiv:1209.0912] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [13]A. Borghese and D. Roest, Metastable supersymmetry breaking in extended supergravity, JHEP 05 (2011) 102 [arXiv:1012.3736] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [14]A. Borghese, R. Linares and D. Roest, Minimal stability in maximal supergravity, JHEP 07 (2012) 034 [arXiv:1112.3939] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [15]B. Legeret, C.A. Scrucca and P. Smyth, Metastable spontaneous breaking of N = 2 supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 722 (2013) 372 [arXiv:1211.7364] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [16]F. Catino, C.A. Scrucca and P. Smyth, Simple metastable de Sitter vacua in N = 2 gauged supergravity, JHEP 04 (2013) 056 [arXiv:1302.1754] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [17]L. Álvarez-Gaumé and D.Z. Freedman, Geometrical structure and ultraviolet finiteness in the supersymmetric σ-model, Commun. Math. Phys. 80 (1981) 443 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [18]L. Álvarez-Gaumé and D.Z. Freedman, Potentials for the supersymmetric nonlinear σ-model, Commun. Math. Phys. 91 (1983) 87 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [19]J. Bagger and E. Witten, Matter couplings in N = 2 supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 222 (1983) 1 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [20]B. de Wit and A. Van Proeyen, Potentials and symmetries of general gauged N = 2 supergravity: Yang-Mills models, Nucl. Phys. B 245 (1984) 89 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [21]B. de Wit, P. Lauwers and A. Van Proeyen, Lagrangians of N = 2 supergravity-matter systems, Nucl. Phys. B 255 (1985) 569 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [22]C. Hull, A. Karlhede, U. Lindström and M. Roček, Nonlinear σ models and their gauging in and out of superspace, Nucl. Phys. B 266 (1986) 1 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [23]A. Strominger, Special geometry, Commun. Math. Phys. 133 (1990) 163 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [24]R. D’Auria, S. Ferrara and P. Fré, Special and quaternionic isometries: general couplings in N =2 supergravity and the scalar potential, Nucl. Phys. B 359 (1991) 705 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [25]L. Andrianopoli et al., N = 2 supergravity and N = 2 super Yang-Mills theory on general scalar manifolds: symplectic covariance, gaugings and the momentum map, J. Geom. Phys. 23 (1997) 111 [hep-th/9605032] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [26]D.M. Calderbank and H. Pedersen, Selfdual Einstein metrics with torus symmetry, J. Diff. Geom. 60 (2002) 485 [math.DG/0105263] [INSPIRE].MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar