Thermodynamics of higher spin black holes in AdS3

Open Access


We discuss the thermodynamics of recently constructed three-dimensional higher spin black holes in SL(N,\( \mathbb{R} \)) × SL(N,\( \mathbb{R} \)) Chern-Simons theory with generalized asymptotically-anti-de Sitter boundary conditions. From a holographic perspective, these bulk theories are dual to two-dimensional CFTs with WN symmetry algebras, and the black hole solutions are dual to thermal states with higher spin chemical potentials and charges turned on. Because the notion of horizon area is not gauge-invariant in the higher spin theory, the traditional approaches to the computation of black hole entropy must be reconsidered. One possibility, explored in the recent literature, involves demanding the existence of a partition function in the CFT, and consistency with the first law of thermodynamics. This approach is not free from ambiguities, however, and in particular different definitions of energy result in different expressions for the entropy. In the present work we show that there are natural definitions of the thermodynamically conjugate variables that follow from careful examination of the variational principle, and moreover agree with those obtained via canonical methods. Building on this intuition, we derive general expressions for the higher spin black hole entropy and free energy which are written entirely in terms of the Chern-Simons connections, and are valid for both static and rotating solutions. We compare our results to other proposals in the literature, and provide a new and efficient way to determine the generalization of the Cardy formula to a situation with higher spin charges.


Gauge-gravity correspondence AdS-CFT Correspondence Black Holes 


  1. [1]
    J.M. Maldacena, The large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231 [Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113] [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE].ADSMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150] [INSPIRE].ADSMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    I. Klebanov and A. Polyakov, AdS dual of the critical O(N ) vector model, Phys. Lett. B 550 (2002) 213 [hep-th/0210114] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    E. Fradkin and M.A. Vasiliev, On the gravitational interaction of massless higher spin fields, Phys. Lett. B 189 (1987) 89 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    E. Fradkin and M.A. Vasiliev, Cubic interaction in extended theories of massless higher spin fields, Nucl. Phys. B 291 (1987) 141 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Blencowe, A consistent interacting massless higher spin field theory in D = (2 + 1), Class. Quant. Grav. 6 (1989) 443 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux, Central charges in the canonical realization of asymptotic symmetries: an example from three-dimensional gravity, Commun. Math. Phys. 104 (1986) 207 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Henneaux and S.-J. Rey, Nonlinear W as asymptotic symmetry of three-dimensional higher spin Anti-de Sitter gravity, JHEP 12 (2010) 007 [arXiv:1008.4579] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. Campoleoni, S. Fredenhagen, S. Pfenninger and S. Theisen, Asymptotic symmetries of three-dimensional gravity coupled to higher-spin fields, JHEP 11 (2010) 007 [arXiv:1008.4744] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    M.R. Gaberdiel, R. Gopakumar and A. Saha, Quantum W -symmetry in AdS 3, JHEP 02 (2011) 004 [arXiv:1009.6087] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Zamolodchikov, Infinite additional symmetries in two-dimensional conformal quantum field theory, Theor. Math. Phys. 65 (1985) 1205 [INSPIRE].CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. Bershadsky and H. Ooguri, Hidden SL(n) symmetry in conformal field theories, Commun. Math. Phys. 126 (1989) 49 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. de Boer, Six-dimensional supergravity on S 3 × AdS 3 and 2D conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 548 (1999) 139 [hep-th/9806104] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. Gutperle and P. Kraus, Higher spin black holes, JHEP 05 (2011) 022 [arXiv:1103.4304] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    M. Ammon, M. Gutperle, P. Kraus and E. Perlmutter, Spacetime geometry in higher spin gravity, JHEP 10 (2011) 053 [arXiv:1106.4788] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    A. Castro, E. Hijano, A. Lepage-Jutier and A. Maloney, Black holes and singularity resolution in higher spin gravity, JHEP 01 (2012) 031 [arXiv:1110.4117] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    M.R. Gaberdiel, T. Hartman and K. Jin, Higher spin black holes from CFT, JHEP 04 (2012) 103 [arXiv:1203.0015] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Ammon, M. Gutperle, P. Kraus and E. Perlmutter, Black holes in three dimensional higher spin gravity: a review, J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 214001 [arXiv:1208.5182] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    M. Bañados, R. Canto and S. Theisen, The action for higher spin black holes in three dimensions, JHEP 07 (2012) 147 [arXiv:1204.5105] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    A. Campoleoni, S. Fredenhagen, S. Pfenninger and S. Theisen, Towards metric-like higher-spin gauge theories in three dimensions, J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 214017 [arXiv:1208.1851] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    A. Perez, D. Tempo and R. Troncoso, Higher spin gravity in 3D: black holes, global charges and thermodynamics, Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013) 444 [arXiv:1207.2844] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    A. Perez, D. Tempo and R. Troncoso, Higher spin black hole entropy in three dimensions, JHEP 04 (2013) 143 [arXiv:1301.0847] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    A. Achúcarro and P. Townsend, A Chern-Simons action for three-dimensional Anti-de Sitter supergravity theories, Phys. Lett. B 180 (1986) 89 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    E. Witten, (2 + 1)-dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble system, Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1988) 46 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    E. Witten, Three-dimensional gravity revisited, arXiv:0706.3359 [INSPIRE].
  27. [27]
    O. Coussaert, M. Henneaux and P. van Driel, The asymptotic dynamics of three-dimensional Einstein gravity with a negative cosmological constant, Class. Quant. Grav. 12 (1995) 2961 [gr-qc/9506019] [INSPIRE].
  28. [28]
    M. Bañados, Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes, hep-th/9901148 [INSPIRE].
  29. [29]
    M. Bañados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, The black hole in three-dimensional space-time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 1849 [hep-th/9204099] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    P. Kraus, Lectures on black holes and the AdS 3 /CF T 2 correspondence, Lect. Notes Phys. 755 (2008) 193 [hep-th/0609074] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    J. de Boer and J. Goeree, W gravity from Chern-Simons theory, Nucl. Phys. B 381 (1992) 329 [hep-th/9112060] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    J. De Boer and J. Goeree, Covariant W gravity and its moduli space from gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B 401 (1993) 369 [hep-th/9206098] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    V. Drinfeld and V. Sokolov, Lie algebras and equations of Korteweg-de Vries type, J. Sov. Math. 30 (1984) 1975 [INSPIRE].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    A. Campoleoni, S. Fredenhagen and S. Pfenninger, Asymptotic W-symmetries in three-dimensional higher-spin gauge theories, JHEP 09 (2011) 113 [arXiv:1107.0290] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    F. Bais, T. Tjin and P. van Driel, Covariantly coupled chiral algebras, Nucl. Phys. B 357 (1991) 632 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    J. de Boer and T. Tjin, The relation between quantum W algebras and Lie algebras, Commun. Math. Phys. 160 (1994) 317 [hep-th/9302006] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    A. Castro, E. Hijano and A. Lepage-Jutier, Unitarity bounds in AdS 3 higher spin gravity, JHEP 06 (2012) 001 [arXiv:1202.4467] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    E. Dynkin, Semisimple subalgebras of semisimple Lie algebras, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 6 (1957) 111 [INSPIRE].MATHGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    J. de Boer and T. Tjin, Quantization and representation theory of finite W algebras, Commun. Math. Phys. 158 (1993) 485 [hep-th/9211109] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    A. Castro, R. Gopakumar, M. Gutperle and J. Raeymaekers, Conical defects in higher spin theories, JHEP 02 (2012) 096 [arXiv:1111.3381] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    J.R. David, M. Ferlaino and S.P. Kumar, Thermodynamics of higher spin black holes in 3D, JHEP 11 (2012) 135 [arXiv:1210.0284] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    J. de Boer and J.I. Jottar, Entanglement entropy and higher spin holography in AdS 3, to appear.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    P. Kraus and E. Perlmutter, Partition functions of higher spin black holes and their CFT duals, JHEP 11 (2011) 061 [arXiv:1108.2567] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Theoretical PhysicsUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations