Advertisement

The Poisson sigma model on closed surfaces

  • Francesco Bonechi
  • Alberto S. CattaneoEmail author
  • Pavel Mnev
Article

Abstract

Using methods of formal geometry, the Poisson sigma model on a closed surface is studied in perturbation theory. The effective action, as a function on vacua, is shown to have no quantum corrections if the surface is a torus or if the Poisson structure is regular and unimodular (e.g., symplectic). In the case of a Kähler structure or of a trivial Poisson structure, the partition function on the torus is shown to be the Euler characteristic of the target; some evidence is given for this to happen more generally. The methods of formal geometry introduced in this paper might be applicable to other sigma models, at least of the AKSZ type.

Keywords

Topological Field Theories Field Theories in Lower Dimensions Sigma Models 

References

  1. [1]
    M. Alexandrov, M. Kontsevich, A. Schwarz and O. Zaboronsky, The geometry of the master equation and topological quantum field theory, Int. J. Math. Phys. A 12 (1997) 1405 [hep-th/9502010] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    I.N. Bernshtein and B.I. Rozenfelöd, Homogeneous spaces of infinite-dimensional Lie algebras and the characteristic classes of foliations, Usp. Mat. Nauk. 28 (1973) 103.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. Berwick-Evans, The Chern-Gauss-Bonnet theorem via supersymmetric euclidean field theories.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. Berwick-Evans and T. Johnson-Freyd, Applications of BRST gauge fixing: Chern-Gauss-Bonnet and the volume of X//T X.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    F. Bonechi, P. Mnev and M. Zabzine, Finite dimensional AKSZ-BV theories, Lett. Math. Phys. 94 (2010) 197 [arXiv:0903.0995] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    F. Bonechi and M. Zabzine, Poisson σ-model on the sphere, Commun. Math. Phys. 285 (2009) 1033 [arXiv:0706.3164] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. Bott, Some aspects of invariant theory in differential geometry, in Differential operators on manifolds, E. Vesentini, Edizioni Cremonese, Roma Italy (1975).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    R. Bott and A.S. Cattaneo, Integral invariants of 3-manifolds, J. Diff. Geom. 48 (1998) 91.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    A.S. Cattaneo, Configuration space integrals and invariants for 3-manifolds and knots, Cont. Math. 233 (1999) 153 [math/9912083].MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A.S. Cattaneo and G. Felder, On the AKSZ formulation of the Poisson σ-model, Lett. Math. Phys. 56 (2001) 163 [math/0102108] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    A.S. Cattaneo and G. Felder, On the globalization of Kontsevichs star product and the perturbative Poisson σ-model, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 144 (2001) 38 [hep-th/0111028] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    A.S. Cattaneo and G. Felder, Effective Batalin-Vilkovisky theories, equivariant configuration spaces and cyclic chains, Progr. Math. 287 (2011) 111 [arXiv:0802.1706].MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    A.S. Cattaneo and P. Mnev, Remarks on Chern-Simons invariants, Commun. Math. Phys. 293 (2010) 803 [arXiv:0811.2045] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    K. Costello and O. Gwilliam, Factorization algebras in perturbative quantum field theory, http://math.northwestern.edu/∼costello/factorization.pdf.
  15. [15]
    I. Gelfand and D. Kazhdan, Some problems of differential geometry and the calculation of the cohomology of Lie algebras of vector fields, Sov. Math. Dokl. 12 (1971) 1367.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    N. Ikeda, Two-dimensional gravity and nonlinear gauge theory, Ann. Phys. 235 (1994) 435 [hep-th/9312059] [INSPIRE].ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    M. Kontsevich, Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds. 1, Lett. Math. Phys. 66 (2003) 157 [q-alg/9709040] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    P. Mnëv, Discrete BF theory, arXiv:0809.1160 [INSPIRE].
  19. [19]
    P. Schaller and T. Strobl, Poisson structure induced (topological) field theories, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 9 (1994) 3129 [hep-th/9405110] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    A. Weinstein, The modular automorphism group of a Poisson manifold, J. Geom. Phys. 23 (1997) 379.MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    E. Witten, Supersymmetry and Morse theory, J. Diff. Geom. 17 (1982) 661 [INSPIRE].MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    J. Frölich and C. King, The Chern-Simons theory and knot polynomials, Commun. Math. Phys. 126 (1989) 167 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SISSA, Trieste, Italy 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Bonechi
    • 1
  • Alberto S. Cattaneo
    • 2
    Email author
  • Pavel Mnev
    • 2
  1. 1.INFN.and Dipartimento di FisicaSesto FiorentinoItaly
  2. 2.Institut für MathematikUniversität ZürichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations