Journal of Rubber Research

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 30–45 | Cite as

Quantification of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Production of Young Buddings of Rubber in Malaysia

  • Zameri Mohamed
  • Sumiani YusoffEmail author


A study on quantification of greenhouse gas emissions was carried out with the objectives to quantify greenhouse gas emissions and identify the main greenhouse gas sources resulting from production of two whorl young buddings in polybags. The study was based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, fourth assessment report on global warming potential for a 100 year time horizon involving 32 rubber nurseries in Malaysia. The production and usage of N fertiliser as well as production of both high density polyethylene resin E and diesel are the four main processes which contribute to the release of greenhouse gas emissions resulting from the production of one two whorl young budding in a polybag. The greenhouse gas emissions from these four main processes and production of two whorl young buddings in polybags will potentially be reduced with a shortened growth period coupled with increase in bud-grafted success rate of individual grafters.


Young budding polybag rubber bud-grafted rubber nursery greenhouse gas emissions life cycle inventory 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    SHAM, S. (2009) The Politics of Climate Change: International Responses and Malaysia. Institut Alam Sekitar dan Pembangunan (LESTARI), Bangi, Selangor: LESTARI UKM.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    IPPC. (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change R. K Pachauri and L. A Meyer (eds). Geneva, Switzerland: IPPC, 151.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    SUZAINI ZAID And PETER GRAHAM. (2012) The Need for Energy Efficiency Legislation in the Malaysian Building Sector. RICS COBRA 2012, Conf. Proc., Las Vegas, 200–215.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    AL-AMIN, A., FILHO, W., MARIA de La TRINXERIA, J., HAMID JAAFAR, A. and ABDUL GHANI, Z. (2011) Assessing the Impacts of Climate Change in the Malaysian Agriculture Sector and its Influences in Investment Decision. Middle-East J. Sci. Res., 7(2), 225–234.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    AHMED, A., MASUD, M. M., AL-AMIN, A. Q., YAHAYA, S. R. B., RAHMAN, M., & AKHTAR, R. (2015) Exploring Factors Influencing Farmers’ Willingness to Pay (Wtp) for a Planned Adaptation Programme to Address Climatic Issues in Agricultural Sectors. Environ. Sci. and Pollution Res., 22(12), 9494–9504. doi: 10.1007/s11356–015–4110-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    UNDP. Third National Communications (TNC) to the UNFCCC and Biennial Update Reporting (BUR) for Malaysia. [Accessed on 29 July 2015], from—tnc—to-the-unfccc-and-biennial-u.htmlGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT MALAYSIA. (2010) National Policy on Climate Change.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT MALAYSIA. (2011) Second National Communication to the UNFCCC. Putrajaya, Malaysia.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    GARY, W. T.(2013) Roadmap to Achieving the 40% Carbon Intensity Emissions Reduction. Paper presented at the REDD+ Stakeholder Consultation Workshop, Sunway Putra Hotel, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    MALAYSIAN RUBBER BOARD (2009) Rubb. Plant. Proc. Technol. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Rubber Board.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    RAMLI, O. and SHARIFAH, N. S. N. (2012) Pemantauan Pengeluaran Bahan Tanaman Getah: Salah Satu Aktiviti di bawah Projek NKEA. Buletin Sains & Teknologi, 10(1), 39–42.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    WAN ZURAIDI, S., NOORLIANA, M. Z. and MALIK, Y. (2009) Establishement and Management of Rubber Nursery. Buletin Sains & Teknologi, 5(1), 11–14.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    MALAYSIAN RUBBER BOARD. (2014) One Nation Rubber Strategy. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Rubber Board.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ORGANIZATION. (2006) ISO 14040-Environmental Management- Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework, Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    IPPC (2006) 2006 IPPC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. In Eggleston H. S., L. Buendia, K. Miwa, T. Nagara & K. Tanabe (Eds.). Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    PESTICIDE BOARD MALAYSIA. (2015) List of Registered Pesticides Database. Department of Agriculture Malaysia [Accessed on 3rd November 2013], Scholar
  17. 17.
    HALIMAH, M., ZULKIFLI, H., VIJAYA, S., YEW, A.I., PUAH, C. W., CHONG, C. L. and CHOO, Y. M. (2010) Life Cycle Assessment of Oil Palm Seedling Production (Part 1). J. Oil Palm Res., 22, 878–886.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    SUMIANI, Y. (2006) Feasibility of Life Cycle Management for Improved Environmental Management-Case Study on Malaysian Palm Oil Industry. Phd Thesis, Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    HALIMAH, M., TAN, Y., NIK SASHA, K., ZURIATI, Z., RAWAIDA, A., and CHOO, Y. (2013) Determination of Life Cycle Inventory and Greenhouse Gas Emissions for a Selected Oil Palm Nursery in Malaysia: A Case Study. J. Oil Palm Res., 25(3), 343–347.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ORGANIZATION (2006) ISO 14044-Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment- Requirements and Guidelines, Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    MALAYSIAN RUBBER BOARD. Laporan PS-2. Available from Malaysian Rubber Board eSemaian [Accessed on 6 January 2014] Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zameri, M and Sumiani, Y. Unpublished Data.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Malaysian Rubber Board 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of MalayaLembah Pantai, Kuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Rubber Research Institute of MalaysiaMalaysian Rubber BoardKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations