Journal of Rubber Research

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 43–57 | Cite as

The Effect of Soil Series and Fertilizer Rates On the Growth of RRIM 3001

  • R. Muhammad ZahidinEmail author
  • W. D. Wan Noordin
  • S. Zulkefly


Rubber hectarage has decreased year by year. Thus, future planting has been pushed to the problem areas which are class TV and V soils. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the growth and physiological traits of RRIM 3001 planted in non-traditional area which is Gajah Mati and Jabil series and to measure the optimum rate of fertilizer of RRIM 3001 planted in these soils. In this study, the fertilizer rates were divided into four levels, T1 (0 g/tree per year), T2 (480 g/tree per year), T3 (720 g/tree per year) and T4 (960 g/tree per year). The fertilizer used in this study is NPK Yellow (15:15:6:4). In terms of the total plant height and girth increment, there were significant difference between Gajah Mati and Jabil series where Gajah Mati showed better performance compared to Jabil series. This is attributed to the drainage status of the soil which is well drained whereas Jabil is poorly drained. Applying fertilizer up to the rate of 658 g/tree per year responded to quadratic model with the maximum of 10.3 cm/year on Gajah Mati compared to Jabil, 715 g/tree per year which gave the maximum girth of 8.4 cm/year. From this study, it is recommended that for non-traditional area especially Jabil and Gajah Mati, fertilizer should be applied 37% extra compared to the recommended rates in Gajah Mati series, while for the Jabil series, fertilizer should be applied 49% extra compared to the recommended rates in order to obtain maximum girth (cm/year). On the other hand, the fertilizer use should contain higher K compared to the NPK Yellow (15:15:6:4).


RRIM 3001 Gajah Mati Jabil growth 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    SUARNI, S. (2012) National Key Economic Area (NKEA): Shaping the Malaysian Rubber Industry for 2020. MRB Rubb. Technol. Dev., 12(2), 3–8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    YEW, F.K. (1992) Soil Suitability for Rubber Cultivation. Plrs.’ Bull., 211, 63–76.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    PUSHPARAJAH, E. (1981) Problems and Potentials for Establishing Hevea under Difficult Environmental Conditions. IRRDB Symposium.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    CHAN, H.Y., SOONG, N.K., WONG, C.B., CHANG, A.K. (1973) Management of Soils under Hevea in West Malaysia. In: Proceedings of RRIM Planters’ Conference. Kuala Lumpur: RRIM.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    CHAN, H.Y, AND PUSHPARAJAH, E. (1972) Productivity Potentials of Mature Hevea on West Malaysian Soils. In: Proceedings Rubber Research Institute Malaya Planters’ Conference Kuala Lumpur. Kuala Lumpur: RRIM.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    CHAN, H.Y, WONG, C.B., SIVANADYAN, K. AND PUSHPARAJAH, E. (1974) Influence of Soil Morphology and Physiography on Leaf Nutrient Content and Performance of Hevea. In: Proceedings of RRIM planters’ Conference. Kuala Lumpur: RRIM.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    SIVANADYAN, K. (1972) Lysimeter Studies on the Efficiency of Some Potassium and Nitrogenous Fertilizers on Two Common Soils in West Malaysia. In: Proceedings 2nd ASEAN Soil Conference Djakarta.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    PARAMANANTHAN, S. (2000) Soils of Malaysia: Their Characteristics and Identification. Academy of Science Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: ASM. 1.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    PUSHPARAJAH, E. AND YEW, F.K. (1977) Management of Soils. In: Soils under Hevea in Peninsular Malaysia and Their Management. Kuala Lumpur: RRIM.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    MALAYSIAN RUBBER BOARD (2009) Soils and Land Preparation. In: Rubber Plantation and Processing Technologies. Kuala Lumpur: MRB. 69–89.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ANON. (1960) Soil Reaction and Cultivation. Plrs.’ Bull, 50, 98–103.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    WAN NOORDIN, W.D. (2013) Rubber Plantation: Soil Management and Nutritional Requirement. Serdang: UPM.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    RUBBER RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MALAYSIA (1990) Manual for Diagnosing Nutritional Requirements for Hevea. Kuala Lumpur: RRIM.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    PUSHPARAJAH, E. AND GUHA, M.M. (1968) Fertilizer Response in Hevea brasiliensis in Relation to Soil Type and Soil and Leaf Nutrient Status. In: Trans, 9th International Congress of Soil Science Adelaide. Sydney: International Society of Soil Science. 4, 85.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    GUHA, M.M. AND YEOW, K.H. (1966) Content of Major Nutrients in Rubber Growing Soils of Malaya. In: Proceedings 2nd Malaysian Soils Conference Kuala Lumpur. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Agricultural & Cooperative. 171.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    SOONG, N.K. AND LAU, C.H. (1977) Physical and Chemical Properties of Soil. In: Soils under Hevea in Peninsular Malaysia and their Management. Kuala Lumpur: RRIM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Malaysian Rubber Board 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Muhammad Zahidin
    • 1
    Email author
  • W. D. Wan Noordin
    • 2
  • S. Zulkefly
    • 2
  1. 1.Rubber Research Institute of MalaysiaMalaysian Rubber BoardSungai BulohMalaysia
  2. 2.Crop Science, Faculty of AgricultureUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations