Advertisement

Organizational Impact of Blockchain through Decentralized Autonomous Organizations

  • Soichiro TakagiEmail author
Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

There is a growing attention to “Blockchain” as a key technological innovation likely to change a wide spectrum of the economy and organizations. Blockchain, also referred to as “Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT)”, was initially created as a platform technology to enable Bitcoin. Bitcoin and similar digital currencies are issued and maintained by anonymous participants (peers) around the world. Although blockchain was developed to enable Bitcoin, there is a perception that it can be used not only for currencies but also for a wide range of assets, from digital content to real property. In addition, the development of the technology has enabled blockchain to work as a computing platform which conveys software codes in a decentralized network, eventually working as a “networked” or “decentralized” computer. The current prior studies are concentrated on the impact and challenges of Bitcoin or similar digital currencies, but the studies on the impact of the fundamental blockchain technology are limited. On the other hand, blockchain has a possibility to affect wide aspects of the economy, such as intermediary services, digital currency, organizational structures, data management, microtransactions, and newly created industry. Among them, this paper focuses on how blockchain may affect organizational structures and quantitatively analyses which occupations are most suitable for Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO). The quantitative analysis with O*NET data reveals that three main clusters of occupations are the most suitable for DAO: “IT experts”, “Brokerage tasks”, and “Information handling occupations”.

Key words

Blockchain Bitcoin Decentralized Autonomous Organizations 

Category & Number stated in the Call for Papers

JEL Classification Code

O33 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This study is presented at The 15th International Conference of the Japan Economic Policy Association. The author thanks to the participants and discussant at the conference, and also anonymous referees for helpful comments. This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI, Grant Number 15K00460. All errors remain the author’s.

References

  1. Ang, S. and D.W. Straub. (1998). Production and Transaction Economies and IS Outsourcing: A Study of the U.S. Banking Industry. MIS Quarterly 22, no.4: 535–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonopoulos, A. M. (2014) Mastering Bitcoin: Unlocking Digital Cryptocurrencies, O’Reilly.Google Scholar
  3. Bahli, B. and S. Rivard. (2003). The Information Technology Outsourcing Risk: A Transaction Cost and Agency Theory-Based Perspective. Journal of Information Technology. 18, no.3: 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blair, M.M., O’Connor, E.O. and Kirchhoefer. G. (2011). Outsourcing, Modularity, and the Theory of the Firm. Brigham Young University Law Review 2011, no.2: 263–314.Google Scholar
  5. Byrne, P.J. (2016). #THEDAO: Broken, but worth fixing (Blog entry), https://prestonbyrne.com/2016/05/17/thedao-dont-walk-away-restructure/Google Scholar
  6. Cheah, E. and Fry, J. (2015). Speculative bubbles in Bitcoin markets? An empirical investigation into the fundamental value of Bitcoin. Economics Letters. Vol.130, pp.32–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica. Vol.4, No. 16. pp.386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dibbern, J, Winkler, J. and Heinzl, A. (2008). Explaining Variations in Client Extra Costs between Software Projects Offshoredto India. MIS Quarterly 32, no.2: 333–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frey, C.B. and Osborne, M.A. (2013) THE FUTURE OF EMPLOYMENT: HOW SUSCEPTIBLE ARE JOBS TO COMPUTERISATION? http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdfGoogle Scholar
  10. Gandal, N. and Halaburda, H. (2016). Can We Predict the Winner in a Market with Network Effects? Competition in Cryptocurrency Market. Games. Vol.7, No.3. pp.16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hayes, A.S. (2016). Cryptocurrency value formation: An empirical study leading to a cost of production model for valuing bitcoin. Telematics and Informatics.Google Scholar
  12. Higgins, S. (2016). Public Opinion Split As The DAO Rakes in Ethereum Funding, Coindesk. http://www.coindesk.com/amid-huge-fundraise-thedao-sparks-a-public-debate/Google Scholar
  13. Iavorschi, M. (2013). THE BITCOIN PROJECT AND THE FREE MARKET. CES Working Papers. Vol.5, No.4. pp.529–534.Google Scholar
  14. Kowalski, P. (2015). Taxing Bitcoin Transactions Under Polish Tax Law / Opodatkowanie Obrotu Bitcoinami Na Gruncie Przepisów Polskiego Prawa Podatkowego. Comparative Economic Research. Vol.18, No.3. pp.139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Makadok, R., and Coff, R. (2009). Both Market and Hierarchy: An Incentive-System Theory of Hybrid Governance Forms. The Academy of Management Review, Vol.34, No.2, pp.297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ménard, C. (2004). The Economics of Hybrid Organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160, pp.345–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. METI. (2016). Survey on blockchain technologies and related services http://www.meti.gojp/english/press/2016/pdf/0531_01f.pdf.Google Scholar
  18. Milgrom, P.R. and Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, Organization and Management. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Michael, B. and Michael, R. (2011). A Transaction Cost Economics View of Outsourcing. International Journal of Business, Humanities & Technology 1, no.2: 34–43.Google Scholar
  20. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.Google Scholar
  21. Ono, Y. and Stango, V. (2005). Outsourcing, Firm Size, and Product Complexity: Evidence from Credit Unions. Economic Perspectives 29, no. 1: 2–11.Google Scholar
  22. Osada, H. (2015). Ageless shugyo no jidai wo hiraku (in Japanese) NIRA Opinion Paper. Vol.18, http://www.nira.or.jp/pdf/opinion18.pdf
  23. Raval, S. (2016). Decentralized Applications: Harnessing Bitcoin’s Blockchain Technology, O’Reilly.Google Scholar
  24. Siegel, D. (2016) Understanding The DAO Attack, CoinDesk. http://www.coindesk.com/understanding-dao-hack-journalists/Google Scholar
  25. Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy, O’Reilly.Google Scholar
  26. Takagi, S. (2016). Tettei rikai Blockchain” (in Japanese). Weekly Economist, July 5th, 2016. pp.33–35.Google Scholar
  27. Takagi, S. and Tanaka, H. (2014). INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF MODERN BUSINESS OUTSOURCING. The Internationaljournal of Economic Policy Studies. Vol.9, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  28. Tapscott, D. and Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world,.Google Scholar
  29. UK Government. (2015). Distributed Ledger Technology: beyond block chain, A report by the UK Government Chief Scientific Adviser.Google Scholar
  30. Willcocks, L.P. and Lacity, M.C. (1995). “Information Systems Outsourcing in Theory and Practice.” Editorial, Journal of Information Technology 10: 203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies, Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  32. Williamson, O.E. (1991). Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.36, No.2 (Jun., 1991), pp.269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Economic Policy Association (JEPA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Global CommunicationsInternational University of JapanTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations