Advertisement

The Role Of Transactions Costs In Economic Growth

  • David Bywaters
  • Pawel Mlodkowski
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

This paper deals with the role of reductions in transactions costs as a cause of economic growth. The core of the paper consists of three analyses of this issue. First, an intuitive analysis based on the “make versus buy” decision, relating the scope of trading to production cost differences and transactions costs. Secondly, the paper presents a quite general theoretical analysis of consumption and production activities, and of exchange activities with transactions costs, in the context of mathematical programming, to show how reductions in transactions costs affect the economic welfare and growth of an overall economy. Lastly, linear programming and duality is used to relate the earlier results more closely to GDP and economic growth.

Optimising consumption, for an agent, involves a Lagrangean function, and Lagrange multipliers for commodities, which can be interpreted as prices. An important aspect of the approach here is that each agent has their own prices, so the analysis is rather different to that of conventional demand theory. Agent-specific prices follow from significant transactions costs. The power of conventional demand theory is obtained by ignoring transactions costs, enabling prices to be equalised across agents. Consumption here is optimized where the constraint for each commodity is that goods and services can only come from stock, production, or exchange. Each agent can own and operate production processes, which are assumed to be linear. To operate a production process, an agent must “own” the required input commodities. This assumption is necessary to keep track of the associated transactions costs. Each agent can acquire some of one commodity from another agent, in exchange for giving up some of another commodity of its own, while incurring some transactions costs. The agent’s Lagrangean function is then differentiated in order to assess the effects of a reduction in transaction costs, using comparative statics. The paper ends by applying the earlier analysis to some episodes of the economic history of growth and development, and also to government policies for reducing transactions costs.

Key words

transactions costs economic growth and development comparative statics 

JEL Classification

C4 C6 E1 D9 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Badinger, H. 2005. Growth Effects of Economic Integration: Evidence from the EU Member States. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 141 (1): 50–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badinger, H. 2008. Technology and Investment-led Growth Effects of Economic Integration: A Panel Cointegration Analysis for the EU 15 1960 to 2000. Applied Economics Letters 15 (7): 557–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, R and Wyplosz, C. 2009. The Economics of European Integration. 3rd edition McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Borland, J and Yang, X. 1995. Specialization, Product Development, Evolution of the Institution of the Firm, and Economic Growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 5: 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Debreu, G. 1959. Theory of Value. Cowles Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Hicks, J. R. 1968 Linear Theory in Surveys of Economic Theory: Volume 3 Resource Allocation. American Economic Association, Royal Economic Society, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Matthews, R. C. O. 1986. The Economics of Institutions and the Sources of Growth. Economic Journal 96: 903–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Morishima, M. 1973. Kindai Shakai no Keizai Riron. Sobunsha, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  9. Moroshima, M. 1976. The Economic Theory of Modern Society. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  10. North, D. C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. W W Norton.Google Scholar
  11. North, D.C. and Anderson, T. L. 1982. Growth and Welfare in the American Past. 3rd edition Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  12. Reynolds, Lloyd G. 1983. The Spread of Economic Growth to the Third World: 1850–1980. Journal of Economic Literature XXI: 941–980.Google Scholar
  13. Romer, P. M. 1990. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98 (5): 71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Seidel, F. 1971. Das Armutsproblem im deutschen Vormarz bei Friederich List. [in]: Kölner Vorträge zur Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte - volume 13, Köln 1971.Google Scholar
  15. Smith, A. 1776. The Wealth of Nations. Random House Modern Library 1937.Google Scholar
  16. Solow, R. 1956. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Solow, R. 1957. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics 39: 312–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. UNIDO/UNCTAD. 2011. Economic Development in Africa: Fostering Industrial Development in Africa in the New Global Environment.Google Scholar
  19. Williamson, O. E. 2000. The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature 38 (3): 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yang, X. and Borland, J. 1991. A Microeconomic Mechanism for Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy 99(3): 460–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Economic Policy Association (JEPA) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UK
  2. 2.Department of Management and Social SciencesInternational IT UniversityAlmatyKazakhstan

Personalised recommendations