Advertisement

Market Reaction to Announcements of Share-Based Payment

  • Grace M. Liao
  • Chilin Lu
  • Y. W. Chen
Article

Abstract

Taiwan’s Financial Accounting Standard does not align regulations with International Accounting Standards (IAS) in treatment of stock bonus paid to employees before 2008. IAS treats stock compensation as expense but Taiwan-listed companies recognized share-based compensation awards as allocation of retained earnings before 2008. To align with IAS, Taiwan’s SFAS No. 39 provides an accounting standard for employee stock bonuses by recognizing expenses to reflect the real value of the income statement and firm’s earnings. SFAS no. 39 will affect accounting earnings, and supposedly, the stock prices for listed firms in Taiwan. This paper examines market reactions to the announcement of SFAS no. 39. Our empirical results show that stock prices reacted significantly and negatively to announcement of SFAS No. 39 during the announcement period.

Key words

Share-based Payment Taiwan’s SFAS no.39 Abnormal Returns 

JEL Classification

G28 M48 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aboody, D., M.E. Barth, and, R. Kasznik. 2004. “SFAS 123 Stock-Based Compensation Expense and Equity Market Values”, The Accounting Review, 42, 123–150.Google Scholar
  2. Binder, J.J. 1985. “Measuring the Effects of Regulation with Stock Price Data”, Rand Journal of Economics, 16(2), 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Huges, J.S., and C.B. Levine. 2003. “Management Compensation and Earnings-Based Covenants in Resolving Adverse Selection in Credit Markets”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  4. Cox, D.R. and D.R. Peterson. 1994. “Stock Returns Following Large One Day Declines: Evidence on Short-term Reveals and Long-term Performance”, Journal of Finance, 49(1), 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Bond, F.Werner and R.H. Thaler. 1985. “Does the Stock Market Overreact?”, Journal of Finance, 40(3), 793–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hirst, D.E., K.E. Jackson, and L. Koonce. 2003. “Improving Financial Reports by Revealing the Prior Accuracy of Estimates”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(Spring): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huson, H., T. Scott and H. Wier. 2001. “Earnings Dilution and the Explanatory Power of Earnings for Return”, The Accounting Review, 76 (October): 589–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Li, H. 2002. “Stock Option Compensation and Equity Valuation”, Unpublished dissertation, The University of Taxas at Austin.Google Scholar
  9. Sheu, H. and C. Yang. 2005. “Insider Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: A Productivity Perspective Study in Taiwan’s Electronics Industry”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13, 326–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. White, H. 1980. “A Heteroscedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity”, Econometrica, 48, 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Economic Policy Association (JEPA) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grace M. Liao
    • 1
  • Chilin Lu
    • 2
  • Y. W. Chen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Industrial Engineering and ManagementChung Jung Christian UniversityTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Business AdministrationNational Formosa UniversityTaiwan
  3. 3.USA

Personalised recommendations