Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 100, Issue 1, pp 60–64 | Cite as

The Effect of Social Support and School- and Community-based Sports on Youth Physical Activity

  • Andrew R. Kurc
  • Scott T. Leatherdale
Quantitative Research

Abstract

Objective

To examine how social support, participation in intramurals, varsity and community sports are associated with physical activity among Ontario secondary school students, and explore gender differences in the prevalence of physical activity and participation in school- and community-based sports.

Methods

Data from 25,416 students (grades 9-12) attending 76 Ontario secondary schools were collected using the School Health Action, Planning, and Evaluation System (SHAPES). Logistic regression analyses examined how social support and school- and community-based sports participation were associated with physical activity.

Results

Males and females with low social support for physical activity were less likely to be active than their lower-risk peers (males: OR 0.61; females: OR 0.72). Males and females were more likely to be active if they participated in intramural activities (males: OR 1.92; females: OR 1.55), varsity sports (males: OR 1.93; females: OR 1.77), or community sports (males: OR 2.84; females: OR 2.90).

Conclusion

Since students with low social support for physical activity were less likely to be active, interventions to increase support and engagement in physical activity should be targeted to these students. In addition, considering that participation in school- and community-based sports increases the likelihood that students were active, practitioners should seek to enhance opportunities for participation in and access to these programs in order to increase the level of activity obtained by students.

Key words

Social support physical activity sedentary behaviour youth school sports schools gender 

Résumé

Objectif

Examiner en quoi le soutien social et la participation aux sports intra-muros, universitaires et communautaires sont associés à l’activité physique chez les élèves du secondaire de l’Ontario et étudier les sexospécificités dans la prévalence de l’activité physique et la participation aux activités sportives en milieu scolaire et communautaire.

Méthode

Nous avons recueilli des données sur 25 416 élèves (9e à 12e année) fréquentant 76 écoles secondaires de l’Ontario à l’aide du Système d’intervention, de planification et d’évaluation de la santé dans les écoles (SIPÉSÉ). Au moyen d’analyses de régression logistique, nous avons examiné l’association entre le soutien social et la participation sportive en milieu scolaire et communautaire, d’une part, et l’activité physique d’autre part.

Résultats

Les garçons et les filles peu encouragés à faire de l’activité physique dans leur milieu social étaient moins susceptibles d’être actifs que leurs pairs moins à risque (garçons: rapport de cotes [RC] = 0,61; filles: RC = 0,72). Garçons et filles étaient plus susceptibles d’être actifs s’ils participaient à des sports intra-muros (garçons: RC = 1,92; filles: RC = 1,55), universitaires (garçons: RC = 1,93; filles: RC = 1,77) ou communautaires (garçons: RC = 2,84; filles: RC = 2,90).

Conclusion

Étant donné que les élèves recevant peu de soutien social à l’activité physique sont moins susceptibles d’être actifs, les interventions visant à accroître le soutien et le goût pour l’activité physique devraient cibler ces élèves. De plus, comme la participation aux sports scolaires et communautaires augmente la probabilité que les élèves soient actifs, les praticiens devraient chercher à améliorer les occasions de participation et l’accès à de tels programmes afin d’accroître le niveau d’activité des élèves.

Mots clés

soutien social activité physique comportement sédentaire jeunes sport scolaire; écoles sexospécificités 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sallis JF, Haskell WL, Wood PD, Fortmann SP, Vranizan KM. Vigorous physical activity and cardiovascular risk factors in young adults. J Chron Dis 1986;39(2):115–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boreham CA, Twisk J, Savange MJ, Cran GW, Strain JJ. Physical activity, sports participation, and risk factors in adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997;29(6):788–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jebb SA, Moore MS. Contribution of a sedentary lifestyle and inactivity to the etiology of overweight and obesity: Current evidence and research issues. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999;31(11):S534–S541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, Taylor WC. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32(5):963–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. The President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shields M. Overweight and obesity among children and youth. Health Rep 2006;17:27–42.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ogden CL, Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 1999–2000. JAMA 2002;288:1728–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Participation in high school physical education—United States, 1991–2003. MMWR 2004;53(36):844–47.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Craig CL, Cameron C, Russell SJ, Beaulieu A. Increasing physical activity: Supporting children’s participation. Ottawa: Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute, 2001.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dwyer JJ, Allison KR, LeMoine KN, Adlaf EM, Goodman J, Faulkner GE, Lysy DC. A provincial study of opportunities for school-based physical activity in secondary schools. J Adolesc Health 2006;39(1):80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faulkner GE, Goodman J, Adlaf E, Irving H, Allison KA, Dwyer JJ. Participation in high school physical education — Ontario, Canada, 1999–2005. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2007;56(3):52–54.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beets MW, Vogel R, Forlaw L, Pitetti KH, Cardinal BJ. Social support and youth physical activity: The role of provider and type. Am J Health Behav 2006;30(3):278–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anderssen N, Wold B. Parental and peer influences on leisure-time physical activity in young adolescents. Res Q Exerc Sport 1992;63(4):341–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prochaska JJ, Rodgers MW, Sallis JF. Association of parent and peer support with adolescent physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 2002;73(2):206–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raudsepp L. The relationship between socio-economic status, parental support and adolescent physical activity. Acta Paediatr 2006;95(1):93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leatherdale ST, Cameron R, Brown KS, Jolin MA, Kroaeker C. The influence of friends, family, and older peers on smoking among elementary school students: Low-risk students in high-risk schools. Prev Med 2006;42(3):218–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cameron R, Manske S, Brown KS, Jolin MA, Murnaghan D, Lovato C. Integrating public health policy, practice, evaluation, surveillance, and research: The School Health Action Planning and Evaluation System. Am J Public Health 2007;97(4):648–54. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wong S, Leatherdale ST, Manske S. Reliability and validity of a school-based physical activity questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006;38(9):1593–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McMurray RG, Ring KB, Treuth MS, Welk GJ, Pate RR, Schmitz KH, et al. Comparison of two approaches to structured physical activity surveys for adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36(12):2135–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. BMI — Body Mass Index: About BMI for children and teens. 2006. Available online at: https://doi.org/www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/BMI/childrens_bmi/about_childrens_bmi (Accessed June 13, 2006).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leatherdale ST, Brown KS, Cameron R, McDonald PW. Social modeling in the school environment, student characteristics, and smoking susceptibility: A multi-level analysis. J Adolesc Health 2005;37(4):330–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    SAS Version 9.1 by SAS Institute Inc., 2002-2003; Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cameron R, Brown KS, Best JA, Pelkman CL, Madill CL, Manske SR, et al. Effectiveness of a social influences smoking prevention program as a function of provider type, training method, and school risk. Am J Public Health 1999;89:1827–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Biddle S, Gorely T, Marshall SJ, Murdey I, Cameron N. Physical activity and sedentary behaviours in youth: Issues and controversies. J R Soc Health 2003;124:29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koezuka N, Koo M, Allison KR, Adlaf EM, Dwyer JJ, Faulkner GE, Goodman J. The relationship between sedentary activities and physical inactivity among adolescents: Results from the Canadian Community Health Survey. J Adolesc Health 2006;39(4):515–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leatherdale ST, Wong SL. Modifiable characteristics associated with sedentary behaviours among youth. Int J Pediatr Obes 2008;3:93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Trost SG, Sallis JF, Pate RR, Freedson PS, Taylor WC, Dowda M. Evaluating a model of parental influence on youth physical activity. Am J Prev Med 2003;25:277–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Adams J. Trends in physical activity and inactivity amongst US 14–18 year olds by gender, school grade and race, 1993–2003: Evidence from the youth risk behavior survey. BMC Public Health 2006;6:57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Powers HS, Conway TL, McKenzie TL, Sallis JF, Marshall SJ. Participation in extracurricular physical activity programs at middle schools. Res Q Exerc Sport 2002;73(2):187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Health SciencesUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Division of Preventive Oncology, Cancer Care OntarioTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of Health Studies and GerontologyUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations