Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 97, Issue 2, pp 96–99 | Cite as

Assessing Road Rage Victimization and Perpetration in the Ontario Adult Population

The Impact of Illicit Drug Use and Psychiatric Distress
  • Jennifer E. ButtersEmail author
  • Robert E. Mann
  • Reginald G. Smart
Research

Abstract

Background

To investigate the association among illicit drug use, psychiatric distress and road rage victimization and offending. Particular attention is given to the most serious forms of road rage behaviour.

Methods

The data are based on the 2002 CAMH Monitor and include a sample of 2,421 Ontario adults aged 18 and older. Logistic regression analyses were conducted with illicit drug use and psychiatric distress (GHQ) and demographic factors as independent variables.

Results

Past-year road rage victimization was reported by 42% of the sample and 31% reported any type of road rage offending. Approximately 5% were classified as respondents with serious road rage involvement. The logistic regression analyses revealed significant relationships between illicit drug use and road rage outcomes. Cannabis use was significantly associated with general road rage victimization and offending, while stimulant use substantially increased the likelihood of victimization and membership in the serious road rage classification. Psychiatric distress significantly increased the odds of both road rage victimization and serious road rage involvement.

Conclusion

These data reveal different indicators of road rage offending, victimization and serious involvement. Further work is needed to clarify the mechanisms associated with the relationship among stimulant use, psychiatric distress and serious road rage involvement.

MeSH terms

Automobile driving marijuana and stimulant use stress psychological 

Résumé

Contexte

Pour étudier l’association entre l’utilisation illicite de drogue, la détresse psychiatrique et victimisation et offenser de fureur de route. Une attention particulière est donnée aux formes les plus sérieuses de comportement de fureur de route.

Méthodes

Les données sont basées sur le moniteur de 2002 CAMH et incluent un groupe de 2 421 adultes d’Ontario âgés de 18 ans et plus. Des analyses logistiques de régression ont été conduites avec l’utilisation illicite de drogue et la détresse psychiatrique (GHQ) et les facteurs démographiques en tant que variables indépendantes.

Résultats

Après la fureur de route d’année la victimisation a été rapportée de 42 % de l’échantillon et 31 % a rapporté n’importe quel type d’offenser de fureur de route. Approximativement 5 % ont été classifiés comme répondants avec la participation sérieuse de fureur de route. Les analyses logistiques de régression ont indiqué des rapports significatifs entre l’utilisation de drogue et les résultats illicites de fureur de route. L’utilisation de cannabis a été sensiblement associée à la victimisation générale de fureur de route et à offenser, alors que l’utilisation de stimulant augmentait sensiblement la probabilité de la victimisation et de l’adhésion dans la classification sérieuse de fureur de route. La détresse psychiatrique a augmenté de manière significative la chance de la victimisation de fureur de route et de la participation sérieuse de fureur de route.

Conclusion

Ces données indiquent différents indicateurs d’offenser de fureur de route, de victimisation et de participation sérieuse. Davantage de travail est nécessaire pour clarifier les mécanismes liés au rapport entre l’utilisation de stimulant, la détresse psychiatrique et la participation sérieuse de fureur de route.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cohen M, Ansara D. Sexual assault and intimate partner violence. In: Stewart D, Cheung A, Ferris L, Hyman I, Cohen M, Williams J (Eds.), Ontario Women’s Health Status Report. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, 2002;96–112.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gartner R. Homicide in Canada. In: Ross J (Ed.), Violence in Canada: Sociopolitical Perspectives. Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press, 1995;186–222.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pernanen K. Alcohol and crimes of violence. In: Kissin B, Begleiter H (Eds.), The Biology of Alcoholism: Vol. 4 Social Aspects of Alcoholism. New York, NY: Plenum Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pernanen K. Theoretical aspects of the relationship between alcohol use and crime. In: Collins J, Drinking and Crime. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pernanen K. Alcohol in Human Violence. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pernanen K, Cousinear MM, Brochu S, Sun F. Proportions of crimes associated with alcohol and other drugs in Canada. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, 2002.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smart R, Mann R, Tyson L. Drug and violence among Ontario students. J Psychol Drugs 1997;29(4):369–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    James L, Nahl H. Road Rage and Aggressive Driving. Amherest, NY: Prometheus Books, 2002.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smart R, Mann R. Is road rage a serious traffic problem? J Traffic Medicine 2002a;3:183–89.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smart R, Mann R. Deaths and injuries from road rage: Cases in Canadian newspapers. CMAJ 2002b;167:761–62.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Asbridge M, Smart R, Mann R. The homogamy of ‘road rage’: Examining the relationship between victimization and offending among violent and aggressive motorists. Violence and Victims 2003;18(5):517–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Butters J, Smart R, Mann R, Asbridge M. Illicit drug use, alcohol use and problem drinking among infrequent and frequent road ragers. Drugs and Alcohol Dependence In press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Joint M. Road Rage. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, 1995.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smart R, Asbridge M, Mann R, Adlaf E. Psychiatric distress among road rage victims and perpetrators. Can J Psychiatry 2003;48:323–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mann R, Smart R, Stoduto G, Adlaf E, Ialomiteanu A. Alcohol consumption and problems among road rage victims and perpetrators. J Studies Alcohol 2004;65:161–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fong G, Frost D, Stansfeld S. Road rage: A psychiatric phenomenon? Soc Psychiatr Epidemiol 2002;36:277–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Adlaf E, Ialomiteanu A. CAMH Monitor 2001: Technical Guide. Toronto, ON: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 2002.[Available in PDF format].Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goldberg D. The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. London, UK: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goldberg D. Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER Publishing Company, 1978.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Banks M. Validation of the General Health Questionnaire in a young community sample. Psychol Med 1983;13:349–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D’Arcy C, Siddique C. Psychological distress among Canadian adolescents. Psychol Med 1984;14:615–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Donath S. The validity of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire in Australia: A comparision between three scoring methods. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2001;35:231–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goldberg D, Hiller V. A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med 1979;9:139–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hardy G, Shapiro D, Haynes C, Rick J. Validation of the General Health Questionnaire-12; using a sample of employees from England’s health care services. Psychol Assess 1999;11:159–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pevalin D. Multiple applications of the GHQ-12 in a general population sample: An investigation of long-term retest effects. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2001;35:508–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reijneveld S, Schene A. Higher prevalence of mental disorders in socio-economically deprived urban areas in the Netherlands: Community or personal disadvantage? J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wells-Parker E, Ceminsky J, Hallberg V, Snow R, Dunaway G, Guiling S, et al. An exploratory study of the relationship between road rage and crash experience in a representative sample of US drivers. Accid Anal Prev 2000;34:271–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goldstein P. Drugs and violence crime. In: Weiner N, Wolfgang M (Eds.), Pathways to Criminal Violence. London, UK: Sage, 1990;16–48.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Haynes P. Drug using offenders in South London: Trend and outcomes. J Substance Abuse Treatment 1998;15:449–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Inciardi J, Horowitz R, Pottiger A. Street Kids, Street Drugs, Street Crime: An Examination of Drug Use and Serious Delinquency in Miami. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1993.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mann R, Anglin L, Wilkins K, Vingilis E, Macdonald S. Mortality in a sample of convicted drinking drivers. Addiction 1993;88:643–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pernanen K. The uses of ‘disinhibition’ in the explanation of alcohol-related behaviour. Contemporary Drug Problems 1997;24:703–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wells S, Graham K, West P. Alcohol related aggression in the general population. J Stud Alcohol 2000;61:626–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang L, Welte J, Wieczorek W. Youth gangs, drug use, and delinquency. J Criminal Justice 1999;27:101–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Blanchard E, Hickling E, Taylor A, Loos W, Gerardi R. Psychological morbidity associated with motor vehicle accidents. Behav Res Ther 1994;32:283–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Udwin O. Children’s reaction to traumatic events. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1993;34:115–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Breslau N. Epidemiological studies of trauma, posttraumatic stress disorder and other psychiatric disorders. Can J Psychiatry 2002;47:923–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Garmezy N, Rutter M. Acute reactions to stress. In: Rutter M, Hersov L (Eds.), Child and Adolescent Psychiatry; Modern Approaches. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1985;152–67.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Coccaro E. Intermittent explosive disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2000;2:67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Galovski T, Blanchard E. The effectiveness of a brief psychological intervention on court referred and self-referred aggressive drivers. Behav Res Ther 2002;40:1385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Harrison L, Hughes A. The validity of self-report drug use and improving the accuracy of survey estimates. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph 1997; Series 167.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wagenaar A, Kmrok K, McGovern P, Williams T, Perry C. Effects of saliva test pipeline procedure on adolescent self-report alcohol use. Addict 1993;88:199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 42.
    Wagenaar A, Kmrok K, McGovern P, Williams T, Perry C. Effects of saliva test pipeline procedure on adolescent self-report alcohol use. Addict 1993;88:199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer E. Butters
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert E. Mann
    • 2
  • Reginald G. Smart
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Urban Health Initiatives, University College Room 259AUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Social, Prevention and Health Policy Research DepartmentCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations