Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 97, Issue 1, pp 20–23 | Cite as

Economic Gains of a Home Fortification Program

Evaluation of “Sprinkles” from the Provider’s Perspective
  • Waseem Sharieff
  • Susan E. Horton
  • Stanley Zlotkin
Research

Abstract

Introduction: This paper models the effects of a home-fortification program (using Sprinkles which contain zinc and iron and other micronutrients), in Pakistan, a country with high levels of infant mortality, anemia, and diarrhea. It uses the results of randomized trials of the effect of Sprinkles on anemia and on longitudinal prevalence of diarrhea.

Methods: Based on previous literature, the effect of Sprinkles on intermediate outcomes (diarrhea and anemia) is linked to longer-term outcomes (infant and young child mortality, and cognitive achievement and hence adult wages). Three different measures of cost effectiveness are presented: the cost per death averted (effect via zinc supplementation on reduction of longitudinal prevalence of diarrhea); the cost per ‘disability adjusted life year’ (DALY) saved (same modality); and the gain in earnings due to higher cognitive functioning for each dollar spent (effect via iron supplementation on reduced anemia).

Results: We estimated that the cost per death averted is $406 ($273–$3248), the cost per DALY saved is $12.2 ($8–$97) and the present value of the gain in earnings is $37 ($18- $51) for each dollar spent on the Sprinkles program. These estimates were developed for a low-income country (GDP per capita = $417) with a high infant mortality rate (IMR = 83/1000), high prevalence of anemia (93%), and high mean longitudinal prevalence of diarrhea (17%).

Discussion: These outcomes are particularly favourable in Pakistan. The outcomes are more favourable when used with children 6–12 months. Further longer-run field trials of Sprinkles with larger populations would be helpful.

MeSH terms

Home fortification zinc deficiency iron deficiency anemia diarrhea costeffectiveness Sprinkles 

Résumé

Introduction: Un modèle a été utilisé pour évaluer l’effet d’un programme pour enrichir les aliments à domicile (en utilisant les suppléments Sprinkles contenant du zinc et du fer, ainsi que d’autres micronutriments) au Pakistan, un pays où les taux de mortalité infantile, d’anémie et de diarrhée sont élevés. Le modèle comprend les résultats d’essais cliniques randomisés de l’effet des Sprinkles sur l’anémie et sur la prévalence longitudinale de la diarrhée.

Méthode: La documentation existante suggère que les effets des Sprinkles à moyen terme (sur la diarrhée et l’anémie) sont liés à certains effets à plus long terme (baisse de la mortalité infantile et post-infantile, meilleur développement cognitif, et donc revenus plus élevés à l’âge adulte). Nous présentons trois mesures différentes de l’efficacité par rapport au coût: le coût par décès évité (en réduisant la prévalence longitudinale de la diarrhée grâce à la supplémentation en zinc); le coût par « année de vie épargnée pondérée par l’invalidité » (DALY) (toujours grâce à la supplémentation en zinc); et le gain de revenus dû à un fonctionnement cognitif supérieur pour chaque dollar dépensé (en réduisant la prévalence de l’anémie grâce à la supplémentation en fer).

Résultats: Nous avons estimé que, pour chaque dollar dépensé sur le programme Sprinkles, le coût par décès évité est de 406 $ (273 $–3 248 $), le coût par DALY épargnée est de 12,20 $ (8 $–97 $), et le gain de revenus actuel est de 37 $ (18 $–51 $). Ces estimations ont été élaborées pour un pays à faible revenu (PNB par habitant = 417 $) avec un taux élevé de mortalité infantile (TMI = 83/1 000), une prévalence élevée d’anémie (93 %) et une prévalence longitudinale moyennement élevée de diarrhée (17 %).

Discussion: Ces résultats sont particulièrement favorables dans un environnement aux taux élevés de mortalité infantile, d’anémie et de diarrhée comme le Pakistan. Les résultats sont plus favorables chez les enfants âgés de 6 à 12 mois. Il serait utile de mener d’autres essais avec les suppléments Sprinkles, sur le terrain, à plus long terme et avec un plus grand nombre de participants.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bern C, Martines J, de Zoysa I, Glass, RI. The magnitude of the global problem of diarrhoeal disease: A ten-year update. Bull WHO 1992;70(6):705–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmed M, Billoo AG, Murtaza G. Risk factors of persistent diarrhoea in children below five years of age. J Pak Med Assoc 1995;45(11):290–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henry, FJ. The epidemiologic importance of dysentery in communities. Rev Infect Dis 1991;13(S4):S238–S244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khan, KS. Setting health care priorities in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 1995;45(8):222–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yoon PW, Black RE, Moulton LH, Becker S. The effect of malnutrition on the risk of diarrheal and respiratory mortality in children < 2 y of age in Cebu, Philippines. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;65(4):1070–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Molla A, Khurshid M, Molla AM, Badruddin SH, Hendricks K, Snyder, JD. Is anemia an accurate predictor of vitamin A status in Pakistani children. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1993;49(2):276–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lozoff B, Brittenham GM, Wolf AW, McClish DK, Kuhnert PM, Jiminez E, et al. Iron-deficiency anemia and iron therapy effects on infant developmental test performance. Pediatr 1987;79:981–95.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Politt E. Iron deficiency and cognitive function. Ann Rev Nutr 1993;13:521–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zlotkin S, Arthur P, Antwi KY, Yeung G. Treatment of anemia with microencapsulated ferrous fumarate plus ascorbic acid supplied as sprinkles to complementary (weaning) foods. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;74(6):791–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sharieff W, Bhutta Z, Zlotkin S. A 3 arm randomized, double blind placebo controlled communitybased trial of probiotic and micronutrients ‘Sprinkles’ added to standard management of uncomplicated diarrhea in infants. Proceedings from Annual Scientific Exchange, Institut Rosell-Lallemand Nutrition Group, September 12, 2003.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morris SS, Cousens SN, Kirkwood BR, Arthur P, Ross, DA. Is prevalence of diarrhea a better predictor of subsequent mortality and weight gain than diarrhea incidence. Am J Epidemiol 1996;144(6):582–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bhutta ZA, Black RE, Brown KH, Gardner JM, Gore S, Hidayat A, et al. Prevention of diarrhea and pneumonia by zinc supplementation in children in developing countries: Pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Zinc Investigators’ Collaborative Group. J Pediatr 1999;135(6):689–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shah S, Yousafzai M, Lakhani N, Chotani R, Nowshad G. Prevalence and correlates of diarrhea. Indian J Pediatr 2003;70(3):207–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luby SP, Agboatwalla M, Painter J, Altaf A, Billhimer WL, Hoekstra, RM. Effect of intensive handwashing promotion on childhood diarrhea in high-risk communities in Pakistan: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;291(21):2547–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baltussen R, Knai C, Sharan M. Iron fortification and iron supplementation are cost-effective interventions to reduce iron deficiency in four subregions of the world. J Nutr 2004;134(10):2678–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nuria Homedes. The disability adjusted life year (DALY) definition, measurement and potential use. Human Capital development and operation policy. Working papers. Available online at: http://www.worldbank.org. (Accessed on December 11, 2004).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bhutta ZA, Nizami SQ, Isani Z. Zinc supplementation in malnourished children with persistent diarrhea in Pakistan. Pediatrics 1999;103(4):e42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paracha PI, Hameed A, Simon J, Jamil A, Nawab G. Prevalence of anaemia in semi-urban areas of Peshawar, Pakistan: A challenge for health professionals and policy makers. J Pak Med Assoc 1997;47(2):49–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sharieff W. Predicting Outcomes of Micronutrient Intervention from a Computer Simulation Model for New Clinical Trials. [video]. Toronto, ON: ICES, 2004. Available online at: http://clinepi.ices.on.ca (Accessed on June 10, 2004).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Palti H, Peusner B, Adler B. Does anemia in infancy affect achievement on development and intelligence tests. Human Biol 1983;55:194–98.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lozoff B, Jimenez MD, Wolf, AW. Long-term development outcome of infants with iron deficiency. N Engl J Med 1991;325:687–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Campbell F, Pungello E, Miller-Johnson S, Burchinal M, Ramey C. The development of cognitive and academic abilities: Growth curves from an early childhood educational experiment. Dev Psychol 2001;37(2):231–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Salkever D. Updated estimates of earnings benefits from reduced exposure of children to environmental lead. Environ Res 1995;70:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Horton S, Ross J. The economics of iron deficiency. Food Policy 2003;28:51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Black RE, Brown KH, Becker S, Yunus M. Longitudinal studies of infectious diseases and physical growth of children in rural Bangladesh, I. Patterns of morbidity. Am J Epidemiol 1982;115:305–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Copenhagen Consensus: The Results. Available online at: http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com (Accessed on January 18, 2005).
  27. 27.
    Loevinsohn BP, Sutter RW, Costales, MO. Using cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate targeting strategies: The case of vitamin A supplementation. Health Policy Plan 1997;12(1):29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fiedler, JL. The Nepal National Vitamin A Program: Prototype to emulate or donor enclave. Health Policy Plan 2000;15(2):145–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Horton S, Sanghvi T, Phillips M, Fiedler J, Perez-Escamilla R, Lutter C, et al. Breastfeeding promotion and priority setting in health. Health Policy Plan 1996;11(2):156–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Martines J, Phillips M, Feachem R. Diarrheal diseases. In: Jamison D, Mosley W, Measham A, Bobadilla J. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Creese A, Floyd K, Alban A, Guinness L. Costeffectiveness of HIV/AIDS interventions in Africa: A systematic review of the evidence. Lancet 2002;359(9318):1635–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Waseem Sharieff
    • 1
    • 4
  • Susan E. Horton
    • 2
  • Stanley Zlotkin
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, the Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Wilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada
  3. 3.Department of Paediatrics, Nutritional Sciences, and Public Health Sciences, The Centre for International Health, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoCanada
  4. 4.Medical Advisory SecretariatMinistry of Health and Long-Term Care, Government of OntarioCanada

Personalised recommendations