Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 93, Issue 3, pp 219–222 | Cite as

Safer and Unsafe Injection Drug Use and Sex Practices Among Injection Drug Users in Halifax, Nova Scotia

An Exploratory Look at Community and Interpersonal Influences
  • Lois A. JacksonEmail author
  • Diane L. Bailey
  • John R. Fraser
  • J. Ken Johnson
  • Andrea Currie
  • Debbie D. Babineau


Objective: This qualitative study sought to explore the community and interpersonal (e.g., peer) influences affecting safer and unsafe injection drug use and sexual practices among injection drug users (IDUs) living in and around Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Method: Sixty semi-structured interviews were conducted with IDUs, and key themes were identified. Two focus groups were also conducted to obtain feedback on the findings.

Results: There are key community and peer influences on drug use and sex practices. Needle exchange provides community access to clean needles, but when the needle exchange is closed, accessibility is an issue. Peers at times assist in reducing sharing by providing clean needles to friends who are without a needle or cannot access needles because of their circumstances (e.g., in prison). Peers also sometimes encourage condom use, but in certain contexts (e.g., with an intimate partner) condom use is often not supported.

Interpretation: Expanded and new prevention strategies — especially those utilizing peers — are urgently needed to discourage unsafe practices, and encourage safer practices among this population.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Advisory Committee on Population Health with Federal, Provincial and Territorial Committees representing drugs, AIDS, corrections and justice. Reducing the Harm Associated with Injection Drug Use in Canada. 2000, unpublished document.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coates R, Rankin J, Lamothe F, Arshinoff R, Raboud J, Millson M, et al. Needle sharing behaviour among injection drug users (IDUs) in Treatment in Montreal and Toronto, 1988–1989. Can J Public Health 1992;83(1):38–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fischer B, Rehm J, Blitz-Miller T. Injection drug use and preventive measures: A comparison of Canadian and Western European jurisdictions over time. CMAJ 2000;162(12):1709–13.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Millson M, Myers T, Rankin J, McLaughlin B, Major C, Mindell W, et al. Prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus and associated risk behaviour in injection drug users in Toronto. Can J Public Health 1995;86(3):176–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    National Action Plan. HIV, AIDS and Injection Drug Use. A project of the National AIDS Strategy in collaboration with Canada’s Drug Strategy, Health Canada. 1997.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Des Jarlais D, Friedman S. Strategies for preventing HIV infection among injecting drug users: Taking interventions to the people. In: Integrating Behavioral and Social Sciences with Public Health. Washington: American Public Health Association, 2001;141–58.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elnitsky S, Abernathy T. Calgary’s needle exchange program: Profile of injection drug users. Can J Public Health 1993;84(3):177–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laurie M, Kathryn G. Health risks and opportunities for harm reduction among injection drug-using clients of Saskatoon’s needle exchange program. Can J Public Health 2000;91(5):350–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stimson G. AIDS and injecting drug use in the United Kingdom, 1987-1993: The policy response and the prevention of the epidemic. Soc Sci Med 1995;41(5):699–716.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anderson J. Holding the lid on HIV. Can J Public Health 1999;90(5):296–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hankins C. Needle exchange: Panacea or problem? CMAJ 1997;157:275–77.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Canadian Liver Foundation, National Hepatitis C Education Programme. Hepatitis C, Medical Information Update. Can J Public Health 2000;91(1):S4–S9.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    DesJarlais D, Schuchat A. Hepatitis C among drug users: Déjà vu all over again? Am J Public Health 2001;91(1):21–22.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Diaz T, DesJarlais D, Vlahov D, Perlis T, Edwards V, Friedman S, et al. Factors associated with prevalent hepatitis C: Differences among young adult injection drug users in lower and upper Manhattan, New York. Am J Public Health 2001;91(1):23–30.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hagan H, Thiede H, Weiss NS, Hopkin G. Sharing of drug preparation equipment as a risk factor for hepatitis C. Am J Public Health 2001;91(1):42–46.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Health Canada. HIV/AIDS Epi update. Bureau of HIV/AIDS, STD and TB update series, Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control. April 2000.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nova Scotia Department of Health, Eastern Region Health District and LCDC, Health Canada. Seroprevalence of HIV, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Viruses and High Risk Behaviours Among IDU and Sexual Partners of IDUs. The Eastern Region Project, unpublished report, June 1998.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Atlani L, Carael M, Brunet J, Frasca R, Chaika N. Social change and HIV in the former USSR: The making of a new epidemic. Soc Sci Med 2000;20(11):1547–56.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harvey, M. New kinds of data, new options for HIV prevention among women: A public health challenge. Health Education and Behavior 2000;27(5):566–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maticka-Tyndale E, Lewis J, Clark J, Zubick J, et al. Social and cultural vulnerability to sexually transmitted infection: The work of exotic dancers. Can J Public Health 1999;90(1):19–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Neaigus A, Friedman S, Curtis R, Des Jarlais D, Furst T, Jose B, et al. The relevance of drug injectors’ social and risk networks for understanding and preventing HIV infection. Soc Sci Med 1994;38(1):67–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rhodes T, Quirk A. Drug users sexual relationships and the social organization of risk: The sexual relationship as a site of risk management. Soc Sci Med 1998;46(2):157–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Strauss A. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. San Francisco: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sterk C. Fast Lives: Women Who Use Crack Cocaine. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lois A. Jackson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Diane L. Bailey
    • 2
  • John R. Fraser
    • 3
  • J. Ken Johnson
    • 4
  • Andrea Currie
    • 5
  • Debbie D. Babineau
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Health and Human PerformanceDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Mainline Needle ExchangeHalifaxCanada
  3. 3.North End Community Health CentreHalifaxCanada
  4. 4.QE II Health SciencesHalifaxCanada
  5. 5.Community WorkerHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations