Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 101, Issue 5, pp 380–384 | Cite as

Workplace Experiences of Young Workers in Ontario

  • John H. LewkoEmail author
  • Carol W. Runyan
  • Cindy-Lynne S. Tremblay
  • John A. Staley
  • Richard Volpe
Quantitative Research
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

We examine the workplace experiences of Ontario youth in the service sector, with a particular interest in hazard exposures, safety training and supervision.

Method

A cross-sectional telephone survey in 2008 of working youth aged 14–18. Items queried respondents about the tasks performed, worker training and supervision. The study parallels one already published in the US. This is the first Canadian study of its kind.

Results

Although teens reported working more hours during vacation, a substantial number of youth are working at least 20 hours per week when school is in session, and many reported having worked after 11 pm on a night before school. Young workers engaged in a variety of hazardous tasks, including heavy lifting, using sharp objects, working with hot equipment, or working around falling objects. A small subset (7.5%) of teens had suffered an injury at work that was severe enough to cause them to miss a day of school or work or require medical attention. The majority of workers had received training on how to use equipment safely and how to avoid an injury. More females than males received training. Although regular check-ins were common, many youth (38%) said they had worked at least part of the day without supervision. Young females were most likely to work without supervision or to work alone.

Conclusion

This study questions whether the regulations in Ontario are sufficient to protect young workers from exposures to work-related hazards.

Key words

Safety youth workplace hazards training supervision 

Résumé

Objectifs

Examiner le travail des jeunes de l’Ontario dans le secteur des services en nous attachant particulièrement à l’exposition aux risques, à la formation SST et à la supervision.

Méthode

Enquête téléphonique transversale menée en 2008 auprès de jeunes travailleurs de 14 à 18 ans. Les questions portaient sur les tâches effectuées, la formation des travailleurs et la supervision. L’étude s’inspire d’une étude parue aux États-Unis. C’est la première du genre au Canada.

Résultats

Les adolescents disent travailler plus d’heures durant les vacances, mais un bon nombre travaillent au moins 20 heures par semaine durant l’année scolaire, et beaucoup disent travailler passé 23 h même quand ils ont de l’école le lendemain. Ces jeunes effectuent des tâches diverses, dont soulever des objets lourds, manipuler des objets tranchants, travailler avec de l’équipement chaud ou travailler autour d’objets qui tombent. Un petit sous-groupe (7,5 %) avait subi au des blessures suffisamment graves au travail pour manquer un jour d’école ou de travail ou pour nécessiter une visite médicale. La majorité des travailleurs est formée à l’utilisation sécuritaire de l’équipement et à la prévention des accidents. Plus de filles que de garçons reçoivent une formation. Les vérifications périodiques sont courantes, mais beaucoup de jeunes (38 %) disent travailler au moins une partie de la journée sans supervision. Les filles sont plus susceptibles de travailler seules ou sans supervision.

Conclusion

Cette étude met en doute le fait que la réglementation ontarienne protège suffisamment les jeunes travailleurs contre les accidents du travail.

Mots clés

sécurité jeunes lieu de travail dangers formation supervision 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Statistics Canada. Employment by age, sex, type of work, class or worker and province. Labor Force Survey, Statistics Canada. Available at: https://doi.org/www.statcan.ca (Accessed November 24, 2008).
  2. 2.
    Herman AM. Report on the Youth Labor Force. US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Washington, DC: Office of Publication and Special Studies, 2000.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ontario Safety Alliance. Ontario Service Safety Alliance. Environmental Scan 2004. Available at: https://doi.org/www.ossa.ca (Accessed November 27, 2005).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Usalcas J. Youth and the Labor Market. Statistics Canada, Perspectives. November 2005. Catalogue no. 75-001-XIE.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barling J, Kelloway K. Young Workers: Varieties of Experience. Washington: American Psychological Association, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Breslin FC, Smith P, Mustard C, Zhao R. Young people and work injuries: An examination of jurisdictional variation within Canada. Inj Prev 2006;12:105–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Alert: Request for Assistance in Preventing Deaths and Injuries of Adolescent Workers. Department of Health and Human Services. Washington: DHHS (NIOSH) Publication, 2005.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Workplace Safety and Insurance Board. Young Worker Statistics. Workplace Safety Insurance Board, 2007. Available at: https://doi.org/www.wsib.on.ca (Accessed November 25, 2008).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Workplace Safety and Insurance Board. Current Health and Safety Statistics for Ontario, 2006. Available at: https://doi.org/www.wsib.on.ca (Accessed February 2, 2006).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duncan A, Lewko J, Volpe R, Tilleczek K, Blanco H, Tremblay C-L, et al. Do young workers see hazards in their workplace? Ontario Injury Prevention Conference 2006, Toronto, ON, 2006.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lipskie T, Breslin C. A descriptive analysis of Canadian youth treated in emergency departments for work-related injuries. Chron Dis Can 2005;26(4):107–13.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Runyan C, Schulman M, Dal Santo J, Bowling JM, Agans R, Ta M. Work-related hazards and safety of US adolescents employed in the retail and service sectors. Pediatrics 2007;119:526–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blanco H, LeBrasseur R, Lewko J, Tilleczek K, Volpe R, Wilson B-J, et al. Managing the health and safety interests of young workers in small businesses. Research Advisory Council, Workplace Safety Insurance Board, 2005.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Usalcas J, Bowlby G. Students in the Labor Market. Statistics Canada, 2006. Catalogue no. 81-004-XIE.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 5th Edition. 2008.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Department of Labor. Fair Labor Studies Act. Available at: https://doi.org/www.dol.gov/esa/regs/compliance/whd/whdfs43.htm (Accessed May 11, 2005).
  17. 17.
    Flin R. “Danger–Men at work”: Management influence on safety. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 2003;13:261–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Westaby JD, Lowe JK. Risk-taking orientation and injury among youth workers: Examining the social influence of supervisors, coworkers and parents. J Appl Psychol 2005;90:1297–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Human Resources and Social Development Canada. Minimum Age for Employment in Canada. 2006. Available at: https://doi.org/www.hrsdc.gc.ca (Accessed November 27, 2008).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Legislative Counsel Office. Youth Employment Act. Subsection 4, 5, 6. Last updated May 2009.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Carskadon MA. Factors influencing sleep patterns in adolescents. Adolescent Sleep Patterns: Biological, Social and Psychological Influences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002;4–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fuligni AJ, Hardway C. Daily variation in adolescents’ sleep, activities and psychological well-being. J Res Adolesc 2006;16(3):353–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zierold K, Anderson H. Severe injury and the need for improved safety training among working teens. Am J Health Behav 2006;30(5):525–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mortimer JT. Working and Growing Up in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Peek-Asa C, Erickson R, Kraus JF. Traumatic occupational fatalities in the retail industry. Am J Ind Med 1999;35(2):186–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Department of Education and Skills. Supervising Learners’ Health and Safety. Raising Standards Division, Study and Good Practice Transition Team. Sheffield, UK, 2001.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lewko J, Volpe R. Learning to Work Safely: A Guide to Managers and Educators. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 2009.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    US Department of Labor. The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. Employment Standards Administration, Youth Employment. Available at: https://doi.org/www.dol.gov/esa/whd/flsa/index.htm (Accessed May 11, 2005).

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • John H. Lewko
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carol W. Runyan
    • 1
  • Cindy-Lynne S. Tremblay
    • 2
  • John A. Staley
    • 3
  • Richard Volpe
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre for Research in Human DevelopmentLaurentian UniversitySudburyCanada
  2. 2.University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center and Gillings School of Global Public HealthChapel HillCanada
  3. 3.Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Public HealthKent State UniversityKentCanada
  4. 4.Life Span Adaptation Projects, Institute of Child Study and Department of Human Development and Applied PsychologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations