Advertisement

Journal of Quantitative Economics

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 133–160 | Cite as

Small Sample Properties Of Existing And New Estimators Of The Autocorrelation Coefficient And Regression Coefficients In The Context Of Ar(1) Errors

  • Subhash C. Sharma
  • Brian Coleman
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

This study systematically and comprehensively investigates the small sample properties of the existing and some new estimators of the autocorrelation coefficient and of the regression coefficients in a linear regression model when errors follow an autoregressive process of order one. The new estimators of autocorrelation coefficient proposed here are based on the jackknife procedure. The jackknife procedure is applied in two alternative ways: first to the regression itself, and second to the residuals of the regression model. Next, the performance of the existing and new estimators of autocorrelation coefficient (thirty-three in total) is investigated in terms of bias and the root mean squared errors. Finally, we have systematically compared all of the estimators of the regression coefficients (again thirty-three) in terms of efficiency and their performance in hypothesis testing. We observe that the performance of the autocorrelation coefficient estimators is dependent upon the degree of autocorrelation and whether the autocorrelation is positive or negative. We do not observe a direct link between the bias and efficiency of an estimator. The performance of the estimators of the regression coefficients also depends upon the degree of autocorrelation. If the efficiency of regression estimator is of concern, then the iterative Prais-Winsten estimator should be used since it is most efficient for the widest range of independent variables and values of the autocorrelation coefficient. If testing of the hypothesis is of concern, then the estimators based on jackknife technique are certainly superior and are highly recommended. However, for negative values of the autocorrelation coefficient, the estimators based on Quenouille procedure and iterative Prais-Winsten estimator are comparable. But, for computational ease iterative Prais-Winsten estimator is recommended.

JEL Classification

C13 and C22 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beach, Charles M. and James G. MacKinnon, 1978. A maximum likelihood procedure for regression with autocorrelated errors, Econometrica 46, 1, 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Griffiths, W. E. and P. A. A. Beesley, 1984, The small sample properties of some preliminary test estimators in a linear model with autocorrelated errors, Journal of Econometrics 25, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Harvey, A.C., and I. D. McAvinchey, 1978. The small sample efficiency of two-step estimators in regression models with autoregressive disturbances, Discussion Paper No. 78-10, (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.).Google Scholar
  4. Hashimoto, N., 1989. Small sample properties of modified Prais-Winsten estimators in hypothesis testing in a linear model with AR(1) errors, Economics Letters 29, 147–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Judge, G., C. Hill, W. Griffiths, H. Lutkepohl, and T. Lee, 1985. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  6. King, M. L. and D. E. A. Giles, 1984. Autocorrelation pre-testing in the linear model: Estimation, testing and prediction, Journal of Econometrics 25, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kmenta, Jan, 1986. Elements of econometrics, (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  8. Kwok, Ben, and Michael R. Veall, 1988. The jackknife and regression with AR(1) errors, Economics Letters 26, 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Miyazaki, S. and W. E. Griffiths, 1984. The properties of some covariance matrix estimators in linear models with AR(1) errors, Economics Letters 14, 351–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ohtani, K., 1990. On estimating and testing in a linear regression model with autocorrelated errors, Journal of Econometrics 44, 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Park, R. E. and B. M. Mitchell, 1980. Estimating the autocorrelated error model with trended data, Journal of Econometrics, 13, 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Quenouille, M. H., 1949. Approximate tests of correlation in time series, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 11, Series B, 68–83.Google Scholar
  13. Rao, P. and Z. Griliches, 1969. Small-sample properties of several two-stage regression methods in the context of auto-correlated errors, Journal of the American Statistical Association 64, 253–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Spitzer, J. J., 1979. Small-sample properties of nonlinear least squares and maximum likelihood estimators in the context of autocorrelated errors, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ullah, A., V. K. Srivastava, L. Magee and A. Srivastava, 1983. Estimation of linear regression model with autocorrelated disturbances, Journal of Time Series Analysis 4, 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Econometric Society 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsSouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA
  2. 2.All State InsuranceChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations