Advertisement

Journal of Quantitative Economics

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 115–132 | Cite as

An Empirical Analysis Of Industrial Disputes: Evidence From Indian States

  • Kausik Chaudhuri
  • Rupayan Pal
Article

Abstract

This paper investigates the determinants of industrial disputes using data for fourteen major states of India over fifteen years from 1981 to 1996. We document that other than purely economic factors (e.g. wages, provident fund and other benefits, and factory size); socio-economic, institutional, and political factors have significant impact on industrial disputes. This supports the political economic view of the trade union behavior. We also provide the evidence that liberalization of Indian economy has enhanced industrial peace. Region specific factors as well as the ideology and characteristics of political parties in power of the state governments influence industrial disputes. Fixed capital per employee and overall growth rate of per capita state domestic products has negligible impact on industrial disputes.

Keywords

Industrial disputes Socio-economic factors Liberalization Political ideology India 

JEL Classification

J52 J53 C51 O53 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Annual Survey of Indian Industries, data base maintained by E.P.W Research Foundation, India.Google Scholar
  2. Ashenfelter, O. and G. E. Johnson (1969), ‘Bargaining Theory, Trade Unions, and Industrial Strike Activity’. American Economic Review, 59 (1), 35–49.Google Scholar
  3. Besley T. and R. Burgess (2003), “Can Labor Regulation Hinder Economic Performance? Evidence from India.” Quarterly Journal of Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  4. Cramton P., M. Gunderson and J. Tracy (1999), “The Effect of Collective Bargaining Legislation on Strikes and Wages,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 471–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Datt R. (2000), “Regional Patterns of Industrial Relations in India: Changing Scenario after Liberalization,” Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 43(4), 1061–1098.Google Scholar
  6. Fallon, P. and R.B. Lucas (1991), “The Impact of Changes in Job Security Regulations in India and Zimbabwe,” The World Bank Economic Review, 5(3), 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grover V. and A. Arora (1998), “Encyclopedia of India and her states,” 2nd edition, Deep & Deep Publications, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  8. Hicks, John R. (1932), The Theory of Wages, London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  9. Indian Labour Year Book, (various issues), Government of India, Labour Bureau.Google Scholar
  10. National Accounts Statistics, Department of Statistics, Ministry of Planning, Government of India.Google Scholar
  11. Owusu-Gyapong A. (1986), “Alternative Estimating Techniques for Panel Data on Strike Activity” Review of Economics and Statistics, LXVIII (3), 526–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ross, Arthur M. (1948), Trade Union Wage Policy, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Saha, B. and I. Pan (1994), “Industrial Disputes in India”, Economic and Political Weekly, April 30, 1081–1087.Google Scholar
  14. Tracy S. J. (1986) “An Investigation into the Determinants of U.S. Strike Activity,” American Economic Review, 76(3), 423–436.Google Scholar
  15. Tracy S. J. (1987), “An Empirical Test of an Asymmetric Information Model of Strikes,” Journal of Labor Economics, 5(2), 149–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wooldridge J. M. (2001) “Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data,” MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Econometric Society 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indira Gandhi Institute of Development ResearchGen. A.K. Vaidya Marg Santosh NagarMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations