Journal of Quantitative Economics

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 101–114 | Cite as

Modeling Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag Models: A New Approach

  • K. SurekhaEmail author


It is a common practice in econometrics that estimation is carried out in terms of the reduced form parameters and the structural form parameters are retrieved using the functional relationship between structural form parameters and the reduced form parameters. The reduced form of many useful economic models is a nonlinear distributed lag model (NLADL) with error structure which may have autocorrelation. In addition, the relationship between the reduced form and the structural parameters is often nonlinear and in a ratio form. In such situations existing sampling theory estimation procedures result in estimators for the structural parameters which do not have finite moments and do not possess optimal sampling properties. As an alternative, we propose a two step Bayesian estimation method. The Bayesian method has great potential and allows us to obtain the posterior probability density functions of all parameters of interest. In particular, its application for the analysis of adaptive expectation partial adjustment models for which the reduced form is a NLADL model, has been found extremely useful. An application to Nerlove’s supply response function supports the proposed methodology.

JEL Classification

C11 C52 C39 


Nonlinear distributed lag infinite moments Bayesian estimation posterior pdfs 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cagan, P. 1956: The monetary dynamics of hyper–inflation, in Studies in the Quantity of Money, ed.M. Friedman, Univ. of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Chandok, H 1990: India Database, the economy Vol. I & II, L.M. Books, Delhi.Google Scholar
  3. Diebold, F.X. and Lamb, R.L. 1997: Why are estimates of agricultural supply response so variable? Journal of Econometrics.Google Scholar
  4. Fomby, T.B. and Guilkey, D.K. 1978: On choosing the optimal level of significance for the Durbin-Watson test and the Bayesian alternative, Journal of Econometrics, Vol 8, No. 2, 202–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Friedman, M., 1956: A Theory of the Consumption Function, Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  6. Gelfand, A.E. and Smith, A.F.M. 1990: Sampling Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities, Journal of American Statistical Association, 85, 398–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gemen. S. and Gemen, D. 1984: Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and Bayesian restoration of Images, IEEE transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6, 721–741.Google Scholar
  8. Ghali. M. 1996: Temporal aggregation and estimation of inventory functions, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 77, p. 464–469.Google Scholar
  9. Holt, C., Modigliani, F., Muth, J. and Simon, M. 1960: Planning Production, Inventories and Workforce, Prentice Hall, N.J.Google Scholar
  10. Lovell, M.C. 1986: Tests of the Rational Expectations Hypothesis, American Economic Review, 76, 110–124.Google Scholar
  11. Lovell, M. C. 1993: Simulating the Inventories Cycles, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 21, p. 147–179.Google Scholar
  12. Muth, J. 1960, Optimal properties of Exponentially Weighted forecasts, journal of American Statistical Association, 55, 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Muth, J. 1961: Rational Expectations and the THEORY OF Price Movements, Econometrica, Vol. 29, N0. 6, pp. 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Muth, J. 1985: Short run forecasts of business activity, paper presented at the International Society for Inventory Research, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  15. Nerlove, M. 1958: The Dynamics of Supply: estimation of farmer’s response to price, John Hopkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  16. Sargent, T.J. and N. Wallace, 1973, Rational Expectations and the Dynamics of Hyperinflation,” International Economic Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 328–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Surekha, K. 1996: Econometric Issues and Bayesian Analysis of Adaptive Expectation partial adjustment models, mimeo: ISI, Bangalore.Google Scholar
  18. Surekha, K. and Ghali, M. 2001: Speed of Adjustment and Production Smoothing Hypothesis, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 71, 1–3, 55-65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sethuraman, J. 1995: Easily Verifiable conditions for the convergence of the Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method, mimeograph, Indian Statistical Institute, Bangalore and Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.Google Scholar
  20. Tanner, M and Wong, W. 1987: The calculation of posterior distribution by data augmentation, Journal of American Statistical Association, 82, 528–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zaman, A, 1981, Estimators without Moments, Journal of Econometrics, 15, 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zellner, A, 1971, Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Zellner, A, 1978, Estimation of functions of population means and regression coefficients including structural coefficients: A minimum expected loss approach, Journal of Econometrics, 8, 127–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zellner, A. and Giesel, M.S. 1970, Analysis of distributed lag models with applications to consumption function estimation, Econometrica, 6, 865–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zellner, A., Min, C. and Dallaire, D. 1994: Bayesian Analysis of Simultaneous equation, asset -pricing and related models using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques and convergence checks, report of the Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  26. Zellner, A. and Park, S.B. 1979, Minimum expected loss estimators for functions of parameters and structural coefficients of Econometric models, Journal of American Statistical Association, 74, 185–193.Google Scholar
  27. Zellner, A and Rossi, P.E. 1984: Bayesian Analysis of Dichotomous Quantal Response Model, Journal of Econometrics, 25, 365–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Econometric Society 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and EconomicsIndian University NorthwestGaryIndia

Personalised recommendations