Aeroelastic Stability Estimation of Control Surfaces with Freeplay Nonlinearity
This work discusses the quantitative stability evaluation of aeroelastic problems with freeplay in the control surfaces. Stability estimation of linear time invariant and linear time periodic systems rely on eigenanalysis of state transition matrices and implies simplifications on the problems governed by nonlinear non-autonomous equations. Lyapunov Characteristic Exponents directly provide quantitative information on the stability of nonlinear non-autonomous dynamical systems. Stability estimation using Lyapunov Characteristic Exponents does not require a special reference solution and is consistent with the eigensolution of linear time invariant and Floquet-Lyapunov analysis of linear time periodic systems. Thus, they represent a natural generalization of conventional stability analysis. The Discrete QR method is used to practically estimate the Lyapunov Characteristic Exponents. The method is applied to a three-dimensional aeroelastic problem with freeplay introduced to the control surface.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 7.J.E. Shigley and C.R. Mischke. Standard Handbook of Machine Design. McGraw-Hill, 2 edition, 1996.Google Scholar
- 8.Dan B. Marghitu, editor. Mechanical Engineer’s Handbook. Academic Press, 2001.Google Scholar
- 9.D. Eller. Friction, freeplay and flutter of manually controlled aircraft. In International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Stockholm, Sweden, June 2007.Google Scholar
- 11.Giancarlo Benettin, Luigi Galgani, Antonio Giorgilli, and Jean-Marie Strelcyn. Lyapunov characteristic exponents for smooth dynamical systems and for Hamiltonian systems; a method for computing all of them. part 1: Theory. Meccanica, 15(1):9–20, March 1980. doi:10.1007/BF02128236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Luca Dieci and Erik S. Van Vleck. Lyapunov and other spectra: a survey. In Donald Estep and Simon Taverner, editors, Collected lectures on the preservation of stability under discretization, chapter 11, pages 197–218. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA (USA), 2002.Google Scholar
- 16.Piergiovanni Marzocca Liviu Librescu, Gianfranco Chiocchia. Implications of cubic physical/aerodynamic non-linearities on the character of the flutter instability boundary. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 38(2):173–199, March 2003. doi:10.1016/S0020-7462(01)00054-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Pierangelo Masarati. Estimation of Lyapunov exponents from multibody dynamics in differential-algebraic form. Proc. IMechE Part K: J. Multi-body Dynamics, 227(4):23–33, 2013. doi:10.1177/1464419312455754.Google Scholar
- 23.Pierangelo Masarati and Aykut Tamer. The real schur decomposition estimates lyapunov characteristic exponents with multiplicity greater than one. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics, 230(4):568–578, 2016.Google Scholar
- 26.T. Theodorsen and I.E. Garrick, Nonstationary flow about a wing-aileron-tab combination including aerodynamic balance. Report 736, NACA, 1942.Google Scholar
- 29.Rui Vasconcellos, Abdessattar Abdelkefi, Muhammad R. Hajj, and Flavio Marques. Discontinuity induced bifurcation in aeroelastic systems with freeplay nonlinearity. In 22nd International Congress of Mechanical Engineering (COBEM’13), pages 2832–2843, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brasil, November 3–7 2013.Google Scholar