Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio

, Volume 96, Issue 3, pp 124–135 | Cite as

Transferring an Earth-based adaptive optics technology to space telescopes

  • M. Bevilacqua
  • L. Dozio
  • P. Mantegazza


The present work is aimed at studying the application of a contactless voice-coil actuation technology, currently developed for some new-generation earth telescopes, to an hypothetical secondary mirror of a space telescope subjected to nanometric precision requirements. The technology involves a large number of electromagnetic actuators which are not in contact with the optical mirror. Each actuator is made by a fixed coil wound on a cold finger and a moving magnet, glued to the rear surface of the thin adaptive mirror. A stiff backplate provides the position reference. The gap between the mirror and the backplate is measured through co-located capacitive sensors. Since future space telescopes will operate at cryogenics temperatures, where the material damping is extremely small, the design of high-performance and stable active shape controllers without detrimental spillover effects is challenging. Due to the impossibility to exploit aerodynamic damping arising from the squeezed air film between the mirror and the backplate, as done on earth-based mirrors, there is the need of finding an alternative to damp out vibrations. For this purpose, the current-driven technology implemented in earth-based applications is replaced by a voltage-driven solution, which provides damping augmentation by means of eddy currents. This is crucial in achieving a sufficiently stable dynamic response. The related limitation in the control bandwidth is fully compatible with the promptness requirements of the control system for the application under study.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. Laslandes, C. Hourtoule, E. Hugot, et al., “Space active optics: performance of a deformable mirror for in-situ wavefront correction in space telescopes”, Proc. SPIE, 8442, 2012.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Manetti, M. Morandini and P. Mantegazza, “Control System Design of Active Primary Mirror for the Advanced LIDAR Concept Satellite”, Internal Report, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, 2007.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.C. Redding, G. Hickey, G. Agnes, et al., “Active Optics for a 16-Meter Advanced Technology Large Aperture Space Telescope”, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech, CA, 2008.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Laslandes, E. Hugot, M. Ferrari, et al., “Mirror actively deformed and regulated for applications in space: design and performance”, Optical Engineering, Vol. 52, No. 9, 2013.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Zuccaro Marchi, P. Hallibert, J. Pereira do Carmo, and E. Wille, “Active optics for space applications: an ESA perspective”, Proc. SPIE, 9151, 2014.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.P. Gardner, J.C. Mather, M. Clampin, et al., “The James Webb Space Telescope”, Space Science Reviews, Vol. 123, No. 4, 2006.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P.Y. Madec, “Overview of deformable mirror technologies for adaptive optics and astronomy”, Proc. SPIE, 8447, 2012.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Biasi, D. Gallieni, P. Salinari, et al., “Contactless thin adaptive mirror technology: past, present, and future”, Proc. SPIE, 7736, 2010.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    “Announcement of Opportunity: Active Optics correction chain for large monolithic mirrors”, European Space Agency, 2014.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Manetti, “High precision shape control of massively actuated, magnetically levitated, secondary adaptive mirrors for extremely large telescopes”, PhD Thesis, Politecnico di Milano, 2010.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Manetti, M. Morandini and P. Mantegazza, “High precision massive shape control of magnetically levitated adaptive mirrors”, Control Engineering Practice, Vol. 18, No.12, pp. 1386–1398, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Manetti, M. Morandini and P. Mantegazza, “Self-Tuning Shape Control of Massively Actuated Adaptive Mirrors”, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 22, No.3, pp. 838–852, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Manetti, M. Morandini, P. Mantegazza, et al., “Modeling and control of massively actuated, magnetically levitated, adaptive mirrors”, IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, pp. 860–866, 2010.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Manetti, M. Morandini, P. Mantegazza, et al., “Experimental validation of massively actuated deformable adaptive mirror numerical models”, Control Engineering Practice, Vol. 20, No.8, pp. 783–791, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    SCHOTT, glass made of ideas,
  16. 16.
    M.B. Levine and C. White, “Material damping experiments at cryogenic temperatures”, Optical Science and Technology, SPIE’s 48th Annual Meeting, pp. 165–176, 2003.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C.-Y. Peng, M.B. Levine, L. Shido, and R.S. Leland, “Experimental observations on material damping at cryogenic temperatures”, Optical Science and Technology, the SPIE 49th Annual Meeting, pp. 44–62, 2004.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    C.-Y. Peng, M.B. Levine, L. Shido, et al., “Measurement of vibrational damping at cryogenic temperatures for silicon carbide foam and silicon foam materials”, Proc. SPIE, 5868, 2005.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A.C. Carrier, B. Romney and R. Mihara, “Damping characteristics of composite petal structure for an 8-m diameter telescope at cryogenic temperature”, Proc. SPIE, 5487, 2004.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Bevilacqua, “Transferring an Earth Based Adaptive Optics Technology to Space”, Master Thesis, Politecnico di Milano, 2015.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Kwakernaak and R. Sivan, Linear optimal control systems, Wiley, 1972.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C.C. Lin, K.H. Lu and L.L. Chung, “Optimal discrete-time structural control using direct output feedback”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 18, No.6, pp. 472–480, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Isermann, Digital control systems - Volume 2: Stochastic control, multivariable control, adaptive control, applications, 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. Skelton, K.M. Grigoriadis and T. Iwasaki, A unified algebraic approach to linear control design, Taylor and Francis, London, 1998.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    J.D. Johnston, J.M. Howard, G.E. Mosier, et al., “Integrated modeling activities for the James Webb Space Telescope: structural-thermal-optical analysis”, Proc. SPIE, 5487, 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© AIDAA Associazione Italiana di Aeronautica e Astronautica 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Bevilacqua
    • 1
  • L. Dozio
    • 1
  • P. Mantegazza
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie AerospazialiPolitecnico di MilanoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations