Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 90, Issue 5, pp 330–333 | Cite as

Interactions Between Smokers and Non-Smokers in Public Places: A Qualitative Study

  • Blake D. PolandEmail author
  • Lisa Stockton
  • Mary Jane Ashley
  • Linda Pederson
  • Joanna Cohen
  • Roberta Ferrence
  • Shelley Bull
Article

Abstract

Few studies have employed a qualitative approach to better understand how both smokers and non-smokers experience and make sense of no-smoking restrictions in their daily lives. We describe qualitative research involving an examination of self-reported interpersonal interactions between smokers and non-smokers in public places regarding exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). Five focus group discussions and twenty individual in-depth interviews were conducted with smokers and non-smokers in the Metropolitan Toronto region as a complement to a quantitative survey of the adult population of Ontario. Strategies used by non-smokers in responding to ETS exposures included verbal confrontations, non-verbal cues, use of a third party, and moving away. The perceived consequences of such actions, as described by both smokers and non-smokers, are discussed, together with implications for tobacco control policy and practice.

Résumé

Peu d’études ont utilisé l’approche qualitative pour mieux comprendre comment les fumeurs et les non fumeurs font l’expérience — dans la vie quotidienne — des restrictions face à l’usage du tabac. Nous décrivons des recherches qualitatives qui impliquent un examen des relations interpersonnelles entre fumeurs et non fumeurs dans les endroits publiques; principalement en ce qui concerne l’exposition à la fumée de tabac dans l’environnement. Cinq groupes de discussion et vingt interviews d’individus en profondeur, ont été réalisés avec des fumeurs et non fumeurs dans la région métropolitaine de Toronto, comme complément à une enquête auprès de la population adulte ontarienne. Les stratégies employées par les non fumeurs pour répondre à l’exposition à la fumée ont inclus la confrontation verbale, des signes non verbaux, l’emploi d’une tierce personne et le retrait. Les conséquences perçues de ces actions, décrites par les fumeurs et non fumeurs, sont discutées; ainsi que l’implication pour les pratiques et politiques de lutte contre le tabac.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Elder J, Rosbrook B, Choi W, et al. Public objections to environmental tobacco smoke. Prev Med 1992;21(6):701–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gibson B. Smoker-nonsmoker conflict: Using a social psychological framework to understand current social controversy. J Social Issues 1997;53(1):97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gibson B. Psychological aspects of smoker-non-smoker interaction: Implications for public policy. American Psychologist 1994;49:1081–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leedom C, Persaud D, Shovein J. The effect on smoking behavior of an assertive request to refrain from smoking. Int J Addict 1986;21:1113–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis RM, Boyd GM, Schoenborn CA. ‘Common courtesy’ and the elimination of passive smoking. Results of the 1987 National Health Interview Survey. JAMA 1990;263(16):2208–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Willemsen MC, de Vries H. Saying “no” to environmental tobacco smoke: Determinants of assertiveness among nonsmoking employees. Prev Med 1996;25:575–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cardador T, Hazan AR, Glantz SA. Tobacco industry smokers’ rights publications: A content analysis. Am J Public Health 1995;85(9):1212–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. The secondhand smokescreen (advertisement). The New York Times, 1985(Tuesday, June 11).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    The Economist. Tobacco and tolerance: Blowing smoke. The Economist 1998(December 20).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poland B. Smoking, stigma, and the purification of public space. In: Kearns R, Gesler W (Eds.), Putting Health into Place: Making Connections in Geographical Research. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1998;208–25.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fischer B, Poland B. Exclusion, ‘risk’, and social control: Reflections on community policing and public health. GeoForum 1998;29(2):187–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Poland B. The ‘considerate’ smoker in public space: The micro-politics and political economy of ‘doing the right thing’, Health and Place forthcoming.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ashley MJ, Pederson L, Poland B, et al. Smoking, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Control and Programming: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study. Final Report, NHRDP Project No. 6606-6006-801, Toronto, ON, 1997.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ashley MJ, Cohen J, Ferrence R, et al. Smoking in the home: Changing attitudes and current practices. Am J Public Health 1998;88(5):797–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Northrup DA, Rhyne D. Smoking, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Control and Programming: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study. Technical Documentation Report. North York, ON: Insititute for Social Research, 1996.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Poland B, Stockton L. Qualitative Research on Lay Perceptions of Tobacco Control: The ‘Q&Q Study’ (Final Report). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto, 1997.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goffman E. Behavior in Public Places. New York: Macmillan, 1963.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Poland B, Taylor SM, Eyles J, White NF. Qualitative evaluation of the Brantford COMMIT intervention trial: The smokers’ perspective. Health and Canadian Society 1994;2(2):269–316.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ashley MJ, Cohen J, Bull S, et al. Knowledge about tobacco and attitudes toward tobacco control: How different are smokers and nonsmokers? Cancer Prevention & Control, in press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pederson L, Bull S, Ashley MJ, Lefcoe NM. A population survey on legislative measures to restrict smoking in Ontario: 2. Knowledge, attitudes, and predicted behaviour. Am J Prev Med 1986;2(6):316–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bull SB, Pederson LL, Ashley MJ. Restrictions on smoking: Growth in population support between 1983 and 1991 in Ontario, Canada. J Public Health Pol 1994;15:310–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Blake D. Poland
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Lisa Stockton
    • 3
  • Mary Jane Ashley
    • 1
    • 2
  • Linda Pederson
    • 4
  • Joanna Cohen
    • 2
  • Roberta Ferrence
    • 2
    • 5
  • Shelley Bull
    • 2
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Ontario Tobacco Research Unit, Centre for Health PromotionUniversity of TorontoCanada
  3. 3.Smaller World CommunicationsTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Department of Community Health and Preventive MedicineMoorehouse School of MedicineAtlantaCanada
  5. 5.Addiction Research Foundation DivisionCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthTorontoCanada
  6. 6.Samuel Lunenfeld Research InstituteMount Sinai HospitalTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations