Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 93, Issue 1, pp 36–40 | Cite as

The Affordability of a Nutritious Diet for Households on Welfare in Toronto

  • Nicholas Vozoris
  • Barbara Davis
  • Valerie Tarasuk
Article

Abstract

Objectives

This study assesses the affordability of a nutritious diet for households in Toronto that are supported by welfare.

Methods

For three hypothetical households, welfare incomes were compared to the monthly costs for food, shelter, and other essential expenditures in Toronto.

Results

If households lived in market rental accommodation, average monthly incomes were insufficient to cover expenses for the single-person household and two-parent family, and barely adequate for the single-parent family considered in this study. However, the single-parent family’s actual income fell below expenses for six months of the year. For households with children, the relative inadequacy of welfare increased as children grew older. Living in rent-geared-to-income housing afforded substantial financial advantage, but the welfare income of single-person households was still insufficient to meet basic needs.

Interpretation

These findings indicate discrepancies between welfare incomes and costs of basic needs, which may explain the vulnerability of welfare recipients to food insecurity.

Résumé

Objectifs

Notre étude porte sur l’abordabilité d’un régime alimentaire nutritif pour les ménages torontois vivant de l’aide sociale.

Méthode

Nous avons comparé les revenus d’aide sociale de trois ménages hypothétiques aux coûts mensuels de l’alimentation, du logement et d’autres biens essentiels à Toronto.

Résultats

Si ces ménages habitaient des logements locatifs non subventionnés, leurs revenus men-suels moyens étaient insuffisants pour couvrir les dépenses du ménage d’une personne et de la famille biparentale et couvraient tout juste les dépenses de la famille monoparentale (toutefois, six mois sur douze, le revenu réel de la famille monoparentale était inférieur à ses dépenses). Pour les ménages avec enfants, l’insuffisance relative de l’aide sociale augmentait avec l’âge des enfants. Le fait de payer un loyer proportionné au revenu procurait un avantage financier important, mais les prestations d’aide sociale du ménage d’une personne étaient encore insuffisantes pour répondre à ses besoins fondamentaux.

Interprétation

Ces résultats témoignent d’un écart entre les revenus de l’aide sociale et les coûts des besoins fondamentaux, ce qui expliquerait la propension des prestataires d’aide sociale à souf-frir d’insécurité alimentaire.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    National Council of Welfare. Welfare Incomes 1997 and 1998. Ottawa, ON: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Government of Ontario. Ontario Works — Information for Participants. Online: https://doi.org/www.gov.on.ca/CSS/page/brochure/owia.html. 2000.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hanvey L, Avard D, Graham I, et al.The Health of Canada’s Children: A CICH Profile, 2nd ed. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institute of Child Health, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Council of Welfare. Profiles of Welfare: Myths and Realities. Ottawa, ON: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    National Council of Welfare. Welfare Incomes 1995. Ottawa, ON: Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Council of Welfare. The Canada Assistance Plan: No Time for Cuts. Ottawa, ON: Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1991.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Council of Welfare. One Child, One Chance. Ottawa, ON: National Council of Welfare, 1973.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Social Planning Council of Metropolitan Toronto. Living on the Margin: Welfare Reform for the Next Decade. Toronto, ON: Social Planning Council of Metropolitan Toronto, 1986.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davis B, Tarasuk V. Hunger in Canada. Agriculture and Human Values 1994;11(4).50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McIntyre L, Connor SK, Warren J. Child hunger in Canada: Results of the 1994 National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. CMAJ 2000;163(8).961–65.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ontario Association of Food Banks. Preliminary Results: HungerCount 2000. Toronto, ON: Ontario Association of Food Banks, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Riches G. Hunger in Canada: Abandoning the right to food. In: Riches G (Ed.), First World Hunger, Food Security and Welfare Politics. London: Macmillan Press Ltd, 1997.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilson B. HungerCount 1999. Toronto, ON: Canadian Association of Food Banks, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dowler EA, Dobson BM. Nutrition and poverty in Europe: An overview. Proc Nutr Soc 1997;56:.51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dowler E, Leather S. ‘Spare some change for a bite to eat?’ From primary poverty to social exclusion: The role of nutrition and food. In: Bradshaw J, Sainsbury R (Eds.), Experiencing Poverty. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hanes FA, MacDonald A. ‘Can I afford the diet? 1988’. J Hum Nutr Dietet 1988;1:.389–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poppendieck J. The USA: Hunger in the land of plenty. In: Riches G (Ed.), First World Hunger, Food Security and Welfare Politics. London: Macmillan Press Ltd, 1997.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jacobs Starkey L, Kuhnlein H, Gray-Donald K. Food bank users: Sociodemographic and nutritional characteristics. CMAJ 1998;158(9).1143–49.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Struthers J. How much is enough? Creating a social minimum for Ontario, 1930–44. Canadian Historical Review 1991;LXXII(1):39–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Travers KD. The social organization of nutritional inequities. Soc Sci Med 1996;43(4).543–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Robbins LG, Robichon-Hunt L. The Agriculture Canada Nutritious Food Basket and the Thrifty Nutritious Food Basket, 1989. Food Market Commentary 1989;11(1).31–42.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sarlo C. Food. In: Poverty in Canada. Vancouver, BC: The Fraser Institute, 1992.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Travers KD, Cogdon A, McDonald W, Wright C, Anderson B, MacLean DR. Availability and cost of heart healthy dietary changes in Nova Scotia. J Can Diet Assoc 1997;58:.176–83.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Health Canada. A Revised National Nutritious Food Basket: Final Report. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada, Healthy Living Environment Directorate, Nutrition Programs Unit. 1997.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ontario Ministry of Health, Public Health Branch. Monitoring the Cost of a Nutritious Food Basket Protocol. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Health, 1998.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    National Council of Welfare. Poverty Profile 1997. Ottawa, ON: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 1999.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    City of Toronto Social Services Department. Basic Needs and Shelter Allowance Policy. Online: https://doi.org/www.city.toronto.on.ca/socialservices/Policy/BasicNeeds.htm. 2001.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Human Resources Development Canada. The Market Basket Measure — Constructing a New Measure of Poverty. Applied Res Bull 1998;158(9).1143–49.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Statistics Canada. Family Expenditure Survey 1996. Ottawa, ON: Ministry of Industry, 1998.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Basrur S. Cost of Healthy Eating in Toronto. Toronto, ON: Toronto Board of Health, 1999.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. Rental Market Report 1999 Toronto CMA. Toronto, ON: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, 1999.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sarlo C. Shelter and other necessities. In: Poverty in Canada, 2nd ed. Vancouver, BC: The Fraser Institute, 1996.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. RGI Handbook. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, 1999.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Statistics Canada. The Consumer Price Index, December 1999. Ottawa, ON: Ministry of Industry, 2000.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Emes J, Kreptul A. The Adequacy of Welfare Benefits in Canada. Online: https://doi.org/www.fraserinstitute.ca/publications/ The Fraser Institute, 1999.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Paquet B. Low Income Cut-Offs from 1990 to 1999 and Low Income Measures from 1989 to 1998. Online: https://doi.org/www.statcan.ca:80/english/research/75F0002M1E/75/F0002M1E00017.pdf. 2001.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Social Planning Council of Metropolitan Toronto. Updated Sample Family Budgets, 1994. Toronto, ON: Social Planning Council of Metropolitan Toronto, 1994.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kirkham J, Laframboise P. Obstacles and opportunities for London’s G.W.A. clients — Part 1. London, ON: Department of Social Services, Policy & Planning Division, 1993.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Planning for Today and Tomorrow — A Social Planning Council Report on the Kingston and Area Community. Kingston, ON: Kingston Social Planning Council, 1996.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Middlesex-London Health Unit. Nutrition matters — the price of eating well in London. London, ON: Nutrition Services, Middlesex-London Health Unit, 1993.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Peterborough County-City Health Unit. Nutrition matters — the price of eating well in Peterborough County and City. Peterborough, ON: Peterborough County-City Health Unit, 1999.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Peterborough Social Planning Council. The Peterborough Hunger Report. 1991.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Windsor-Essex County Food Security Steering Committee. Is There Food for All... in Windsor-Essex County? Technical Report. Windsor, ON: Windsor-Essex County Food Security Steering Committee, 1997.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Canadian Associations of Food Banks, B.B., Community Nutritionists Council of BC, and Dietitians of Canada. The Cost of Eating in BC. 2000.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nova Scotia Nutrition Council. How Do the Poor Afford to Eat? An Examination of Social Assistance Food Rates in Nova Scotia. Halifax, NS: Nova Scotia Nutrition Council, 1988.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Social Planning Council of Winnipeg and Winnipeg Harvest. A.L.L. Acceptable Living Level, Updated & Revised. Winnipeg, MB: Social Planning Council of Winnipeg, 2001.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Social Planning Council of Metropolitan Toronto. Guides for Family Budgeting, 1991. Toronto, ON: Social Planning Council of Metropolitan Toronto, 1992.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tarasuk V, Maclean H. The food problems of low-income single mothers: An ethnographic study. Can Home Econ J 1990;40(2).76–82.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tarasuk VS, Beaton GH. Household food insecurity and hunger among families using food banks. Can J Public Health 1999;90(2).109–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Vozoris
    • 1
  • Barbara Davis
    • 1
  • Valerie Tarasuk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations