Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 90, Issue 2, pp 114–119 | Cite as

Factors Influencing Infant Feeding Practices of Mothers in Vancouver

  • Patricia L. Williams
  • Sheila M. Innis
  • A. M. P. Vogel
  • Loraina J. Stephen
Article

Abstract

This study describes factors influencing infant feeding choices of 434 mothers with 9-month-old infants in Vancouver. Consistent with Social Cognitive Theory, both internal personal and socio-environmental factors influence infant feeding choices. Mothers attributed the choice to breastfeed primarily to personal choice, whereas the choice to formula feed was attributed to socio-environmental factors. Among mothers who breastfed <3 months, the choice to wean was primarily attributed to concern for baby’s nutrition; compared to returning to work, concern about milk supply and concern for baby’s nutrition among those who breastfed ≥3 to <6 months; and returning to work and personal choice among those who breastfed ≥6 months. Among Caucasian mothers, the choice to wean was primarily attributed to returning to work, compared to concern for baby’s nutrition among non-Caucasian mothers. Initiatives to facilitate further advances in breastfeeding promotion could address three areas: 1) prenatal intentions, 2) early postpartum concerns, and 3) later issues surrounding returning to work and infant nutrition.

Résumé

Cette étude décrit les facteurs influant sur les choix en matière d’alimentation faits par 434 mères de nourissons âgés de 9 mois. Conformément à la théorie cognitive sociale, des facteurs personnels et socio-environnementaux influent sur les choix en matière d’alimentation des nourissons. Les mères attribuent principalement le fait d’allaiter à un choix personnel tandis que l’alimentation au moyen de préparations est attribué à des facteurs socioenvironnementaux. La principale raison motivant le sevrage était le souci de l’alimentation du bébé, comparativement au retour au travail, chez les mères ayant allaité durant moins de 3 mois; le souci par rapport à la qualité du lait et l’alimentation du bébé chez celles ayant allaité pendant une période de 3 à 6 mois; et le retour au travail et un choix personnel parmi celles qui avaient allaité pendant 6 mois ou plus. Parmi les mères de race blanche, le retour au travail était la principale motivation comparativement au souci de l’alimentation du bébé chez les mères des autres races. Des initiatives visant à faciliter la promotion de l’allaitement au sein pourraient répondre aux trois questions suivantes: les intentions des mères avant l’accouchement, les problèmes survenant lors des premiers jours du post-partum et finalement les questions relatives au retour en milieu de travail et à l’alimentation des enfants.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tanaka PA, Yeung DL, Anderson, GH. Infant feeding practices: 1984–85 versus 1977–78. Can Med Assoc J 1987;136:940–44.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Health and Welfare Canada. Report on Present Patterns and Trends in Infant Feeding in Canada. Ottawa: Health & Welfare Canada, 1991.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McNally E, Hendricks S, Horowitz I. A look at breast-feeding trends in Canada (1963–1982). Can J Public Health 1985;76(2):101–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Myers, AW. A retrospective look at infant feeding practices in Canada: 1965–1978. J Can Diet Assoc 1979;40(3):200–10.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Williams PL, Innis SM, Vogel AMP. Breastfeeding and weaning practices in Vancouver. Can J Public Health 1996;87(4):231–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Health and Welfare Canada. Canada’s Health Promotion Surve. 1990. Technical Report. Ottawa: Minister of National Health and Welfare, 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Health and Welfare Canada. Breast-feeding support. Ottawa: Minister of National Health and Welfare, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    MacLean, HM. Breast-feeding in Canada: A demographic and experiential perspective. J Can Diet Assoc 1998;59(1):15–23.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Canadian Paediatric Society, Nutrition Committee. Meeting the iron needs of infants and young children: An update. Can Med Assoc J 1991;144(11):1451–54.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Canadian Pediatric Society, Nutrition Committee. Breast-feeding–Fifteen years of progress. Can J Public Health 1994;1:156–59.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Canadian Dietetic Association. Promoting Breast feeding: A role for the Dietitian/Nutritionist. Official Position of the Canadian Dietetic Association; 1989;50:211–14.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Breastfeeding Committee of Canada. Breastfeeding statement of the Breastfeeding Committee of Canada. J Can Diet Assoc 1998;59(1):11–13.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    WHO/UNICEF. Innocenti Declaration on the Protection, Promotion and Support of Breastfeeding. Breastfeeding in the 1990’s: Global Initiative WHO/UNICEF sponsored meeting, Florence, Italy. 1991.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ryan AS, Pratt WF, Wysong JL, et al. A comparison of breast-feeding data from the National surveys of family growth and the Ross Laboratories Mothers’ Survey. Am J Public Health 1991;81(8):1049–52.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sacks SH, Brada M, Hill AM, et al. To breast feed or not to breast feed. Practitioner 1976;216:183–91.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ever-Hodani P, Seidman DS, Manor O, Harlop S. Breast feeding in Israel: Maternal factors associated with choice and duration. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1994;48:281–85.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bloom K, Goldbloom RB, Robinson SC, Stevens, FE. Factors affecting the continuance of breastfeeding. Acta Paediatr Scan (Supp.) 1982;300:9–14.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    LeFevre M, Kruse J, Zweig S. Selection of infant feeding method: A population-based study in a rural area. J Fam Pract 1987;24:487–91.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rousseau EH, Lescop JN, Fontaine S, et al. Influence of cultural and environmental factors on breast-feeding. CMAJ 1982;127:701–4.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Entwisle DR, Doering SG, Reilly, TW. Sociopsychological determinants of women’s breast-feeding behaviour: A replication and extension. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1982;52:244–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Losch M, Dungy C, Russell D, Dusdieker, LB. Impact of attitudes on maternal decision regarding infant feeding. J Pediatr 1995;126:507–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kearney, MH. Identifying psychosocial obstacles to breast-feeding success. JOGNN 1988; March/April: 98–105.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Innis SM, Nelson CM, Wadsworth LD, et al. Incidence of iron-deficiency anaemia and depleted iron stores among nine-month-old infants in Vancouver, Canada. Can J Public Health 1997;88(2):80–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Neumark-Sztauber D, Story M. The use of health behaviour theory in nutrition counselling. Top Clin Nutr 1996;11:60–73.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bloom K, Goldbloom RB, Stevens, FE. Breast, vs. formula feeding: I. Factors affecting the mother’s choice of infant feeding method. Acta Paed Scand Suppl 1982;300:3.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Haider, SA. Encouragement of breast-feeding. (Letter) BMJ 1976;1:650.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wright W, Walker P. Prediction of duration of breast-feeding in primiparas. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1983;37:89–94.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lawrence, RA. Practices and attitudes toward breast-feeding among medical professionals. Pediatrics 1982;70:912–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bernard-Bonnin AC, Stachenko S, Girard G, Rousseau E. Hospital practices and breast-feeding duration: A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Birth 1989;16:64–66.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reif MI, Essock-Vitale, SM. Hospital influences on early infant-feeding practices. Pediatrics 1985;76:872–79.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Labbok MH, Simon, SR. A community study of a decade of in-hospital breast-feeding: Implications for breast-feeding promotions. Am J Prev Med 1988;42(2):62–67.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Green LW, Kreuter, MW. Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Environmental Approach 2nd, Ed. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 1991.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    World Health Organization. International code of marketing of breast milk substitutes. 1981; Resolution WHO, 34:22.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nutrition Committee of the Canadian Paediatric Society and the Committee on Nutrition for the American Academy of Paediatrics. Breast-feeding: A commentary in celebration of the International Year of the Child. 1979. Pediatrics 1978;62:591–601.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Myers, AW. National initiatives to promote breast-feeding: Canada, 1979–85. In: Jelliffe DB, Jelliffe EFP (Eds.), Programs to Promote Breastfeeding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nutrition Committee, Canadian Pediatric Society. Breast-feeding: What is left besides the poetry? Can J Public Health 1978;69:13–20.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Freil JK, Hudson NI, Banoub S, Ross A. The effect of a promotion campaign on attitudes of adolescent females toward breast-feeding. Can J Public Health 1989;80:195–99.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Myers, AW. The national breast-feeding promotion program. 2. Public information phase - a note on its development, distribution and impact. Can J Public Health 1983;74:404–8.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Katcher AL, Lonese, MG. Breast-feeding by employed mothers: A reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Pediatrics 1985;73:644–47.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Barber-Madden R, Petschek MA, Parker J. Breast-feeding and the working mother: Barriers and intervention strategies. J Public Health Pol 1987;Winter:531–41.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jones D, West R. Effect of a lactation nurse on the success of breast-feeding: A randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1986;40:45–49.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lynch S, Koch A, Hislop T, Coldman A. Evaluating the effect of a breast-feeding consultant on the duration of breast-feeding. Can J Public Health 1986;77(3):190–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Morse JM, Bottorff J, Boman J. Patterns of breast-feeding and work: The Canadian experience. Can J Public Health 1989;80:182–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Freed GL, Jones TM, Schandler, RJ. Prenatal determination of demographic and attitudinal factors regarding feeding practice in an indigent population. Am J Perinatal 1992;9:420–24.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Eastham E, Smith D, Poole D, Neligan G. Further decline of breast-feeding. BMJ 1976;1:305–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schwartz C, Evers S. Infant feeding practices in low-income communities in Ontario. J Can Diet Assoc 1998;59(1):30–34.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Aberman S, Kirchoff, KT. Infant-feeding practices, mothers’ decision making. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1985;14:394–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jones RAD, Belsey, EM. Breast-feeding in an inner London borough: A study of cultural factors. Soc Sci Med 1977;11:175–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mackey S, Fried, PA. Infant breast and bottlefeeding practices: Some related factors and attitudes. Can J Public Health 1981;72:312–18.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sarett HP, Bain KR, O’Leary, JC. Decision on breast-feeding or formula feeding and trends in infant-feeding practices. Am J Dis Child 1983;137:719–25.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sjolin S, Hofvander Y, Hillervik C. A prospective study of individual courses of breast-feeding. Acta Paediatr Scand 1979;68:521–29.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Beske EJ, Garvis M. Important factors in breastfeeding success. Am J Maternal Child Nursing 1982;7:174–79.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Coreil J, Murphy, JE. Maternal commitment, lactation practices and breast-feeding duration. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1988;17:237–78.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Burglehaus MJ, Smith LA, Sheps SB, Green, LW. Physicans and breastfeeding: Beliefs, knowledge, self-efficacy and counselling practices. Can J Public Health 1997;88(6):383–87.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia L. Williams
    • 1
  • Sheila M. Innis
    • 1
  • A. M. P. Vogel
    • 2
  • Loraina J. Stephen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PaediatricsUniversity of British Columbia, B.C. Research Institute for Child and Family HealthVancouverCanada
  2. 2.City of Vancouver Health DepartmentVancouverCanada
  3. 3.School of Family and Nutritional SciencesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations