Advances in Atmospheric Sciences

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 692–700 | Cite as

The Relationship between the Meridional Profile of Zonal-mean Geostrophic Wind and Station Wave at 500 hPa

  • Fang Zhifang
  • John M. Wallace
  • David W. J. Thompson


The sea-level pressure (SLP), 500 hPa height, zonal-mean 500 hPa height ([Z500]), stationary wave eddy component of the 500 hPa height (Z*500) and zonal-mean 500 hPa geostrophic wind [Ug] fields poleward of 20°N are examined for the period 1958–1997, with emphasis on the winter season. The relationships between the Arctic Oscillation (AO)index and algebraic difference of the zonal-mean wind in 55°N and 35°N (Ut) index were investigated, making use the Monte Carlo procedure, Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), Empirical orthogonal function (EOF) and regression method. The leading modes of empirical orthogonal function (EOF's) ofSLP are more robust than the 500 hPa height EOF's, not only in the ratio of the two largest eigenvalues, but in more zonally symmetric. Comparing the meridional profiles of zonal-mean wind amplitude associated with the AO and Ut index, the profiles for the two indexes are very similar, both with respect to amplitude and the placement of the maximum and minimum. Comparing the station wave component of 500 hPa height field regressed upon the AO and Ut index, there is one-to-one correspondence between all the major centers of action in the two maps, especially in the North Atlantic and Eurasian continent. The pattern is unlike the prominent teleconnection patterns, they have hemispheric extent and cannot be interpreted in term of the individual wavetrains.

Key words

Meridional profile Station wave Eddy component Zonal-mean geostrophic wind Arctic Oscillation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Branstator, G.W., 1984: The relationship between the zonal-mean flow and quasi-stationary waves in the mid troposphere. J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 2163–2178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnston, A., and R.E. Livezey, 1987: Classification, seasonality and persistence of low-frequency circulation patterns. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 1083–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheng, X., G. Nitsche, and J.M. Wallace, 1995: Robustness of low-frequency circulation pattern derived from EOF and rotated EOF analyses. J. Climatol., 8, 1709–1713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kidson, J. W., 1985: Index cycles in the Northern Hemisphere during the Global Weather Experiment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 113, 607–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ting, M., M.P. Hoerling, T. Xu, and A. Kumara, 1996: Northern Hemisphere teleconnection patterns during extreme phases of the zonal-mean circulation. J. Climate, 9, 2615–2633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Thompson D. W. J., and J.M. Wallace, 1998: The Arctic oscillation signature in wintertime geopotential height and temperature fields. Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1297–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Thompson D. W. J., and J.M. Wallace, 2000: Annular modes in the extratropical circulation. Part 1: month-to-month variability. J. Climate, 13, 1000–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Wallace, J. M., and D. S. Gutzler, 1981: Teleconnections in the geopotential height field during Northern Hemisphere winter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 109, 784–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fang Zhifang
    • 1
  • John M. Wallace
    • 2
  • David W. J. Thompson
    • 2
  1. 1.Chengdu University of Information TechnologyChengduChina
  2. 2.Department of Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations