Advertisement

Interceram - International Ceramic Review

, Volume 64, Issue 8, pp 346–356 | Cite as

Effect of Thermal-cured Hydraulic Cement Admixtures on the Mechanical Properties of Concrete

Building Materials

Abstract

In the cement industry, researchers have worked on blending cement with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) to enhance the mechanical properties of concrete. For technical and environmental reasons, previous studies have recommended that concretes be designed with less ordinary Portland cement (OPC). Other researchers encourage the use of thermal treatments at the precast stage. In this work, high volumes of various SCMs other than OPC were used to prepare five cement formulations, including a control sample. Initial tests of three hydraulic binders were performed to check their suitability before mixing cement samples. The samples were treated in water, air, hot water, and hot air curing (HAC) conditions after demoulding. The study showed that a combination of rice husk ash (RHA) and fly ash (FA) with OPC in the binder matrix, cured under HAC conditions, gave the best compressive and flexural strength results with the lowest water absorption.

Keywords

pozzolanic material supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) thermal cement treatment concrete mechanical properties 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    US Geological Survey: Cement statistics and information, in: Mineral Commodity Summaries. US Geological Survey, US Department of the interior, Reston, (2014) 44–46 p. Available from: http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/cement/index.html (accessed 09.03.15)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Aldea, C.M., Young, F., Wang, K., Shah, S.P.: Effects of curing conditions on properties of concrete using slag replacement. Cem. Concr. Res. 30 (2000) [3] 465–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bagel, L.: Strength and pore structure of ternary blended cement mortars containing blast furnace slag and silica fume. Cem. Concr. Res. 28 (1998) [7] 1011–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Dongxue, L., Xinhua, F., Xuequan, W., Mingshu, T.: Durability study of steel slag cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 27 (1997) [7] 983–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Escalante-Garcia, J.I., Sharp, J.H.: The microstructure and mechanical properties of blended cements hydrated at various temperatures. Cem. Concr. Res. 31 (2001) [5] 695–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Agarwal, S.K.: Pozzolanic activity of various siliceous materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 36 (2006) 1735–1739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Varga, I., Castro, J., Bentz, D., Weiss, J.: Application of internal curing for mixtures containing high volumes of fly ash. Cem. Concr. Comp. 34 (2012) 1001–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Boubitsas, D.: Replacement of cement by limestone filler or ground granulated blast furnace slag: the effect of chloride penetration in cement mortars. Nord. Concr. Res. 45 (2001) [36] 65–77Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Siddique, R.: Properties of self-compacting concrete containing Class F fly ash. Mater. Design. 32 (2001) 1501–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Sajedi, F., Abdul Razak, H.: The effect of chemical activators on early strength of ordinary Portland cement-slag mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 24 (2010a) 1944–1951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Ezziane, K., Bougara, A., Kadri, A., Khelafi, H., Kadri, E.: Compressive strength of mortar containing natural pozzolan under various curing temperature. Cem. Concr. Comp. 29 (2007) 587–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Kim, J.K., Han, S.H., Chul, S.Y.: Effect of temperature and aging on the mechanical properties of concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 32 (2002) 1087–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Stepehen, O.E.: Role of heat curing in concrete durability. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (2004)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Herrera, A.D., Juarez, C.A., Valdez, P., Bentz, D.P.: Evaluation of sustainable high volume fly ash concrete. Cem. Concr. Comp. 33 (2011) 39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Hasparyk, N.P., Monteiro, P.J.M., Carasek, H.: Effect of silica fume and rice husk ash on alkali-silika reaction. ACI Mater. 97 (2000) [4] 486–492Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Sajedi, F., Abdul Razak, H.: Effects of thermal and mechanical activation methods on compressive strength of ordinary Portland cement-slag mortar. Mater. Design. 32 (2011b) [2] 984–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    ASTM C109/C109M: Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2-in. or [50-mm] cube specimens). Amer. Soc. for Testing and Materials, PA (2008)Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Carino, N.J.: The maturity method: theory and application. ASTM J. Cem. Concr. Aggregates 6 (1984) 61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Sivakumar, G., Mohanraj, K., Barathan, S.: Dielectric study on fly ash blended cement. E-J. Chem. 6 (2009) [1] 231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Halaweh, M.A.: Effect of alkalis and sulfates on Portland cement systems. Ph.D. Thesis, University of South Florida, FL, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  21. [25]
    ASTM C128: Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of fine aggregate. Amer. Soc. for Testing and Materials, PA (2015)Google Scholar
  22. [23]
    Bakhshi, M., Mobasher, B.: Experimental observations of early-age drying of Portland cement paste under low-pressure conditions. Cem. Concr. Comp. 33 (2011) [4] 474–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [24]
    ISO 9277: Determination of the specific surface area of solids by gas adsorption — BET method. Technical Committee ISO/TC 24, Geneva (2010)Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Ben, H.M., Lothenbach, B., Le Saout, G., Winnefeld, F.: Influence of slag chemistry on the hydration of alkali-activated blast-furnace slag-Part 1: Effect of MgO. Cem. Concr. Res. 41 (2011) 955–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Kocaba, V.: Development and evaluation of methods to follow microstructural development of cementitious systems including slags. Ph.D. Thesis, École Politechnique Fedérale de Lausanne Materials Department, Lausanne, Switzerland (2009)Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    ASTM D6683: Standard test method for measuring bulk density values of powders and other bulk solids as function of compressive stress. Amer. Soc. for Testing and Materials, PA (2014)Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Bentz, D.P., Garboczi, E.J., Haecker, C.J., Jensen, O.M.: Effects of cement particle size distribution on performance properties of cement-based materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 29 (1999) [10] 1663–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Higginson, E.C.: The effect of cement fineness on concrete, in: Verbeck, G.J. (Eds.), Fineness of cement, ASTM STP 473. Amer. Soc. for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, USA (1970) 71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Nazari, A., Bagheri, A., Riahi, S.: Properties of geopolymer with seeded fly ash and rice husk bark ash. Mater. Sci. Eng. A528 (2011) [24] 7395–7401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    ASTM C430: Standard test method for fitness of hydraulic cement by the 5-mm (no. 325) sieve. Amer. Soc. for Testing and Materials, PA (2003)Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    ASTM C494: Standard specification for chemical admixtures for concrete. Amer. Soc. for Testing and Materials, PA, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Gardner, N.J.: The Effect of superplasticizers and fly ash on formwork pressures, third ed. Forming Economical Concrete Buildings, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, USA (1982) 1–12Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    ASTM D1429: Standard test method for specific gravity of water and brine. Amer. Soc. for Testing and Materials, PA, USA (2013)Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Jumate, E., Manea, D.L.: X-Ray diffraction study of hydration processes in the Portland cement. Civil. Eng. Install. 14 (2011) 79–86Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Stutzman, P.: Scanning electron microscopy imaging of hydraulic cement microstructure. Cem. Concr. Comp. 26 (2004) [8] 957–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Pavia, D.L., Lampman, G.M., Kriz, G.S., Vyvyan, J.R.: Introduction to Spectroscopy (4 ed.). Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning, Belmont, CA, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Thiruppathi, K., Barathan, S., Anandhan, N., Sivakumar, G.: Effect of fly ash and water in hydrated Srpc-A Ftir study. Appl. Phys. Res. 1 (2009) [2] 59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Meiszterics, A., Sinko, K.: Sol-Gel Derived Calcium Silicate Ceramics. Colloids. Surf. A319 (2008) [1–3] 143–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Pandey, S.P., Sharma, R.L.: The influence of mineral additives on the strength and porosity of OPC mortar. Cem. Concr. Res. 30 (2000) [1] 19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Khan, M.I.: Iso-responses for strength, permeability and porosity of high performance mortar. Build. Environ. 38 (2003) [8] 1051–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Malami, C.H., Kaloidas, V.: Carbonation and porosity of mortar specimens with pozzolanic and hydraulic cement admixtures. Cem. Concr. Res. 24 (2003) [8] 1444–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Chindaprasirt, P., Rukzon, S.: Strength, porosity and corrosion resistance of ternary blend Portland cement, rice husk ash and fly ash mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 22 (2008) [8] 1601–1606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Ahmari, S., Ren, X., Toufigh, V., Zhang, L.: Production of geopolymeric binder from blended waste concrete powder and fly ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 35 (2012) 718–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Castaldelli, V.N., Akasaki, J.L., Melges, J.L.P., Tashima, M.M., Soriano, L., Borrachero, M., Monzo, J., Paya, J.: Use of Slag/Sugar Cane Bagasse Ash (SCBA) Blends in the Production of Alkali-Activated Materials. Mater. 6 (2013) 3108–3127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    Karim, M.R., Hossain, M.M., Khan, M.N.M., Zain, M.F.M., Jamil, M., Lai, F.C.: On the Utilization of Pozzolanic Wastes as an Alternative Resource of Cement. Mater. 7 (2014) 7809–7827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    Li, X., Wang, Z., Jiao, Z.: Influence of curing on the strength development of calcium-containing geopolymer mortar. Mater. 6 (2013) 5069–5076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    ASTM C465: Standard specification for processing additions for use in the manufacture of hydraulic cements, in: Annual Book of ASTM Standards (Vol. 04.01). Amer. Soc. for Testing and Materials, PA, USA (1998)Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    Beitzel, H.: Effect of the mixing time on the quality of the mixing. Precast. Concrete. 12 (1981) [9] 403–408Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    Vidick, B., Schlumberger, D.: Critical mixing parameters for good control of cement slurry quality. J. Pet. Technol. 42 (1990) [7] 924–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    Khaleel, O.R., Abdul Razak, H.: Mix design method for self compacting metakaolin concrete with different properties of coarse aggregate. Mater. Design. 53 (2014) 691–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    Thankachan, V., Philip, N.: High performance concrete-A state of the art study. Trans. Eng. Sci. 2 (2014) [6] 60–65Google Scholar
  52. [52]
    Sua-Iam, G., Makul, N.: Self-compacting concrete incorporating various ratios of husk ash in Portland cement. CMU. J. Nat. Sci. 12 (2013) [2] 111Google Scholar
  53. [53]
    Sajedi, F., Abdul Razak, H.: Comparison of different methods for activation of ordinary Portland cement-slag mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 25 (2011c) [1] 30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    BS EN 12390-3: Testing for hardened concrete, compressive strength of test specimens. British Standard European Norm, London, UK (2009)Google Scholar
  55. [55]
    ASTM C293/C293M: Standard Test Method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam with center-point loading). Amer. Soc. for Testing and Materials, PA, USA (2010)Google Scholar
  56. [56]
    Zhang, S.P., Zong, L.: Evaluation of relationship between water absorption and durability of concrete materials. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2014 (2014) 8Google Scholar
  57. [57]
    ASTM C1585: Standard Test Method for measurement of rate of absorption of water by hydraulic-cement concretes. Amer. Soc. for Testing and Materials, PA, USA (2010)Google Scholar
  58. [58]
    RILEM-TC/14-CPC: CPC 11.3 Absorption of water by immersion under vacuum. Mater. Struct. 17 (1984) [101] 391–394Google Scholar
  59. [59]
    Anthiohos, S.K., Papadakis, V.G., Tsimas, S.: Rice husk ash (RHA) effectiveness in cement and concrete as a function of reactive silica and fineness. Cem. Concr. Res. 61 (2014) [62] 20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    Schmidt, M., Fehling, E., Glotzbach, C., Fröhlich, S., Piotrowski, S.: Ultra-high performance concrete and nanotechnology in construction. Proceedings of Hipermat, 3rd International Symposium on UHPC and Nanotechnology for High Performance Construction Materials, Kassel University, Kassel, Denmark (2010)Google Scholar
  61. [61]
    Peter, L., Jose, M.C., Luiz, O.L., Gaspar, C.P.: Using converter dust to produce low cost cementitious composites by in situ carbon nanotube and nanofiber synthesis. Mater. 4 (2011) 575–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    Ranjbar, M.M., Madandoust, R., Mousavi, S.Y., Yosefi, S.: Effects of natural zeolite on the fresh and hardened properties of self-compacted concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 47 (2013) 806–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. [63]
    CEB-FIP: Diagnosis and assessment of concrete structures — state of the art report. CEB. Bull. 192 (1989) 83–85Google Scholar
  64. [63]
    CEB-FIP: Diagnosis and assessment of concrete structures — state of the art report. CEB. Bull. 192 (1989) 83–85Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of DentistryUniversity of DamascusDamascusSyria

Personalised recommendations