Advertisement

Interceram - International Ceramic Review

, Volume 63, Issue 6, pp 281–285 | Cite as

Benefit of Matrix Alumina and Modern Dispersing Systems in Low Cement Castables

  • M. Schnabel
  • A. Buhr
  • R. Kockegey-Lorenz
  • D. Schmidtmeier
  • J. Dutton
Review Papers

Abstract

The use of monolithic refractories has spread throughout various industries over the past few decades. Today it is common practice to install monolithics in heavy wear areas. In the past, only refractory bricks were used. Unlike bricks, unshaped products require sintering during operational use to obtain their final properties. Applications outside the iron and steel industry are often referred to as “industrial applications”. Industrial applications also demand improved castable properties such as better chemical stability, mechanical strength and abrasion resistance in intermediate temperature ranges. The service temperatures in industrial applications are often below 1200°C, so castables do not attain sufficient energy for strong sintering reactions. Matrix properties are important for refractory castables. They determine not only workability and strength, but also performance within an application. By optimising the overall particle size distribution of fine and superfine materials including the binder, better workability can be achieved. In addition, the physical properties of castables can be improved, especially in intermediate temperature ranges. Calcined and reactive aluminas and dispersing additives can also contribute significantly to the improvement of matrix performance with respect to water demand, setting control and strength development.

Keywords

reactive alumina dispersing alumina low cement castables matrix 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Amthauer, K., et al.: New European sinter aggregate with 96% Al2O3. 54. Internat. Colloquium on Refractories, Aachen, Germany (2011)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Laurich, J.O., Buhr, A.: Synthetic Alumina Raw Materials — Key Elements for Refractory Innovations. Unitecr’99 Congress, Berlin, Germany, Proc. (1999) 348–355Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Liu, X. et al.: Upgrading Castable Performance through Matrix Optimization. Austceram, Perth, Australia (2002)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Büchel, G., et al.: E-SY 1000 and E-SY 2000 — new reactive aluminas for easy workability of castables, Iv. Internat. Scientific Conference Refractories, April 24–26, 2006, Kosice, SlovakiaGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Kockegey-Lorenz, R. et al.: E-SY Aluminas for Easy to Use High Performance Castables, 53. Internat. Colloquium on Refractories, Aachen, Germany, (2009) (86-88)Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Van Garsel, D. et al.: New Developments of the Improved Durability of Alumina Based Castables, IRE Colloquium, Johannesburg, South Africa, July, 1997Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Krebs, R.: Innovationen bei verflüssigten Feuerbetonen, Refractory and chimney congress 2003 of GARC (German Association of Refractories and Chimneys); Düsseldorf/Germany, June 16, 2003Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Schnabel
    • 1
  • A. Buhr
    • 1
  • R. Kockegey-Lorenz
    • 2
  • D. Schmidtmeier
    • 2
  • J. Dutton
    • 3
  1. 1.Almatis GmbHFrankfurt/MainGermany
  2. 2.Almatis GmbHLudwigshafenGermany
  3. 3.StourbridgeUK

Personalised recommendations