Schmalenbach Business Review

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 238–260 | Cite as

R&D Spillovers, Technological Proximity, and Productivity Growth — Evidence from German Panel Data

  • Dietmar Harhoff


This paper studies the effect of R&D spillovers on R&D spending and productivity in a sample of German manufacturing firms. Using panel estimation techniques, the results suggest that spillovers affect industries in a heterogeneous manner. In terms of R&D investment, firms in high-technology sectors appear to react positively and more strongly to spillovers than firms in other industries. Experiments with alternative spillover definitions suggest that the effect is not due to racing phenomena. Moreover, in high-technology industries spillovers have a productivity-enhancing effect in addition to encouraging R&D investment. The effect is conditioned by the firm’s own R&D activity. Consistent with the hypothesis of absorptive capacity, high R&D capital stocks appear to enable firms to profit from external R&D.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, T. J. (1977), Managing the Flow of Technology.Google Scholar
  2. Arellano, M./Bond, S. (1992), “Female Labour Supply and On-the-Job Search: An Empirical Model Using Complementary Data Sets”, in: Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 59, pp. 537–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audretsch, D. B./Feldman, M. P. (1996), “The geography of innovation and knowledge spillovers”, Paper Presented at the TSER Conference on Innovation, R&D and Productivity, Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  4. Battacharya, S./Ritter, J. R. (1983), “Innovation and Communication: Signalling with Partial Disclosure”, in: Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 50, pp. 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernstein, J. I. (1988), “Costs of Production, Intra- and Interindustry Spillovers: Canadian Evidence”, in: Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 21, pp. 324–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernstein, J. I./Nadiri, M. I. (1989), “Research and Development and Intraindustry Spillovers: An Empirical Application of Dynamic Duality”, in: Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 56, pp. 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bound, J./Cummins, C./Griliches, Z./Hall, B. H./Jaffe, A. (1984), “Who Does R&D and Who Patents?”, in: Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity, pp. 21–88.Google Scholar
  8. Boyens, C. (1998), Externe Verwertung von technologischem Wissen.Google Scholar
  9. Brockhoff, K. (1999), Forschung und Entwicklung — Planung und Kontrolle.Google Scholar
  10. Choi, J. P. (1991), “Dynamic R&D Competition Under ‘Hazard Rate’ Uncertainty”, in: RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 22(4), pp. 596–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cockburn, I./Henderson, R. (1994), “Racing to invest? The dynamics of competition in ethical drug discovery”, in: Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 3, pp. 481–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coe, D. T./Helpman, E. (1995), International R&D Spillovers”, in: European Economic Review, Vol. 39(5), pp. 859–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, W. M./Levinthal, D. A. (1990), “The Implications of Spillovers for R&D Investment and Welfare: A New Perspective”, in: Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 35, pp. 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, W. M./Levinthal, D. (1989), “Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D”, in: Economic Journal, Vol. 99, pp. 569–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, W. M./Klepper, S. (1992), “The Anatomy of Industry R&D Distributions”, in: American Economic Review, Vol. 82, No. 4. pp. 773–799.Google Scholar
  16. Crepon, B./Duguet, E. (1993), “Research and Development, Competition and Innovation: An Application of the Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods to Poisson Models with Heterogeneity”, Paper Presented at the NBER Productivity Group Summer Session.Google Scholar
  17. Cuneo, P./Mairesse, J. (1984), “Productivity and R&D at the Firm Level in French Manufacturing”, in: Griliches, Z. (Ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity, pp. 375–392.Google Scholar
  18. d’Aspremont, C./Jacquemin, A. (1988), “Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers”, in: American Economic Review, Vol. 78, pp. 1133–1137.Google Scholar
  19. Dasgupta, P./Maskin, E. (1987), “The Simple Economics of Research Portfolios”, in: Economic Journal, Vol. 97, pp. 581–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dasgupta, P./Stiglitz, J. (1980), “Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity”, in: Economic Journal, Vol. 90, pp. 266–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De-Fraja, G. (1993), “Strategic Spillovers in Patent Races”, in: International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 11(1), pp. 139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dixit, A. (1988), “A General Model of R&D Competition and Policy”, in: RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 19(3), pp. 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goto, A./Suzuki, K. (1989), “R&D Capital, Rate of Return on R&D Investment and Spillover of R&D in Japanese Manufacturing Industries”, in: Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 71(4), pp. 555–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griliches, Z. (1979), “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth”, in: Bell Journal of Economics. Vol. 10, pp. 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Griliches, Z. (1994), “The Search for R&D Spillovers”, in: Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol 94 (Supplement), pp. 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Griliches, Z./Mairesse, J. (1984), “Productivity and R&D at the Firm Level”, in: Griliches, Z. (Ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity, pp. 339–374.Google Scholar
  27. Grossman, G./Shapiro, C. (1987), “Dynamic R&D Competition”, in: Economic Journal, Vol. 97, pp. 372–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hall, B. (1993), “Industrial R&D During the 1980s: Did the Rate of Return Fall?”, in: Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 2, pp. 289–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall, B./Mairesse, J. (1995), “Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms”, in: Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 65, pp. 263–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hall, B. H. (1992), “Investment and Research and Development at the Firm Level: Does the Source of Financing Matter?”, NBER Discussion Paper No. 4096.Google Scholar
  31. Harhoff, D. (1996), “Strategic Spillovers and Incentives for Research and Development”, in: Management Science, Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 907–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harhoff, D. (1998), “R&D and Productivity in German Manufacturing Firms”, in: Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 6, S. 29–49, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harris, C./Vickers, J. (1987), “Racing with Uncertainty”, in: Review of Ecomic Studies, Vol. 54, pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Henriques, I. (1990), “Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers: Comment”, in: American Economic Review, Vol. 80, pp. 638–640.Google Scholar
  35. Jaffe, A. B. (1986), “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firm’s Patents, Profits and Market Value”, in: American Economic Review, Vol. 76(5), pp. 984–1001.Google Scholar
  36. Jaffe, A. B. (1988), “Demand and Supply Influences in R&D Intensity and Productivity Growth”, in: Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 70(3), pp. 431–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Katsoulacos, Y./Ulph, D. (1995), “Information Revelation, R&D Cooperation and Technology Policy”, Paper presented at the CEPR Workshop on R&D Spillovers, Lausanne, Jan. 27/28 1995.Google Scholar
  38. Klepper, S. (1996), “Innovation over the Product Life Cycle”, in: American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 562–583.Google Scholar
  39. Klette, T. J. (1994), “R&D, Spillovers and Performance among Heterogeneous Firms — An Empirical Study Using Microdata”, Discussion Paper No. 133, Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
  40. Leahy, D./Neary, J. P. (1995), “Public Policies towards R&D in Oligopolistic Industries”, Paper presented at the CEPR Workshop on R&D Spillovers, Lausanne, Jan. 27/28 1995.Google Scholar
  41. Legler, H./Grupp, H./Gehrke, B./Schasse, U. (1992), Innovationspotential und Hochtechnologie — Technologische Position Deutschlands im internationalen Wettbewerb.Google Scholar
  42. Levin, R. C./Reiss, P. (1988), “Cost-Reducing and Demand-Creating R&D With Spillovers”, in: Rand Journal of Economics, Vol 19(4), pp. 538–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mairesse, J. (1995), “R&D Productivity: A Survey of the Econometric Literature”, Paper presented at the CEPR Workshop on R&D Spillovers, Lausanne, Jan. 27/28 1995.Google Scholar
  44. Mairesse, J./Hall, B. (1994), “Comparing the Productivity of Research and Development in French and United States Manufacturing Firms”, Paper prepared for the Conference on R&D, Innovation and Productivity at the Firm Level, ZEW Mannheim, May 1994.Google Scholar
  45. Mansfield, E. (1985), “How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?”, in: Journal of Industrial Economics. Vol. 34, pp. 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reinganum, J. (1989), “The Timing of Innovation: Research, Development, and Diffusion”, in: Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R. D. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1, pp. 849–908.Google Scholar
  47. Scotchmer, S./Green, J. (1990), “Novelty and Disclosure in Patent Law”. in: RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 21, pp. 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Spence, A. M. (1984), “Cost reduction, competition and industry performance”, in: Econometrica, Vol. 52, pp. 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sutton, J. (1998, forthcoming), Technology and Market Structure.Google Scholar
  50. Suzumura, K. (1992), “Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in an Oligopoly with Spillovers”, in: American Economic Review, Vol. 82(5), pp. 1307–1320.Google Scholar
  51. Tirole, J. (1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft für Betriebswirtschaft e.V. (SG) 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Innovation Research and Technology ManagementLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations