The Psychological Record

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 283–297 | Cite as

Reinforcement Concordance Induces and Maintains Stimulus Associations in Pigeons

  • Juan D. Delius
  • Manuela Ameling
  • Stephen E. G. Lea
  • J. E. R. Staddon


In a first experiment. pigeons were trained to discriminate two pairs of simultaneously presented stimuli. A+ C− and B+ D−. Both pairs were successively and repeatedly presented in every session. After the birds learned the two discriminations, both tasks were synchronously reversed (i.e., A− C+ and B− D+) several times. When reversal performance had stabilized, test reversal sessions were run in which one discrimination (the “leader” task, e.g., A+ C−) was presented for several trials before the second one (the “trailer” task, e.g., B+ C−) was introduced. The animals acquired the trailing task somewhat faster than the leading task, suggesting that associations A ↔ B and C ↔ D that had built up between the stimuli forming the two discrimination pairs were supporting a reversal transfer. A second experiment showed that further reversal experience with a discrimination where the constituent stimuli were presented compounded (AB+Cd− or Ab−Cd+) as well as singly, enhanced the transfer between leading and trailing tasks in subsequent test sessions. A third experiment showed that the same pigeons learned half reversals involving only one discrimination (for example by switching from A+ B−, C+ D− to A− B+, C+ D−) more slowly than full reversals involving both discriminations. These results support the hypothesis that pigeons can associate stimuli that have concordant reinforcement histories. When a reinforcement allocation change causes a change in responding to one stimulus of such an association, pigeons tend to generalize that response change to the other stimulus.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AMELING, M. (1987). Gruppenzugehörigkeit von visuellen Reizen als Diskriminationsgrundlage bei Tauben (Group-belongingness of stimuli as a discriminative basis in pigeons). Diplom thesis, Bochum University.Google Scholar
  2. BATESON, P. P. G., & CHANTREY, D. R (1972). Retardation of discrimination learning in monkeys and chicks previously exposed to both stimuli. Nature, 237, 173–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. BEALE, I. L. (1970). The effects of amount of training per reversal on successive reversals of a color discrimination. The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 14, 345–352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. BHATT, R. S., & WASSERMAN E. A. (1989). Secondary generalization and categorization in pigeons. The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 213–224.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. CHANNEL, S., & HALL, G. (1981). Facilitation and retardation of discrimination learning after exposure to the stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 437–446.Google Scholar
  6. CHANTREY, D. F. (1972). Enhancement and retardation of discrimination learning in chicks after exposure to discriminanda. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 81, 256–261.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. FERSEN, L., von, & LEA, S. E. G. (1990). Category discrimination with polymorphous features. The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. GELLERMANN, L. W. (1933). Chance orders of alternating stimuli in visual discrimination experiments. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 42, 206–208.Google Scholar
  9. KENDLER, H. H., & KENDLER, T. S. (1968). Mediation and conceptual behavior. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 197–244). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. LEA S. E. G. (1984). In what sense do pigeons learn concepts? In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 263–276). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. LEA, S. E. G., RYAN C. M. E., & KIRBY, R. M. (1990). Instances to category generalization following pigeons’ learning of an artificial concept discrimination. Internal Report, Animal Psychology Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, 90/1, 1–38.Google Scholar
  12. NAKAGAWA, E. (1986). Overtraining, extinction and shift learning in a concurrent discrimination in rats. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38B, 313–326.Google Scholar
  13. NAKAGAWA, E. (1992). Effects of overtraining on reversal learning by rats in concurrent and single discriminations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44B, 37–56.Google Scholar
  14. PEARCE, J. M., & WILSON, P. N. (1990). Configurai associations in discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 250–261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. RESCORLA, R. A. (1981). Simultaneous associations. In P. Harzern & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Advances in analysis of behavior, Vol. 2: Predictability, correlation and contiguity (pp. 47–80). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. SANDERS, B. (1971). Factors affecting reversal and nonreversal shifts in rats and children. Journal of Comparative an Physiological Psychology, 74, 192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. SIDMAN, M., WYNNE C. K., MACGUIRE, R. W., & BARNES, T. (1989). Functional classes and equivalence relations. The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 261–274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. SIEGEL, S., & CASTELLAN, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  19. STADDON, J. E. R., & FRANK, J. (1974). Mechanisms of discrimination reversal in pigeons. Animal Behavior, 22, 802–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. STEWART, D. J., CAPRETTA, P. J., COOPER, A. J., & LITTLEFIELD, V. M. (1977). Learning in domestic chicks after exposure to both discriminanda. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 91, 1095–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. WILLIAMS, D. I. (1967). The overtraining reversal effect in the pigeon. Psychonomic Science, 7, 261–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. VAUGHAN, W. (1988). Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Process, 14, 36–42.Google Scholar
  23. VAUGHAN, W., & HERRNSTEIN, R. J. (1987). Choosing among natural stimuli. The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 5–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. XIA, L, WYNNE C. D., von MÜNCHOW-POHL, F., & DELIUS, J. D. (1991). Psychobasic: A Basic dialect for the control of psychological experiments with the Commodore-64 and Delà interfacing. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 23, 72–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ZENTALL, T. R., STEIRN, J. N., SHERBOURNE, L M., & URCUIOLI, P. J. (1991). Common coding in pigeons assessed through partial versus total reversals of many-to-one conditional and simple discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 194–201.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan D. Delius
    • 1
  • Manuela Ameling
    • 1
  • Stephen E. G. Lea
    • 1
  • J. E. R. Staddon
    • 1
  1. 1.Allgemeine PsychologieUniversität KonstanzKonstanzGermany

Personalised recommendations