The Psychological Record

, Volume 62, Issue 1, pp 115–124 | Cite as

Interdependency Between Risk Assessments for Self and Other in the Field of Comparative Optimism: The Contribution of Response Times

Article
First Online:

Abstract

By introducing a response-time measure in the field of comparative optimism, this study was designed to explore how people estimate risk to self and others depending on the evaluation order (self/other or other/self). Our results show the interdependency between self and other answers. Indeed, while response time for risk assessment for the self does not vary depending on the evaluation order, assessment for an average other takes longer in the other/self than in the self/other order. Thus, prior self-estimate appears to facilitate the construction of subsequent risk estimates for others. Our data indicate that the two evaluation orders do not correspond to strictly equivalent procedures; the other/self order requires extra cognitive effort and leads to greater comparative optimism levels. These findings should alert researchers that the measurement procedures, classically considered as interchangeable in the area of comparative optimism, actually generate different ways to construct the answers. Our results are discussed in terms of anchoring and asymmetry effects.

Key words

response time comparative optimism self-reference order effect anchoring effect 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AUCOTE, H. M., & GOLD, R. S. (2005). Non-equivalence of direct and indirect measures of unrealistic optimism. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 10(4), 376–383. doi:10.1080/1354850042000326601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BATES, T. C., & STOUGH, C. (1998). Improved reaction time method, information processing speed, and intelligence. Intelligence, 26(1), 53–62. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(99)80052-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CAMPBELL, J., GREENAUER, N., MACALUSO, K., & END, C. (2007). Unrealistic optimism in Internet events. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1273–1284. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CHAMBERS, J. R., WINDSCHITL, P. D., & SULS, J. (2003). Egocentrism, event frequency, and comparative optimism: When what happens frequently is “more likely to happen to me.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1343–1356. doi:10.1177/0146167203256870CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. CLEMENT, R. W., & KRUEGER, J. (2000). The primacy of self-referent information in social consensus. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 279–299. doi:10.1348/014466600164471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. DUNNING, D. (2002). The relation of self to social perception. In M. Leary and J. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 421–441). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. DUNNING, D., & HAYES, A. F. (1996). Evidence for egocentric comparison in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 213–229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EISER, J. R., PAHL, S., & PRINS, Y. R. A. (2001). Optimism, pessimism, and the direction of self-other comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 77–84. doi:10.1006/jesp.2000.1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. GILOVICH, T., & GRIFFIN, D. W. (2010). Judgment and decision making. In D. T. Gilbert and S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Pp. 542–588). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  10. GOLD, R. S. (2008). Unrealistic optimism and event threat. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 13, 193–201. doi:10.1080/13548500701426745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. HARRIS, P., & MIDDLETON, W. (1994). The illusion of control and optimism about health: On being less at risk but no more in control than others. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 369–386. doi:10.1039/FD9949900369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. HIGGINS, E. T., & BARGH, J. A. (1987). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 369–425. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.002101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. HOORENS, V. (1995). Self-favoring biases, self-presentation and the self-other asymmetry in social comparison. Journal of Personality, 63, 793–817. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00317.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. HOORENS, V., & BUUNK, B. P. (1993). Social comparison of health risks: Locus of control, the person-positivity bias and unrealistic optimism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 291–302. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01088.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. INGLEDEW, D. K., & BRUNNING, S. (1999). Personality, preventive health behaviour and comparative optimism about health problems. Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 193–208. doi:10.1177/135910539900400213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. KARYLOWSKI, J. J. (1990). Social reference points and the accessibility of trait related information in self-other similarity judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 975–983. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. KLAR, Y., & GILADI, E. E. (1999). Are most people happier than their peers, or are they just happy? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(5), 585–594. doi:10.1177/0146167299025005004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. KOSINSKI, R. J. (2008). A literature review on reaction time. Clemson University, Department of Biological Sciences. Retrieved January 15, 2009, from http://biology.clemson.edu/bpc/bp/Lab/110/reaction.htmGoogle Scholar
  19. KRUGER, J., WINDSCHITL, P. D., BURRUS, J., FESSEL F., & CHAMBERS, J. R. (2008). The rational side of egocentrism in social comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 220–232. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. LE BARBENCHON, E., MILHABET, I., STEINER, D. D., & PRIOLO, D. (2008). Social acceptance of exhibiting optimism. Current Research in Social Psychology, 14(4), 52–63.Google Scholar
  21. OTTEN, W., & VAN DER PLIGT, J. (1996). Context effects in the measurement of comparative optimism in probability judgments. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 80–101. doi:10.1521/jscp.1996.15.1.80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. PERLOFF, L., & FETZER, B. (1986). Self-other judgments and perceived vulnerability to victimisation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 502–510. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. PRICE, P. C., PENTESCOT, H. C., & VOTH, R. D. (2002). Perceived event frequency and the optimistic bias: Evidence for a two-process model of personal risk judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 242–252. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ROSE, J. P., ENDO, Y., WINDSCHITL, P. D., & SULS, J. (2008). Cultural differences in unrealistic optimism and pessimism: The role of egocentrism and direct vs. indirect comparison measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1236–1248. doi:10.1177/0146167208319764CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. SPITZENSTETTER, F. (2003). Biais d’optimisme et biais de mesure: L’évaluation relative ou absolue du risque personnel. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 58, 19–27. doi:10.1016/j.pto.2006.05.001Google Scholar
  26. WEINSTEIN, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806–820. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. WELKENHUYSEN, M., EVERS-KIEBOOMS, G., DECRUYENAERE, M., & VAN DEN BERGHE, H. (1996). Unrealistic optimism and genetic risk. Psychology and Health, 11, 479–492. doi:10.1080/08870449608401984CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire de Psychologie des CognitionsFaculté de Psychologie (Université de Strasbourg), t12, rue Goethe, 67000StrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations