The Psychological Record

, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 665–676 | Cite as

Psychology From the Standpoint of an Interbehaviorist: A Review of “Modern Perspectives on J. R. Kantor and Interbehaviorism

Reno, NV: Context Press Pp. xiv + 316. ISBN-13: 978-1-878978-56-1. $49.95 PB
  • Gary Greenberg
Book Review


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ARONSON, L. R. (1984). Levels of integration and organization: A reevaluation of the evolutionary scale. In G. Greenberg & E. Tobach (Eds.), Evolution of behavior and integrative levels (pp. 57–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. ARONSON, L. R., TOBACH, E., ROSENBLATT, J. R., & LEHRMAN, D. H. (Eds.). (1972). Selected writings of T. C. Schneirla. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  3. BLOCK, J. (2008). The Q-sort in character appraisal: Encoding subjective impressions of persons quantitatively. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BLUMBERG, M. (2005). Basic instinct: The genesis of behavior. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.Google Scholar
  5. DEWEY, J., & BENTLEY, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  6. FORD, D. H., & LERNER, R. M. (1992). Developmental systems theory: An integrative approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. GOTTLIEB, G. (1992). Individual development and evolution: The genesis of novel behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. GREENBERG, G., & HARAWAY, M. M. (2002). Principles of comparative psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  9. GREENBERG, G., & LAMBDIN, C. G. (2007). Psychology is a behavioral science, not a biological science. A discussion of the issue and a review of Neural Theories of Mind: Why the Mind-Brain Problem May Never Be Solved by William Uttal. The Psychological Record, 57, 457–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. GREENBERG, G., & PARTRIDGE, G. (2000). Prologemena to Praxiology redux: The psychology of Zing-Yang Kuo. From Past to future: Clark papers on the history of psychology. Vol 2, pp. 13–37.Google Scholar
  11. GREENBERG, G., PARTRIDGE, T., & ABLAH, E. (2002). The significance of the concept of emergence for comparative psychology. In D. A. Washburn (Ed.), Primate perspectives on behavior and cognition (pp. 81–97). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  12. GREENBERG, G., PARTRIDGE, T., MOSACK, V., & Lambdin, C. G. (2006). Psychology is a developmental science. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 19, 185–205.Google Scholar
  13. GREENBERG, G., PARTRIDGE, T., WEISS, E., & PISULA, W. (2004). Comparative psychology, a new perspective for the 21st century: Up the spiral staircase. Developmental Psychobiology, 44, 1–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. HAGGBLOOM, S. J., WARNICK, R., WARNICK, J. E., JONES, V. K., YARBROUGH, G. L., RUSSELL, T. M., BORECKY, et al. (2002). The 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century. Review of General Psychology, 6, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. HALPERN, C. T., HOOD, K. E., & LERNER, R. M. (2007). Integrating nature and nurture through developmental systems: The contributions of Gilbert Gottlieb. European Journal of Developmental Science, 1(2).Google Scholar
  16. KANTOR, J. R. (1924). Principles of psychology (Vol. 1). Chicago: Principia Press.Google Scholar
  17. KANTOR, J. R. (1926). Principles of psychology (Vol. 2). Chicago: Principia Press.Google Scholar
  18. KANTOR, J. R. (1959). Interbehavioral psychology (2nd ed.). Chicago: Principia Press.Google Scholar
  19. KANTOR, J. R. (1963). The scientific evolution of psychology (Vol. 1). Chicago: Principia Press.Google Scholar
  20. KANTOR, J. R. (1969). The scientific evolution of psychology (Vol. 2). Chicago: Principia Press.Google Scholar
  21. KUO, Z.-Y. (1967). The dynamics of behavior development. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  22. LAZAR, J. (1978). A comparison of some theoretical proposals of J. R. Kantor and T. C. Schneirla. The Psychological Record, 24, 177–190.Google Scholar
  23. L’ABATE, L. (2005). Personality in intimate relationships: Socialization and psychopathology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. LERNER, R. M. (2002). Concepts and theories of human development (3rd. ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. NOVIKOFF, A. (1945). The concept of integrative levels and biology. Science, 101, 209–215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. OYAMA, S., GRIFFITHS, P. E., & GRAY, R. D. (Eds.). (2001). Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.Google Scholar
  27. PEPPER, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. PRONKO, N. H. (1980). Psychology from the standpoint of an interbehaviorist. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  29. ROBERT, J. S. (2004). Embryology, epigenesis, and evolution: Taking development seriously. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. RUMBAUGH, D. M., KING, J. E., BERAN, M. J., WASHBURN, D. A., & GOULD, K. L. (2007). A salience theory of learning and behavior: With perspectives on neurobiology and cognition. International Journal of Primatology, 28, 973–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. SCHNEIRLA, T. C. (1949). Levels in the psychological capacities of animals. In R. W. Sellars, V. J. McGill, & M. Farber (Eds.), Philosophy for the future (pp. 243–286). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. UTTAL, W. R. (2005). Neural theories of mind: Why the mind-brain problem may never be solved. Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary Greenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Wichita State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations