The Psychological Record

, Volume 58, Issue 3, pp 329–337 | Cite as

The Long Good-Bye: Why B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior is Alive and Well on the 50Th Anniversary of Its Publication

  • Henry D. Schlinger


The year 2007 marked the 50th anniversary of the publication of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior, a book that by Skinner’s own account was his most important. the received view, however, is that a devastating review by a young linguist not only rendered Skinner’s interpretation of language moot but was also a major factor in ending the hegemony of behaviorism in psychology and paving the way for a cognitive revolution. Nevertheless, in taking stock of Verbal Behavior and behaviorism, both appear to be thriving. This article suggests that Verbal Behavior and behaviorism remain vital partly because they have generated successful practical applications.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ANDRESEN, J. (1991). Skinner and Chomsky 30 years later or: The return of the repressed. The Behavior Analyst, 14, 49–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. CHOMSKY, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  3. CHOMSKY, N. (1959). Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DYMOND, S., O’HORA, D., WHELAN, R., & O’DONOVAN, A. (2006). Citation analysis of Skinner’s Verbal behavior: 1984-2004. The Behavior Analyst, 29, 75–88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. EDELMAN, G. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. GREER, R. D., & ROSS, D. E., (2008). Verbal behavior analysis: Developing and expanding verbal capabilities in children with language delays. Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Merrill.Google Scholar
  7. HALLIDAY, M.A.K. (1985). Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. HALLIDAY, M.A.K., & HASAN, R. (1985). Tanguage, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. HERNANDEZ, E., HANLEY, G. P., INGVARSSON, E. T., & TIGER, J. H. (2007). A preliminary evaluation of the emergence of novel mand forms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 137–156.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. HUNT, M. (1982). The universe within: A new science explores the human mind. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  11. KNAPP, T. J. (1992). Verbal Behavior: The other reviews. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 10, 87–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. LERMAN, D. C., PARTEN, M., ADDISON, L.R., VORNDRAN, C. M., VOLKERT, V. M., & KODAK, T. (2005). A methodology for assessing the functions of emerging speech in children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 303–316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. LOWENKRON, B. (1998). Some logical functions of joint control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69, 327–354.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. LOWENKRON, B. (2006). An introduction to joint control. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 123–127.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. MACQUORODALE, K. (1970). On Chomsky’s review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MCPHERSON, A., BONEM, M., GREEN, G., & OSBORNE, J. G. (1984). A citation analysis of the influence on research of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 157–167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. MIGUEL, C. F., PETURSDOTTIR, A., & CARR, J. (2005). The effects of multiple-tact and receptive-discrimination training on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 27–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. PALMER, D. C. (2006a). On Chomsky’s appraisal of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 29, 253–267.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. PALMER, D. C. (2006b). Joint control: A discussion of recent research. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 209–215.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. ROEDIGER, R. (March, 2004). What happened to behaviorism? Aps Observer.Google Scholar
  21. SAUTTER, R. A., & LEBLANC, L. (2006). Empirical applications of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior with humans. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 35–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. SIDENER, D. W. (2006). Joint control for dummies: An elaboration of Lowenkron’s model of joint (stimulus) control. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 119–122.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. SKINNER, B. F. (1977). The experimental analysis of operant behavior. In R. W. Reiber & K. Salzinger (Eds.), The roots of American psychology: Historical influences and implications for the future (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 291, pp. 374–385). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  25. SKINNER, B. F. (1987). Controversy? In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), B. P. Skinner: Consensus and controversy (pp. 11–12). New York: Falmer.Google Scholar
  26. VIRUES-ORTEGA, J. (2006). The case against B. F. Skinner 45 years later: An encounter with N. Chomsky. The Behavior Analyst, 29, 243–251.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. WALLACE, M. D., IWATA, B. A., & HANLEY, G. P. (2006). Establishment of mands following tact training as a function of reinforcer strength. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 17–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. WRIGHT, A. N. (2006). The role of modeling and automatic reinforcement in the construction of the passive voice. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 153–169.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. WYATT, W. J., HAWKINS, R. P., & DAVIS, P. (1986). Behaviorism: Are reports of its death exaggerated? The Behavior Analyst, 9, 101–105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. YI, J. I., CHRISTIAN, L., VITTIMBERGA, G., & LOWENKRON, B. (2006). Generalized negatively reinforced manding in children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 21–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California State UniversityLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations