Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 203–219 | Cite as

A Comparison Between Adults With Conduct Disorder And Normal Controls on a Continuous Performance Test: Differences in Impulsive Response Characteristics

  • Donald M. Dougherty
  • James M. Bjork
  • Dawn M. Marsh
  • F. Gerard Moeller
Article

Abstract

Continuous Performance Test (CPT) responding was compared between 15 adults with a history (childhood/adolescent) of Conduct Disorder (CD) and 15 normal controls. Of particular interest was whether response latencies and commission errors, which have been suggested to be measures of impulsivity, would differ between the groups. The CPT procedure used included two conditions: Immediate Memory Task and Delayed Memory Task (IMT/DMT; Dougherty et al., 1998). Both the IMT (0.5-s delay) and DMT (3.5-s delay with distracter stimuli at 0.5-s intervals) required the subject to respond if a briefly displayed number was identical to the one presented before it. Stimuli included target (identical match), catch (four of five digits matched), and novel (no match). Participants completed six 22-min testing sessions scheduled across a single day. The most significant findings were that the CD group (compared to the control group) had (a) elevated commission errors (responses to catch stimuli); (b) lower stimulus discriminability (between target and catch stimuli); and (c) shorter response latencies. These results are consistent with the few previous studies indicating that these parameters are related to impulsive behaviors.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ANSLIE, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82(4), 463–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BARRALT, E. S. (1965). Factor analysis of some psychometric measures of impulsiveness and anxiety. Psychological Reports, 16, 547–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BARRATI, E. S. (1985). Impulsiveness subtraits: Arousal and information processing. In J. T. Spence & C. E. Izard (Eds.), Motivation, Emotion, and Personality (pp. 137–146). North-Holland, NY: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.Google Scholar
  4. BAUER, L. O. (1997). Frontal P300 decrements, childhood conduct disorder, family history, and the prediction of relapse among abstinent cocaine abusers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 44, 1–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. BECK, A. T., BROWN, G., EPSTEIN, N., & STEER, R. S. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893–897.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. BECK, A. T., RUSH, A. J., SHAW, B. F., & EMERY, G. (1979). Cognitive theory of depression. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. BRANCHEY, M. H., BUYDENS-BRANCHEY, L., & HORVATH, T. B. (1993). Event related potentials in substance abusing individuals after long term abstinence. American Journal of Addiction, 2, 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CORNBLATI, B. A., & KEILP, J. G. (1994). Impaired attention, genetics, and the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Schizphrenia Bulletin, 20, 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CURTISS, G., & TUTTLE, K. (1993). Wisconsin card sorting test: Computer version 2 [Program Manual]. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
  10. DOUGHERTY, D. M., MOELLER, F. G., STEINBERG, J. L., MARSH, D. M., HINES, S. E., & BJORK, J. M. (1999). Alcohol increases commission error rates for a continuous performance test. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 23(8), 1342–1351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DOUGHERTY, D. M., STEINBERG, J., WASSEF, A. A., MEDEARIS, D., CHEREK, D. R., & MOELLER, F. G. (1998). Immediate versus delayed visual memory task performance among schizophrenic patients and normal controls. Psychiatry Research, 79, 255–265.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. DYKMAN, R. A., ACKERMAN, P. T., & OGLESBY, D. M. (1979). Selective and sustained attention in hyperactive, learning-disabled and normal boys. Journal of NeNous and Mental Disease, 167, 288–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ERLENMEYER-KIMLING, L., & CORNBLATT, B. (1987). High-risk research in schizophrenia: A summary of what has been learned. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 21, 401–411.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. FIRST, M. B., SPITZER, R. L., GIBBON, M., & WILLIAMS, J. B. W. (1996). Structured Clinical Interview for Dsm-Iv Axis I Disorders: Non-patient Edition (Scid-Np). Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Ny.Google Scholar
  15. GESCHEIDER, G. A. (1985). Psychophysics: Method, theory, and application (p. 97). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. GORENSTEIN, E. E., & NEWMAN, J. P. (1980). Disinhibitory psychopathology: A new perspective and a model for research. Psychological Review, 87, 301–315.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. GREEN, L., & RACHLIN, H. (1996). Commitment using punishment. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(3): 593–601.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. HALPERIN, J. M., WOLF, L., GREENBLATT, E. R., & YOUNG, G. (1991). Subtype analysis of commission errors on the continuous performance test in children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 7, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. HALPERIN, J. M., WOLF, L. E., PASCUALVACA, D. M., NEWCORN, J. H., HEALEY, J. M., O'BRIEN, J. D., MORGANSTEIN, A., & YOUNG, J. G. (1988). Differential assessment of attention and impulsivity in children. Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 326–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. HEATON, R. K., CURTISS, G., TUTTLE, K., & PAR Staff (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Computer (Version 2) [Computer Software]. Odessa, FI: Psychological Assessment Resources, IncGoogle Scholar
  21. KOCH, M., & MORGUET, M. (1985). Investigation in the use of a vigilance test in psychomedical assessment. Blutalkohol, 22, 391–396.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. LOEBER, R. (1990). Development and risk factors of juvenile antisocial behavior and delinquency. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MILLER, R. C. (1984). The effect of low doses of alcohol on human behavior. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  24. NUECHTERLEIN, K. H., & DAWSON, M. E. (1984). Information proceSsing and attentional functioning in the developmental course of schizophrenic disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 10, 160–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. OLLMAN, R. (1966). Fast guess in choice reaction time. Psychonomic Sciences, 6, 155–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. O'DOUGHERTY, M., NUECHTERLEIN, K. H., & DREW, B. (1984). Hyperactive and hypoxic children: Signal detection, sustained attention, and behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 178–191.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. PATTON, J. M., STANFORD, M. S., & BARRATT, E. S. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768–774.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. QUAY, H. C. (1988). The behavioral reward and inhibition system in childhood behavior disorder. In L. M. Bloomingdale (Ed.), Attention Deficit Disorder (Vol. 3, pp. 176–186). New York: Spectrum.Google Scholar
  29. RACHLIN, H., RAINERI, A., & CROSS, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55(2), 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ROBERTS, L. E., RAU, H., LULZENBERGER, W., & BIRBAUMER, N. (1994). Mapping P300 waves onto inhibition: Go/No-Go discrimination. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 92, 44–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. ROSVOLD, H. E., MIRSKY, A., SARASON, I., BRANSOME, E. D., Jr., & BECK, L. H. (1956). A continuous performance test of brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 20, 343–350.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. SCHACHAR, R. J., TANNOCK, R., & LOGAN, G. (1993). Inhibitory control, impulsiveness, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 721–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. SERGEANT, J. A., & SHOLTON, C. A. (1985). On resources strategy limitations in hyperactivity: Cognitive impulsivity reconsidered. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 25, 809–819.Google Scholar
  34. SOSTEK, A. J., BUCHSBAUM, M. S., & RAPOPORT, J. L. (1980). Effects of amphetamine on vigilance performance in normal and hyperactive children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 491–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. SPERLING, G. (1984). A unified theory of attention and Signal detection. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 103–181). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  36. SPLLZER, R. L., WILLIAMS, J. B. W., GIBBON, M., & FIRST, M. B. (1990). Structured clinical interview for Dsm-Iii-R — personality disorders (Scid-Ii, Version 1.0). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  37. SWANSON, L. (1981). Vigilance deficit in learning disabled children: A signal detection analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22, 393–399.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. SYKES, D. H., DOUGLAS, V. I., & MORGENSTERN, G. (1973). Sustained attention in hyperactive children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 14, 213–220.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. SYKES, D. H., DOUGLAS, V. I., WEISS, G., & MINDE, K. K. (1971). Attention in hyperactive children and the effect of methylphenidate (Ritalin). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 12, 129–139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. WINDLE, M., & WINDLE, R. C. (1993). The continuity of behavioral expression among disinhibited and inhibited childhood subtypes. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 741–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. WOHLBERG, G. W., & KORNETSKY, C. (1973). Sustained attention in remitted schizophrenics. Archives of General Psychiatry, 28, 533–537.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. YELLOT, J. I. (1971). Corrections for fast guessing and speed-accuracy-tradeoff in choice reaction time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 8, 159–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald M. Dougherty
    • 1
  • James M. Bjork
    • 1
  • Dawn M. Marsh
    • 1
  • F. Gerard Moeller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral SciencesHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations