Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 493–500 | Cite as

Need for a Theoretical Justification of Humanistic Commitment Components in Behavior Therapy

  • E. Rae Harcum
  • Barry N. Burijon
  • Neill Watson
Article

Abstract

Although behavior therapies are putatively based on traditional learning paradigms, standard clinical practice with outpatient clients presenting problems of personal adjustment routinely requires a voluntary commitment to collaboration (CTC) with the therapist (Harcum, Burijon, & Watson, 1988). Nevertheless, in the various summaries of the theoretical justification, even for cognitive behavior therapy, the mainstream literature generally omits this presumably necessary humanistic component and includes only acceptable principles from traditional learning paradigms. Development of a comprehensive theory of behavior therapy is prevented by this failure to acknowledge the need for a theoretical justification of CTC. This avoidance is attributed to a fear of being considered unscientifiC., fostered by traditional graduate training in psychology.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AGRAS, W. S., KAZDIN, A. E., & WILSON, G. T. (1979). Behavior therapy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  2. BANDURA, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behavior Research and Therapy. (1987). 25(3), (inside back cover).Google Scholar
  4. EPSTEIN, L. H., & WING, R. R. (1984). Behavioral contracting: Health behaviors. In C. M. Franks (Ed.), New developments in behavior therapy: From research to clinical application (pp. 409–449). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  5. ERICKSON, R. C. (1973). “Free will” and clinical research. Psychotherapy: Theory Research, and Practice, 10, 10–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eysenck, H. J. (1964). The nature of behavior therapy. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), Experiments in behavior therapy (pp. 1–15). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  7. FRANKS, C. M., & BRADY, J. P. (1970). Editorial: What is Behavior Therapy and why a new Journal? Behavior Therapy, 1, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. FREEMAN, A. (1987). Cognitive therapy: An overview. In A. Fromm & V. B. Greenwood (Eds.), Cognitive therapy (pp. 13–35). New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  9. GLASSER, W. (1965). Reality therapy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  10. GREENWALD, H. (1973). Decision therapy. New York: Peter H. Wyden.Google Scholar
  11. HARCUM, E. R. (1975). Serial learning and paralearning. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  12. HARCUM, E. R. (1988). Defensive reactance of psychologists to a metaphysical foundation for integrating different psychologies. The Journal of Psychology, 122, 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. HARCUM, E. R. (1989). Commitment to collaboration as a prerequisite for existential commonality in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 26, 200–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. HARCUM, E. R., BURIJON, B. N., & WATSON, N. (1988). Client responsibility in the practitioners’ operational definition of behavior therapy. Journal of Human Behavior and Learning, 25, 41–43.Google Scholar
  15. HARDING, J. (1976). Behavioristic and humanistic approaches: Compatible or incompatible. In A. Wandersman, P. Poppen, & D. Ricks (Eds.), Humanism and behaviorism: Dialogue and growth (pp. 193–206). Oxford: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. HAYES, S. C. (1984). But whose behaviorism is it? Contemporary Psychology, 29, 203–206.Google Scholar
  17. Information for authors. (1987). Behavior Therapy, 18(2), (inside back cover).Google Scholar
  18. KANFER, F. H., & HAGERMAN, S. M. (1985). Behavior therapy and the information-processing paradigm. In S. Reiss & R. R. Bootzin (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 3–33). Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. KOCH, S. (1981). The nature and limits of psychological knowledge: Lessons of a century qua “Science.” American Psychologist, 36, 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lichtenstein, P. E. (1984). Interbehaviorism in psychology and in the philosophy of science. The Psychological Record, 34, 455–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. LOCKE, E. A. (1971). Is “behavior therapy” behavioristic? Psychological Bulletin, 76, 318–327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. MAHONEY, M. J. (1985). Psychotherapy and human change processes. In M. J. Mahoney & A. Freeman (Eds.), Cognition and psychotherapy (pp. 3–48). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MASLOW, A. H. (1965). Humanistic science and transcendent experiences. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 5, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MASTERS, J. C., BURISH, T. G., HOLLON, S. D., & RIMM, D. C. (1987). Behavior therapy: Techniques and empirical findings (3rd ed.). San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch.Google Scholar
  25. O’HARA, M. (1986). Comment on Carl Roger’s “Toward a more human science of the person.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 25, 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. PAPAJOHN, J. C. (1982). Intensive behavior therapy. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  27. POLKINGHORNE, D. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  28. PROCHASKA, J. O., & Dl ClEMENTE, C. C. (1986). In W. R. Miller & Nick Heather (Eds.), Treating addictive behaviors (pp. 3–27). New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  29. RICKS, D. F., & FLEMING, P. (1976). Humanistic and behavioral approaches from a life history perspective. In A. Wandersman, P. Poppen, & D. Ricks (Eds.) Humanism and behaviorism: Dialogue and growth (pp. 269–287). Oxford: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. RICKS, D. F., WANDERSMAN, A., & POPPEN, P. J. (1976). Humanism and behaviorism: Toward new syntheses. In A. Wandersman, P. J. Poppen, & D. F. Ricks (Eds.), Humanism and behaviorism: Dialogue and growth (pp. 383–402). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  31. ROGERS, C. R., & SKINNER, B. F. (1956). Some issues concerning the control of human behavior: A symposium. Science, 124, 1057–1066.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. RUBEN, D. H. (1986). The “interbehavioral” approach to treatment. Journal of Contemporary Psychology, 16, 62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. RYCHLAK, J. F. (1984). Newtonianism and the professional responsibility of psychologists: Who speaks for humanity? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 15, 82–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. SMITH, N. W. (1984). Fundamentals of interbehavioral psychology. The Psychological Record, 34, 479–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. STAATS, A. W. (1981). Paradigmatic behaviorism: Unified theory construction methods, and the Zeitgeist of separatism. American Psychologist, 36, 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. WILSON, G. T., & O’LEARY, K. D. (1980). Principles of behavior therapy. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  37. YALOM, I. D. (1980). Existential psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  38. ZIMMERMAN, D. W. (1984). A note on the completeness of the scientific method. The Psychological Record, 34, 175–179.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Rae Harcum
    • 1
  • Barry N. Burijon
    • 1
  • Neill Watson
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentThe College of William and MaryWilliamsburgUSA

Personalised recommendations