Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 543–555 | Cite as

Analysis of Cheating on Academic Assignments

  • William M. Gardner
  • James T. Roper
  • Claudia C. Gonzalez
  • Royce G. Simpson
Article

Abstract

Instances of cheating on study guide assignments were observed for 245 college students. Mean cheating rate was 50.8% (i.e., the typical student cheated on about half the study guide questions). Cheating on assignments tended to increase across the semester and was associated with lower grades on exams. The typical student’s tendency to cheat varied considerably across the semester, suggesting that transient setting factors were major determinants of cheating on assignments. Admission of cheating was increased by reinforcement, but this increase in admissions did not result in a corresponding change in rates of cheating. A positive correlation was found between cheating and admission of cheating, except when penalties were instated for admissions. Neither an honor pledge nor values counseling (involving confrontation about actual rates of cheating) diminished cheating. In fact high-rate cheaters generally did not even bother to attend the scheduled counseling sessions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BARLOW, J. A. (1967). Note: Student cheating in studying programmed material. The Psychological Record, 17, 515–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BARTON, E. J. (1982). Facilitating student veracity: Instructor application of behavioral technology to self modification projects. Teaching of Psychology, 9, 99–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. EISENBERGER, R., & SHANK, M. D. (1985). Personal work ethic and effort training affect cheating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 520–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ERICKSON, M., & SMITH, W. B., JR. (1974). On the relation between self-reported and actual deviance: An empirical test. Humbolt Journal of Social Relations, 2, 106–113.Google Scholar
  5. GARDNER, W. M., & ROPER, J. T. (1986). Cii study guide for principles of psychology. Jacksonville, AL: The Psychology Institute, Jacksonville State University.Google Scholar
  6. HINDMAN, C. D. (1980). Crib notes in the classroom: Cheaters never win. Teaching of Psychology, 7, 166–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. KANTOR, J. R. (1959). Interbehavioralpsychology, Chicago, IL: Principia Press.Google Scholar
  8. KARABENICK, S. A., & SRULL, T. K. (1978). Effects of personality and situational variation in locus of control on cheating: Determinants of the “congruence effect” Journal of Personality, 46, 72–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. LANZA-KADUCE, L., & KLUG, M. (1986). Learning to cheat: The interaction of moral-development and social learning theory. Deviant Behavior, 7, 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. SHELTON, J., & HILL, J. P. (1969). Effects on cheating of achievement anxiety and knowledge of peer performance. Developmental Psychology, 1, 449–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. WAHLER, R. G., & FOX, J. J. (1981). Setting events in applied behavior analysis: Toward a conceptual and methodological expansion. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 327–338.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. WINSTON, A. S. (1978). Experimental analysis of admission of cheating: An exploratory study. The Psychological Record, 28, 517–523.Google Scholar
  13. WORTHINGTON., E. L., JR. (1977). Honesty and success in self-modification projects for a college class. Teaching of Psychology 4, 78–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • William M. Gardner
    • 1
  • James T. Roper
    • 1
  • Claudia C. Gonzalez
    • 1
  • Royce G. Simpson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyJacksonville State UniversityJacksonvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations