Stimulus Control of Consumer Opinion by Brand Names: A Social Conditioning Analysis
- 2 Downloads
Abstract
A field experiment is reported that investigated the relationship between brand names (conditioned stimuli) and consumers’ opinion (evaluation) responses. Product trademarks (Pepsi or Coke), but not actual products (Classic Coke or Pepsi), influenced consumers’ ratings during a cola’ laste test.” The effect of brand names depended on the initial attitudes of consumers (conditioning history). Consumers with positive-initial attitudes to a brand (Coke) showed higher opinion and evaluation scores to products with this brand name than to products with an alternate-brand name (Pepsi), regardless of the actual products sampled. In contrast, consumers with negative (or neutral) attitudes to the brand (Coke) rated products higher in the presence of an alternate-brand name (Pepsi) than when the brand name accompanied the sampled product. This interaction of brand name with initial attitude was not mediated by product knowledge (i.e., cognitive responses). Additionally, as consumer preference for the brand (Coke) increased, the magnitude of the opinion and evaluation responses decreased for products with an alternate-brand name (Pepsi). Consumers with exclusive preference for a brand thus derogated any product with a competing-brand name. Generally, these results are compatible with a social-conditioning analysis of attitudes that emphasizes the multiple-stimulus functions of product trademarks, labels, and brand names.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- BEM, D. J. (1965). An experimental analysis of self-persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- BEM, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- BREHM, J. W. (1956). Post-decision changes in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- BREHM, J. W., & COHEN, A. R. (1959). Re-evaluation of choice alternatives as a function of their number and qualitative similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- BYRNE, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- BYRNE, D., & CLORE, G. L. (1970). A reinforcement model of evaluative responses. Personality: An International Journal, 1, 103–128.Google Scholar
- BYRNE, D., & NELSON, D. (1965). Attraction as a linear function of proportion of positive reinforcements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 659–653.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- FEINBERG, R. A. (1986). Credit cards as spending facilitating stimuli: A conditioning interpretation. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 348–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- GLASS, G. V., & STANLEY, J. C. (1970). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- LOTT, A. J., & LOTT, B. (1974). The role of reward in the formation of positive interpersonal attitudes. In T. L. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- MCGINNIES, E. (1970). Social behavior: A functional analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- PIERCE, W. D. (1987). Which Coke is it? Social influence in the marketplace. Psychological Reports, 60, 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ROSENTHAL, R. (1976). Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
- STAATS, A. W. (1975). Social behaviorism. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.Google Scholar