The Psychological Record

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 21–37 | Cite as

An Application of the Species-Specific Defense Reaction Hypothesis

  • Michael R. Petersen
  • David O. Lyon
Article
First Online:
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Acquisition of lever pressing by rats required to escape and avoid unsignalled shock in a test chamber equipped with 2 response levers was examined. Similarity of the arbitrary lever press to one of the S’s species-specific defense reactions (SSDR) to shock —flight—was manipulated by raising and lowering sliding hatches directly above and behind each response lever. Specific sequences of manipulating abortive escape routes proved critical, but results generally support Bolles’ assertion that learning an avoidance response is facilitated if the required response is a SSDR to the aversive stimulus —or at least closely resembles one. In addition, data on escape and avoidance lever-holding during successive portions of the session verify, with only minor qualification, Bolles’ account of the importance of freezing, another Ssdr, in the acquisition of the lever-press avoidance response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BOLLES, R. C. 1969. Avoidance and escape learning: Simultaneous acquisition of different responses. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 68, 355–358.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. BOLLES, R. C. 1970. Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning. Psychological Review, 77, 32–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BOLLES, R. C. 1971. Species-specific defense reactions. In F. R. Brush (Ed.), Aversive conditioning and learning. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 183–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BOLLES, R. C. 1972. Reinforcement, expectancy and learning. Psychological Review, 79, 394–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BOLLES, R. C., & MCGILLIS, D. B. 1968. The non-operant nature of the bar-press escape response. Psychonomic Science, 11, 261–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BOREN, J. J. 1961. Isolation of post-shock responding in a free-operant avoidance procedure. Psychological Reports, 9, 265–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. D’AMATO, M.R., & SCHIFF, D. 1964. Long-term discriminated avoidance performance in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 57, 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DINSMOOR, J. 1958. A new shock grid for rats. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 264.Google Scholar
  9. FELDMAN, R. S., & BREMNER, F. D. 1963. A method for rapid conditioning of stable avoidance bar-pressing behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis Behavior, 6, 393–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. HERRNSTEIN, R. J. 1969. Method and theory in the study of avoidance. Psychological Review, 76, 49–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. HOFFMAN, H. 1966. The analysis of discriminated avoidance. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Pp. 499–530.Google Scholar
  12. MEYER, D. R., CHO, C., & WESEMANN, A. F. 1960. On problems of conditioning discriminated lever-press avoidance responses. Psychological Review, 67, 224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. SELIGMAN, M. E. P. 1970. On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Review, 77, 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. SELIGMAN, M. E. P., ANDHAGER, J. L. 1972. Biological boundaries of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  15. SIDMAN, M. 1953. Two temporal parameters of the maintenance of avoidance behavior by the white rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 48, 444–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. SIDMAN, M. 1966. Avoidance behavior. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Pp. 448–498.Google Scholar
  17. SKINNER, B. F. 1969. The phylogeny and ontogeny of behavior. In Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Pp. 172–217.Google Scholar
  18. SNAPPER, A., KNAPP, J., & KUSHNER, H. 1970. Mathematical description of schedules of reinforcement. In W. N. Schoenfeld (Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Pp. 247–275.Google Scholar
  19. WEISMANN, A. 1962. Non-discriminated avoidance behavior in a large sample of rats. Psychological Reports, 10, 591–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael R. Petersen
    • 1
  • David O. Lyon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWestern Michigan UniversityKalamazooUSA

Personalised recommendations