The Psychological Record

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 243–251 | Cite as

Reversal Learning Set in Successive Discrimination Reversal Learning and Transfer with Rats Using Visual and Olfactory Cues

  • Richard S. O’Grady
  • Joseph W. Jennings
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Hooded male rats trained on simple discriminations between odor or brightness cues learned successively to reverse between the odor or brightness cues. They were then transferred to a successive discrimination reversal (SDR) of the other modality. The transfer data indicated that SDR training with one set of cues facilitated the learning of a subsequent discrimination in the other modality.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BITTERMAN, M. E., WODINSKY, J., & CANDLAND, D. K. 1958. Some comparative psychology. American Journal of Psychology, 20, 396–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. FELLOWS, B. J. 1967. Chance stimulus sequences for discrimination tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 87–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. JENNINGS, J. W., & KEEFER, L. H. 1969. Olfactory learning sets in two varieties of domestic rat. Psychological Reports, 24, 3–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. LANGWORTHY, R. A., & JENNINGS, J. W. 1972. Odd ball, abstract, olfactory learning in laboratory rats. The Psychological Record, 22, 487–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. LOVEJOY, 1968. Attention in discrimination learning. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
  6. MACKINTOSH, N. J. 1965. Selective attention in animal discrimination learning. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 124–150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. MACKINTOSH, N. J. 1969. Comparative studies of reversal and probability learning: Rats, birds and fish. In R. M. Gilbert & N. S. Sutherladn (Eds.), Animal discrimination learning. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. MACKINTOSH, N. J., MCGONIGLE, B., HOLGATE, V., & VANDERVER, V. 1968. Factors underlying improvement in serial reversal learning. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 22, 85–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. O’GRADY, R. S., & JENNINGS, J. W. 1972. A comparison of olfactory and visual cue ultilization in laboratory rats. The Psychological Record, 22, 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. SIDOWSKI, J. B., & LOCKHARD, R. B. 1966. Some preliminary considerations in research. In J. B. Sidowski (Ed.), Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. SUTHERLAND, N. S. 1964. The learning of discriminations by animals. Endeavour, 23, 148–153.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. THOMAS, D. R. 1969. The use of operant conditioning techniques to investigate perceptual processes in animals. In R. M. Gilbert & N. S. Sutherland (Eds.), Animal discrimination learning. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. THOMAS, D. R., MILLER, J. T., & SVINICKI, J. G. 1971. Nonspecific transfer effects of discrimination training in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 74, 96–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard S. O’Grady
    • 1
  • Joseph W. Jennings
    • 2
  1. 1.Browning Public SchoolsBrowningUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MontanaMissoulaUSA

Personalised recommendations