The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 191–203 | Cite as

Understanding Observational Learning: An Interbehavioral Approach

  • Mitch J. FrylingEmail author
  • Cristin Johnston
  • Linda J. Hayes


Observational learning is an important area in the field of psychology and behavior science more generally. Given this, it is essential that behavior analysts articulate a sound theory of how behavior change occurs through observation. This paper begins with an overview of seminal research in the area of observational learning, followed by a consideration of common behavior analytic conceptualizations of these findings. The interbehavioral perspective is then outlined, shedding light on some difficulties with the existing behavior analytic approaches. The implications of embracing the interbehavioral perspective for understanding the most complex sorts of behavior, including those involved in observational learning are considered.

Key words

observational learning interbehaviorism interbehavioral psychology stimulus substitution rule-governed behavior 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alvero, A. M., & Austin, J. (2004). The effects of conducting behavioral observations on the behavior of the observer. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 457–468.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Baer, D. M., Peterson, R. F., & Sherman, J. A. (1967). The development of imitation by reinforcing similarity to a model. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 405–416.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Baer, D. M., & Sherman, J. A. (1964). Reinforcement control of generalized imitation in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1965). Influence of models’ reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 589–595.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Oxford, England: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A., Grusec, J. E., & Menlove, F. L. (1966). Observational learning as a function of symbolization and incentive set. Child Development, 37, 499–506.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bandura, A, & Huston, A. C. (1961). Identification as a process of incidental learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 311–318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bandura, A., & Jeffrey, R. W. (1973). Role of symbolic coding and rehearsal processes in observational learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bandura, A., & McDonald, F. J. (1963). Influence of social reinforcement and the behavior of models in shaping children’s judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 274–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 575–582.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Vicarious reinforcement and imitative learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 601–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  14. Biederman, G. B., Robertson, H. A., & Vanayan, M. (1986). Observational learning of Two visual discriminations by pigeons: A within-subjects design. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 45–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Bruzek, J. L., & Thompson, R. H. (2007). Antecedent effects of observing peer play. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 327–331.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Catania, A. C. (2007). Learning, interim 4th edition. Cornwall-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Clayton, M. C., Hayes, L. J., & Swain, M. A. (2005). The nature and value of scientific system building: The case of interbeha-viorism. The Psychological Record, 55, 335–359.Google Scholar
  18. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  19. Fryling, M. J., & Hayes, L. J. (2009). Psychological constructs and events: An alliance with Smith. The Psychological Record, 59, 133–142.Google Scholar
  20. Gladstone, B. W., & Cooley, J. (1975). Behavioral similarity as a reinforcer for preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 23, 357–368.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Greer, R. D., Keohane, D., Meincke, K., Gautreaux, G., Pereira, J. A., Chavez-Brown, M., & Yuan, L. (2004). Key instructional components of effective peer tutoring for tutors, tutees, and peer observers. In D. J. Moran & R. W. Malott (Eds.), Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 295–334). New York: Elsevier/Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greer, R. D., & Ross, D. E. (2008). Verbal behavior analysis: Inducing and expanding complex communication in children with severe language delays. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  23. Greer, R. D., & Singer-Dudek, J. (2008). The emergence of conditioned reinforcement from observation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89, 15–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Greer, R. D., Singer-Dudek, J., & Gautreaux, G. (2006). Observational learning. International Journal of Psychology, 41(6), 486–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greer, R. D., Singer-Dudek, J., Longano, J., & Zrino, M. (2008). The emergence of praise as conditioned reinforcement as a function of observation in preschool and school age children. Revista Mexicana de Psicologia, 25(1), 5–26.Google Scholar
  26. Greer, R. D., & Speckman, J. (2009). The integration of speaker and listener responses: A theory of verbal development. The Psychological Record, 59, 449–488.Google Scholar
  27. Hayes, L. J. (1992a). Equivalence as process. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 97–108). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hayes, L. J. (1992b). The psychological present. The Behavior Analyst, 15, 139–145.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Hayes, L. J., & Fryling, M. J. (2009). Overcoming the pseudo-problem of privacy in the analysis of behavior. Behavior & Philosophy, 37, 39–57.Google Scholar
  30. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.) (2001). Relational Frame Theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  31. Hayes, S. C., Kohlenberg, B. S., & Melancon, S. M. (1989). Avoiding and altering rule-control as a strategy of clinical intervention. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 359–385). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hayes, S. C., Zettle, R. D., & Rosenfarb, I. (1989). Rule following. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 191–220). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Home, P. J., & Erjavec, M. (2007). Do infants show generalized imitation of gestures? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Home, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kantor, J. R. (1921). Association as a fundamental process of objective psychology. The Psychological Review, 28(6), 385–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kantor, J. R. (1924). Principles of psychology (I). Chicago: The Principia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kantor, J. R. (1947). Problems of physiological psychology. Chicago: The Principia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kantor, J. R. (1957). Constructs and events in psychology: Philosophy: Banished and recalled. The Psychological Record, 7, 55–60.Google Scholar
  39. Kantor, J. R. (1977). Psychological linguistics. Chicago: The Principia Press.Google Scholar
  40. Kohn, A. (1999). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s, praise, and other bribes. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  41. Lowenkron, B. (1998). Some logical functions of joint control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69, 327–354.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Meyers, W. A. (1970). Observational learning in monkeys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 14, 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miguel, C. F., Petursdottir, A. I., Carr, J. E., & Michael, J. (2008). The role of naming in stimulus categorization by preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89, 383–405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Moore, J. W., & Fisher, W. W. (2007). The effects of videotape modeling on staff Acquisition of functional analysis methodology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 197–202.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Morris, E. K., Higgins, S. T., & Bickel, W. K. (1982). The influence of Kantor’s interbehavioral psychology on behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 158–173.Google Scholar
  46. Parrott, L. J. (1983a). Similarities and differences between Skinner’s radical behaviorism and Kantor’s interbehavior-ism. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 9(1), 95–115.Google Scholar
  47. Parrott, L. J. (1983b). Systemic foundations for the concept of “private events.” In N. W. Smith, P. T. Mountjoy, & D. H. Ruben (Eds.), Reassessment in psychology: The interbehavioral alternative (pp. 251–268). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  48. Parrott, L. J. (1986). On the role of postulation in the analysis of inapparent events. In H. W. Reese & L. J. Parrott (Eds.), Behavior science: Philosophical, methodological, and empirical advances (pp. 35–60). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  49. Pear, J. J. (2001). The science of learning. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  50. Pierce, D. W., & Cheney, C. D. (2008). Behavior analysis and learning (4th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  51. Poppen, R. L. (1989). Some clinical implications of rule-governed behavior. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 325–357). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ramirez, J., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2009). Observational learning and the emergence of symmetry relations in teaching Spanish vocabulary words to typically developing children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 801–805.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Rehfeldt, R. A., Latimore, D., & Stromer, R. (2003). Observational learning and the formation of classes of reading skills by individuals with autism and other developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 333–358.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Reiss, D. (1972). Vicarious conditioned acceleration: Successful observational learning of an aversive Pavolovian stimulus contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 18, 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rosales-Ruiz, J., & Baer, D. M. (1997). Behavioral cusps: A developmental and pragmatic concept for behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 533–544.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  57. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, N. W. (2006). The interbehavioral field. In B. D. Midgley & E. K. Morris (Eds.), Modern perspectives on J. R. Kantor and interbehaviorism (pp. 87–110). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  60. Smith, N. W. (2007). Events and constructs. The Psychological Record, 57, 169–186.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mitch J. Fryling
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cristin Johnston
    • 2
  • Linda J. Hayes
    • 2
  1. 1.The Chicago School of Professional PsychologyLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.University of NevadaRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations