Advertisement

The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 69–80 | Cite as

The behavior of the listener, generic extensions, and the communicative adequacy of verbal behavior

  • Nathan Stemmer
Article

Abstract

Except for a few words, children first become listeners of a word before becoming speakers of the word. The analysis of listener behavior is therefore of fundamental importance for the complete analysis of verbal behavior. In this paper, some basic aspects of listener behavior are examined: in particular, the events that give origin to the behavior, the generic effects of these events, and intraspecific uniformities between these effects. By relying on the generic effects, the notion of extension is defined. This notion is then used for characterizing correct listener behavior. Finally, the uniformities between the generic effects are shown to play a crucial role in ensuring the communicative adequacy of verbal behavior.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowerman, M. (1976). Semantic factors in the acquisition of rules for word use and sentence construction. In D. M. Morehead & A. E. Morehead (Eds.), Normal and deficient child language (pp. 99–179). Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  2. Braine, D. S., & Hardy, J. A. (1982). On what categories there are, why they are, and how they develop: An amalgam of a priori considerations, speculation, and evidence from children. In L. R. Gleitman & E. Wanner (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 29–239). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapman, K.L., Leonard, L.B., & Mervis, C.B. (1986). The effect of feedback on young children’s inappropriate word usage. Journal of Child Language, 13, 101–117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Goldiamond, I. (1966). Perception, language, and conceptualization rules. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Problem solving (pp. 183–224). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Hayes, S.C., & Hayes, L.J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. In S.C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 153–190). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Honig, W.K., & Urcuioli, P.J. (1981). The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): 25 years of research on stimulus generalization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 405–445.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Jenkins, H.M., & Harrison, R.H. (1960). Effect of discrimination training on auditory generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 246–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kalish, H.I. (1969). Stimulus generalization. In M.H. Marx (Ed.) Learning: Processes (pp. 207–297). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  10. Kirby, K.C., & Bickel, W.K. (1988). Toward an explicit analysis of generalization: A stimulus control interpretation. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 115–129.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee, V.L. (1981). Prepositional phrases spoken and heard. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 35, 227–242.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Lenneberg, E. H. (1962). Understanding language without ability to speak: A case report. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 419–425.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. MacCorquodale, K. (1970). On Chomsky’s review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mackintosh, N.J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mostofsky, D.I. (1965). Stimulus generalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ninio, A. (1980). Ostensive definition in vocabulary teaching. Journal of Child Language, 7, 565–573.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ninio, A., & Bruner, J. (1978). The achievement and antecedents of labelling. Journal of Child Language, 5, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Osgood, C.E. (1953). Method and theory in experimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Pearce, J.M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532–552.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Peirce, C.S. (1878/1957). The order of nature. In V. Thomas (Ed.) Essays in the philosophy of science. (pp. 105–125). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  21. Quine, W.V. (1953). Identity, ostension, and hypostasis. In W.V. Quine (Ed.), From a Logical Point of View (pp. 65–79). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Quine, W.V. (1969). Natural kinds. In W.V. Quine (Ed.), Ontological relativity and other essays (pp. 114–138). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Quine, W.V. (1974). The roots of reference. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  24. Quine, W.V., & Ullian, J.S. (1970). The web of belief. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  25. Reese, H.W. (1991). Mentalistic approaches to verbal behavior. In L.J. Hayes & S.C. Hayes (Eds.) Dialogues on verbal behavior: The first international institute on verbal relations (pp. 151–177). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B.B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schlesinger, I.M. (1971). Learning grammar: From pivot to realization rule. In R. Huxley and E. Ingram (Eds.), Language acquisition: Models and methods. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Schlesinger, I.M. (1982). Steps to language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Schoneberger, T. (1990). Understanding and the listener: Conflicting views. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 141–150.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Sidman, M. (1979). Remarks. Behaviorism, 7, 123–126.Google Scholar
  32. Siegel, S., Hearst, E., George, N., & O’Neal, E. (1968). Generalization gradients obtained from individual subjects following classical conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 171–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Skinner, B.F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Skinner, B.F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  36. Stemmer, N. (1973). An empiricist theory of language acquisition. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  37. Stemmer, N. (1978). A partial solution to the Goodman paradox. Philosophical Studies, 34, 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stemmer, N. (1980). Natural concepts and generalization classes. The Behavior Analyst, 3, 41–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Stemmer, N. (1981a). Generalization classes as alternatives for similarities and some other concepts. Erkenntnis, 16, 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stemmer, N. (1981b). The objective confirmation of hypotheses. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 11, 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stemmer, N. (1983). The roots of knowledge. New York: St. Martin’s Press (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  42. Stemmer, N. (1987). The learning of syntax: An empiricist approach. First Language, 7, 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stemmer, N. (1990). Skinner’s Verbal Behavior, Chomsky’s review, and mentalism. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 307–319.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Sundberg, M.L., San Juan, B., Dawdy, M., & Arguelles, M. (1990). The acquisition of tacts, mands, and intraverbals by individuals with traumatic brain injury. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 83–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nathan Stemmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyBar-Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations