The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 19–26 | Cite as

Toward a Technology of Generalization: The Identification of Natural Contingencies of Reinforcement

  • Frank W. Kohler
  • Charles R. Greenwood
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Applied behavior analysts have directed a growing effort towards the development of a technology for behavioral generalization and maintenance over the past decade. Among the list of potential generalization promoters thought to exist is the natural contingency of social reinforcement (i.e., a behavioral trap) for new behavior in its untrained form or setting, or over time. Although past researchers have noted a need to program for the generalization and maintenance of behavior change, the current understanding of behavioral traps precludes the use of these contingencies to support behavioral changes when interventions are not in operation. This article describes five forms of evidence useful for the identification and analysis of natural contingencies of reinforcement. Examples from the applied research literature are provided to illustrate the kinds of studies that would greatly enhance our knowledge of behavioral traps and improve our ability to understand and program the generalization of trained behaviors across diverse forms and settings, and over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agras, W. S., & Berkowitz, R. (1980). Clinical research in behavior therapy: Halfway there? Behavior Therapy, 11, 472–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, K. E., Hart, B., Buell, J. S., Harris, F. R., & Wolf, M. M. (1964). Effects of social reinforcement on isolate behavior of a nursery school child. Child Development, 35, 511–518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Atthowe, J. M. (1973). Behavior innovation and persistence. American Psychologist, 27, 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Axelrod, S., Hall, R. V., & Maxwell, A. (1972). Use of peer attention to increase study behavior. Academic Therapy, 3, 349–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayllon, T., & Azrin, N. H. (1968). The token economy: A motivational system for therapy and rehabilitation. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  6. Baer, D. M., Rowbury, T. G., & Goetz, E. M. (1975). Behavioral traps in the preschool: A proposal for research. Paper presented at the Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  7. Baer, D. M., & Wolf, M. M. (1970). The entry into natural communities of reinforcement. In R. Ulrick, T. Stachnik, & J. Mabry (Eds.), Control of human behavior (pp. 319–324). Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.Google Scholar
  8. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Borkovec, T. D., & Bauer, R. M. (1982). Experimental design in group outcome research. In A. Bellack, M. Hersen, & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), International handbook of behavior modification and therapy (pp. 139–165). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buehler, R. E., Patterson, G. R., & Furniss, J. M. (1966). The reinforcement of behavior in institutional settings. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 4, 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buell, J., Stoddard, P., Harris, F. R., & Baer, D. M. (1968). Collateral social development accompanying reinforcement of outdoor play in a preschool child. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 167–173.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Cochrane, R., & Sobol, M. P. (1976). Myth and methodology in behavior therapy research. In M. P. Feldman & A. Broadhorst (Eds.), Theoretical and empirical bases of the behavior therapies (pp. 365–404). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Cooke, T. P., & Apolloni, T. (1976). Developing positive social-emotional behaviors: A study of training and generalization effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 65–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Delquadri, J. C., Greenwood, C. R., Stretton, K., & Hall, R. V. (1983). The peer tutoring game: A classroom procedure for increasing opportunity to respond and spelling performance. Education and Treatment of Children, 6, 225–238.Google Scholar
  15. Greenwood, C. R., & Hops, H. (1981). Group-oriented contingencies and peer behavior change. In P. S. Strain (Ed.), The utilization of classroom peers as behavior change agents (pp. 189–259). New York and London: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenwood, C. R., Sloane, H. N., & Baskin, A. (1974). Training elementary aged peer managers to control small group mathematics. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 103–114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall, R. V., & Broden, M. (1967). Behavior changes in brain-injured children through social reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 5, 463–479.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Harris, F. R., Johnston, M. K., Kelley, C. S., & Wolf, M. M. (1964). Effects of positive social reinforcement on regressed crawling of a nursery school child. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hopkins, B. L. (1968). Effects of candy and social reinforcement schedule on the modification and maintenance of smiling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 121–129.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Hops, H., Walker, H. M., & Greenwood, C. R. (1979). PEERS: A program for remediating social withdrawal in the school setting: Aspects of a research and development process. In L. A. Hamerlynck (Ed.), Behavioral systems for the developmental disabled I: School and family environments (pp. 45–86). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, T. J., Goetz, E. M., Baer, D. M., & Green, D. R. (1981). The effects of an experimental game on the classroom cooperative play of a preschool isolate. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 7, 21–36.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, R. T., & Kazdin, A. E. (1975). Programming response maintenance after withdrawing token reinforcement. Behavior Therapy, 6, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kazdin, A. E. (1980). Behavior modification in applied settings (rev. ed.). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kazdin, A. E., & Geesey, S. (1977). Simultaneous treatment design comparisons of the effects of earning reinforcers for ones peers versus for one-self. Behavior Therapy, 8, 682–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kauffman, J. M., Nussen, J. L., & McGee, C. S. (1977). Follow-up in classroom behavior modification: Survey and discussion. Journal of School Psychology, 15, 343–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keely, S. M., Shemberg, K. M., & Corbonell, J. (1976). Operant clinical intervention: Behavior management or beyond? Where are the data? Behavior Therapy, 7, 292–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kohler, F. W., & Fowler, S. A. (1985). Training prosocial behaviors to young children: An analysis of reciprocity with untrained peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 187–200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Kohler, F. W., Greenwood, C. R., & Baer, D. M. (1985). Assessing the peer tutoring process: The identification of natural communities of social reinforcement. Paper presented at the Association for Behavior Analysis, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
  29. Lovitt, T. C., Lovitt, A. D., Eaton, M. D., & Kirkwood, M. (1973). The deceleration of inappropriate comments by a natural consequence. Journal of School Psychology, 11, 148–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Norquist, V. M., & Bradley, B. (1973). Speech acquisition in a nonverbal isolate child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 15, 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paine, S. C., Hops, H., Walker, H. M., Greenwood, C. R., Fleischman, D. H., & Guild, J. J. (1982). Repeated treatment effects: A study of maintaining behavior change in socially withdrawn children. Behavior Modification, 6, 171–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Patterson, G. R., Jones, R., Whittier, J., & Wright, M. A. (1965). A behavior modification technique for the hyperactive child. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 2, 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Repucci, N. D., & Saunders, J. T. (1974). The social psychology of behavior modification: Problems of implementation in natural settings. American Psychologist, 29, 649–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Solomon, R. W., & Wahler, R. W. (1973). Peer reinforcement control of classroom problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 49–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Strain, P. S. (1977). An experimental analysis of peer social initiations on the behavior of withdrawn preschool children: Some training and generalization effects. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 445–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Strain, P. S. (1981). The utilization of classroom peers as behavior change agents. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Strain, P. S., & Fox, J. J. (1981). Peers as behavior change agents for withdrawn classmates. In B. B. Lahey & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (vol. 4, pp. 167–198). New York and London: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Strain, P. S., Kerr, M. M., & Ragland, E. U. (1981). The use of peer social initiations in the treatment of social withdrawal. In P. S. Strain (Ed.), The utilization of classroom peers for behavior change (pp. 101–128). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tremblay, A., Strain, P. S., Hendrickson, J., & Shores, R. (1981). Social interactions of normal preschool children: Using normative data for subject and target behavior selection. Behavior Modification, 5, 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Houten, R., & Van Houten, S. (1977). The performance feedback system in the special education classroom: An analysis of public posting and peer comments. Behavior Therapy, 8, 366–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank W. Kohler
    • 1
  • Charles R. Greenwood
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Human Development and Family LifeUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.Juniper Gardens Children’s ProjectKansas CityUSA

Personalised recommendations