Behavior Analysis in Practice

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 34–54 | Cite as

Behavioral Economics

A Tutorial for Behavior Analysts in Practice
  • Derek D. Reed
  • Christopher R. Niileksela
  • Brent A. Kaplan
Article
First Online:

Abstract

In recent years, behavioral economics has gained much attention in psychology and public policy. Despite increased interest and continued basic experimental studies, the application of behavioral economics to therapeutic settings remains relatively sparse. Using examples from both basic and applied studies, we provide an overview of the principles comprising behavioral economic perspectives and discuss implications for behavior analysts in practice. A call for further translational research is provided.

Keywords

behavioral economics demand discounting tutorial 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ainslie, G. (1974). Impulse control in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 21, 485–489.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York, NY: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
  3. Ariely, D. (2010). The upside of irrationality: The unexpected benefits of defying logic at work and at home. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  4. Barkley, R. A., Edwards, G., Laneri, M., Fletcher, K., & Metevia, L. (2001). Executive functioning, temporal discounting, and sense of time in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 541–556.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bickel, W. K., Green, L., & Vuchinich, R. E. (1995). Behavioral economics. Journal of the experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 257–262.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickel, W. K., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Mueller, E. T., & Gatchalian, K. M. (2011). The behavioral economics and neuroeconomics of reinforcer pathologies: Implications for etiology and treatment of addiction. Current Psychiatry Reports, 13, 406–415.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bickel, W. K., Marsch, L. A., & Carroll, M. E. (2000). Deconstructing relative reinforcing efficacy and situating the measures of pharmacological reinforcement with behavioraleconomics: A theoretical proposal. Psychopharmacology, 153, 44–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Borrero, J. C., Francisco, M. T., Haberlin, A. T., Ross, N. A., & Sran, S. K. (2007). A unit price evaluation of severe problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 463–474.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Broussard, C., & Northup, J. (1997). The use of functional analysis to develop peer interventions for disruptive classroom behavior. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burns, M. K. (2011). School psychology research: Combining ecological theory and prevention science. School Psychology Review, 40, 132–139.Google Scholar
  11. Camerer, C. (1999). Behavioral economics: Reunifying psychology and economics. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science, 96, 10575–10577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Camerer, C. F., Loewensein, G., & Rabin, M. (Eds.). (2004). Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press & Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  13. Chapman, G. B. (1996). Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 771–791.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Collier, G., Johnson, D. F., & Morgan, C. (1992). The magnitude-of-reinforcement function in closed and open economies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 81–89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Critchfield, T., & Reed, D. D. (2004). Conduits of translation in behavior-science bridge research. In E. Ribes Iñesta & J. E. Burgos (Eds.), Theory, basic and applied research, and technological applications in behavior science: Conceptual and methodological issues (pp. 45–84). Guadalajara, Mexico: University of Guadalajara Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dixon, M. R., Horner, M. J., & Guercio, J. (2003). Self-control and the preference for delayed reinforcement: An example in brain injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 371–374.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Francisco, M. T., Madden, G. J., & Borrero, J. (2009). Behavioral economics: Principles, procedures, and utility for applied behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst Today, 10, 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Green, L., & Freed, D. E. (1993). The substitutability of reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 141–158.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Green, L., Myerson, J., & Ostaszewski, P. (1999). Discounting of delayed rewards across the life span: Age differences in individual discounting functions. Behavioural Processes, 46, 89–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffiths, R. R., Brady, J. V., & Bradford, L. D. (1979). Predicting the abuse liability of drugs and animal drug self-administration procedures: Psychomotor stimulants and hallucinogens. In T. Thompson & P. B. Dews (Eds.), Advances in behavioral pharmacology (Vol. 2, pp. 163–208). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Grosch, J., & Neuringer, A. (1981). Self-control in pigeons under the Mischel paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 35, 3–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Grunwald, M. (2009, April 2). How Obama is using the science of change. Time Magazine, April. Retrieved from http://www.time.com.
  23. Hackenberg, T. D. (2009). Token reinforcement: A review and analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91, 257–286.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Hillier, B. (1991). The macroeconomic debate: Models of the closed and open economy. New York, NY: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Hursh, S. R. (1980). Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 219–238.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Hursh, S. R. (1984). Behavioral economics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 435–452.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Hursh, S. R. (2000). Behavioral economic concepts and methods for studying health behavior. In W. K. Bickel & R. E. Vuchinich (Eds.), Reframing health behavior change with behavioral economics (pp. 27–62). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  28. Hursh, S. R., Madden, G. J., Spiga, R., DeLeon, I. G., & Francisco, M. T. (2013). The translational utility of behavioral economics: The experimental analysis of consumption and choice. In Madden, G. J., Dube, W. V., Hackenberg, T. D., Hanley, G. P., & Lattal, K. A. (Eds.), APA handbook of behavior analysis: Vol. 2. Translating principles into practice (pp. 191–224). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hursh, S. R., Raslear, T. G., Shurtleff, D., Bauman, R., & Simmons, L. (1988). A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 419–440.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Hursh, S. R., & Roma, P. G. (2013). Behavioral economics and empirical public policy. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 99, 98–124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2002). Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77, 129–146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2006). Replacing relative reinforcing efficacy with behavioral economic demand curves. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85, 73–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones, B. & Rachlin, H. (2006). Social discounting. Psychological Science, 17, 283–286.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kahneman, D., Slovic, A. & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kazdin, A. E. & Bootzin, R. B. (1972). The token economy: An evaluative review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 243–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kirby, K. N., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1995). Preference reversals due to myopic discounting of delayed reward. Psychological Science, 6, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kodak, T., Lerman, D. C., & Call, N. (2007). Evaluating the influence of postsession reinforcement on choice of reinforcers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 515–527.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Kohlenberg, B. S., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1991). The transfer of contextual control over equivalence classes through equivalence classes: A possible model of social stereotyping. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 505–518.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. LaFiette, M. H., & Fantino, E. (1989). Responding on concurrent-chains schedules in open and closed economies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 329–342.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Locke, J. (1691). Some considerations of the consequences of the lowering of interest, and raising the value of money: In a letter sent to a member of parliament. London: Awnsham and John Churchill. Retrieved from http://books.google.comGoogle Scholar
  41. Mace, F. C., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Translational research in behavior analysis: Historical traditions and imperative for the future. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 293–312.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Madden, G. J. (2000). A behavioral economics primer. In W. K. Bickel & R. E. Vuchinich (Eds.), Reframing health behavior change with behavioral economics (pp. 3–26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  43. Madden, G. J., Begotka, A. M., Raiff, B. R., & Kastern, L. L. (2003). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 139–145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Madden, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (2010). Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martens, B. K., & Kelly, S. Q. (1993). A behavioral analysis of effective teaching. School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 10–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. V. The effect of delay and intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 55–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  47. Neef, N. A., & Lutz, M. N. (2001). Assessment of variables affecting choice and application to classroom interventions. School Psychology Quarterly, 16, 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Neef, N. A., Shade, D., & Miller, M. S. (1994). Assessing influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 575–583.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Persky, J. (1995). Retrospectives: The ethology of homo economicus. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Poling, A. (2010). Progressive-ratio schedule and applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 347–349.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Rachlin, H., Green, L., Kagel, J. H., & Battalio, R. C. (1976). Economic demand theory and psychological studies of choice. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 10, pp. 129–154). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  52. Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., & Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 233–244.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Reed, D. D. (2008). The translation of basic behavioral research to school psychology: A citation analysis. The Behavior Analyst Today, 9, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reed, D. D., DiGennaro Reed, F. D., Chok, J., & Brozyna, G. A. (2011). The “tyranny of choice”: Choice overload as a possible instance of effort discounting. The Psychological Record, 61, 547–560.Google Scholar
  55. Reed, D. D., & Martens, B. K. (2011). Temporal discounting predicts student responsiveness to exchange delays in a classroom token system. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 1–18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Roane, H. (2008). On the applied use of progressive-ratio schedules of reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 155–161.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Roane, H. S., Call, N. A., & Falcomata, T. S. (2005). A preliminary analysis of adaptive responding under open and closed economies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 335–348.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Roane, H. S., Falcomata, T. S., & Fisher, W. W. (2007). Applying the behavioral economics principle of unit price to DRO schedule thinning. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 529–534.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Roane, H. S., Lerman, D. C., & Vorndran, C. M. (2001). Assessing reinforcers under progressive schedule requirements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 145–167.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Salvy, S. J., Nitecki, L. A., & Epstein, L. H. (2009). Do social activities substitute for food in youth? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 38, 205–212.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (1985). Economics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  62. Scheres, A., Dijkstra, M., Ainslie, E., Balkan, J., Reynolds, B., Sonuga-Barke, E., & Castellanos, F. X. (2006). Temporal and probabilistic discounting of rewards in children and adolescents: Effects of age and ADHD symptoms. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2092–2103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Schouwenburg, H. C., & Groenewoud, J. T. (2001). Study motivation under social temptation: Effects of trait procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schweitzer, J. B., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1988). Self-control: Teaching tolerance for delay in impulsive children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 173–186.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Sheridan, S. M., & Gutkin, T. B. (2000). The ecology of school psychology: Examining and changing our paradigm for the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 29, 485–502.Google Scholar
  66. Sheridan, S. M., Kratochwill, T. R., & Bergan, J. R. (1996). Conjoint behavioral consultation: A procedural manual. New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  68. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Tversky, A., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Anomalies: Preference reversals. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Derek D. Reed
    • 1
  • Christopher R. Niileksela
    • 2
  • Brent A. Kaplan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied Behavioral ScienceUniversity of Kansas, 4048 Dole Human Development CenterLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology and Research in EducationUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations