Advertisement

Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection

, Volume 118, Issue 3–4, pp 102–108 | Cite as

Influence of electrical conductivity on biological activity of Pythium ultimum and Binab T in a closed soilless system

  • Sammar KhalilEmail author
Article

Abstract

The effects of electrical conductivity (EC) of the nutrient solution on the performance of the commercial biocontrol product Binab T against the root pathogen Pythium ultimum were studied in order to identify supporting factors to increase the efficiency and decrease the inconsistency of biocontrol agents in closed cultivation systems. Using a substrate-based growing system, the commercial product Binab T with the active strains Trichoderma polysporum plus T. harzianum was evaluated at four different EC levels (1.5, 2.5, 3.5 and 5.0 mS cm−1) over seven weeks in a controlled climate chamber environment, using tomato as the model plant. Addition of the biocontrol agent to the cultivation system caused a reduction in the level and incidence of pathogen attack that improved with increasing EC level from 2.5 mS cm−1 onward. Production of the cell wall-degrading enzymes cellulase and glucanase by Binab T increased with increasing EC level, independent of pathogen presence. In a control treatment with no artificial inoculation, enzyme activity decreased with increasing EC level. Increasing EC levels in the presence of Binab T also had a positive effect on plant biomass. The highest antagonistic effect of Binab T against Pythium ultimum, as indicated by enzyme activity, amount of pathogen in the system and disease incidence, occurred at 3.5 mS cm−1. The plant growth-promoting effect of Binab T also peaked at 3.5 mS cm−1.

Keywords

cell wall-degrading enzymes closed cultivation system nutrient solution root pathogen tomato Trichoderma 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brand T & Alsanius BW, 2004. Induction and impact of cell wall degrading enzymes in nutrient solution of closed hydroponic systems. J Phytopath 152, 313–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergstrand KJ, 2009. Variables limiting efficacy of slow filters integrated into closed hydroponic growing systems. Thesis (Lic.-avh.Alnarp: Sveriges lantbruksuniv.) ISBN 978-9186197-10-0.Google Scholar
  3. Ehret DL, Alsanius BW, Wohanka W, Menzies JG & Utkhede R, 2001. Disinfection of recirculating nutrient solution in greenhouse horticulture. Agronomea 21, 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hansson T, 2003. Dräneringsvatten I växthus. Jönköping: SJV. (Jordbruksinformation 16, In Swedish.Google Scholar
  5. Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I & Lorito M, 2004. Trichoderma species-opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nature Rev 2, 43–56.Google Scholar
  6. Hultberg M, Alsberg T, Khalil S & Alsanius BW, 2010. Suppression of disease in tomato infected by Pythium ultimum with a biosurfactant produced Pseudomonas koreensis. Biocont 55, 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hultberg M, Alsanius BW & Sundin P, 2000. In vivo and in vitro interactions between Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pythium ultimum in the suppression of damping-off in tomato seedlings. Biol Control 19, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Inbar J, Abramsky M, Cohen D & Chet I, 1994. Plant growth enhancement and disease control by Trichoderma harzianum in vegetable seedlings grown under commercial conditions. Eur J Plant Path 100, 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Khalil S & Alsanius BW, 2001. Dynamics of the indigenous microflora inhabiting the root zone and the nutrient solution in a commercial closed greenhouse system. Gartenbauwissenschaften 66, 188–198.Google Scholar
  10. Khalil S, Alsanius BW & Hultberg M, 2009. Effect of growing media on the interaction between biocontrol agents and root pathogens in closed hydroponic system. J Hort Scien Biotech 84, 489–494.Google Scholar
  11. Krauss S, Schnitzler WH, Grassmann J & Woitke M, 2006. The influence of different electrical conductivity values in a simplified recirculating soilless system on inner and outer fruit quality characteristics of tomato. J Agri Food Chemist 45, 441–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCullagh M, Utkhede R, Menzies JG, Punja ZK & Paulitz TC, 1996. Evaluation of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for biological control of Pythium root rot of cucumbers grown in rockwool and effects on yield. Eur J Plant Pathol 102, 747–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Papavizas GC, 1985. Trichoderma and Gliocladium: biology, ecology and potential for biocontrol. Ann Rev Phytopathol 23, 23–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Park JH & Kim HK, 1989. Biological control Phytophthora crown and root rot of greenhouse pepper with Trichoderma harzianum and Enterobacter agglomerans by improved method of application. Korean J Pl Pathol 5, 1–12.Google Scholar
  15. Paulitz TC, 1997. Biological control of root pathogens in soilless and hydroponic systems. HortScience 32, 193–196.Google Scholar
  16. Stanghellinni ME & Rasmussen SL, 1994. Hydroponics — a solution for zoosporic pathogens. Plant Dis 78, 1129–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schwarz D & Grosch R, 2003. Influence of nutrient solution concentration and a root pathogen (Pythium aphanidermatum) on tomato root growth and morphology. Sci Hortic 97, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thinggaard K & Anderssen H, 1995. Influence of watering frequency and electrical conductivity of the nutrient solution on Phytophthora Root Rot in pot plants of Gerbera. Plant Dis 79, 259–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Voogt W & Sonneveld C, 1997. Nutrient management in closed growing systems for greenhouse production, In: Goto E. (Ed.), Plant production in closed ecosystems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 83–102.Google Scholar
  20. Wu M & Kubota C, 2007. Effect of high electrical conductivity of nutrient solution and its application timing on lycopene, chlorophyll and sugar concentrations of hydroponic tomatoes during ripening. Sci Hortic 116, 122–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zahran HH, 1997. Diversity adaptation and activity of the bacterial flora in saline environments. Biol Fert Soil 25, 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Phythomedizinische Gesellschaft 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Microbial Horticulture Laboratory, Department of HorticultureSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesAlnarpSweden

Personalised recommendations