Advertisement

The Value of Virtual Patients in Medical Education

  • Naveed Saleh
General Issue

Abstract

In this systematic review, I examined the use of virtual patient simulations as a medical teaching tool. Virtual patients are computer-based patient simulations used to educate and test medical knowledge and skills. I concentrated on Western systems of medical education and limited my search to English-language journal articles published from 2005 to 2010. I examined potential advantages and disadvantages of virtual patients, results from experimental studies on virtual patients, and practice-based tips. A chief finding of my literature review is that research supports the proper integration of virtual patients into medical curricula. One limitation of the use of virtual patients is that development can be expensive and resource intensive. One solution is the creation of a virtual commons or online community where resources are shared.

Keywords

virtual patient medical education virtual commons 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Berman N, Fall LH, Smith S, Levine DA, Maloney CG, Potts M, Siegel B, Foster-Johnson L. Integration strategies for using virtual patients in clinical clerkships. Acad Med 2009;84:942–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang G, Reynolds R, Candler C. Virtual patient simulation at US and Canadian medical schools. Acad Med 2007;82:446–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellaway R, Poulton T, Fors U, McGee JB, Albright S. Building a virtual patient commons. Med Teacher 2008; 30:170–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Triola M, Feldman H, Kalet AL, Zabar S, Kachur EK, Gillespie C, Anderson M, Griesser C, Lipkin M. A randomized trial of teaching clinical skills using virtual and live standardized patients. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:424–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sijstermans R, Jaspers MWM., Bloemendaal PM, Schoonderwaldt EM. Training inter-physician communication using the dynamic patient simulator. Int J Med Inform 2007;76:336–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Posel N, Fleiszer D, Shore BM. 12 Tips: Guidelines for authoring virtual patient cases. Med Teacher 2009;31:701–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deladisma AM, Cohen M, Stevens A, Wagner P, Lok B, Bernard T, Oxendine C, Schumacher L, Johnsen K, Dickerson R, Raij A, Wells R, Duerson M, Harper JG, Lind DS. Do medical students respond empathetically to a virtual patient? Am J Surg 2007; 193:756–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bearman M, Cesnik B, Liddell M. Random comparison of “virtual patient” models in the context of teaching clinical communication skills. Med Educ 2001;35:824–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huwendiek S, Reichert F, Bosse HM, De Leng BA, Van der Vleuten CPM, Haag M, Hoffmann GF, Tönshoff B. Design principles for virtual patients: A focus group study among students. Med Educ 2009;43:580–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for the Behavioral Sciences and Medical Education 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Texas A&M UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations